What's new

If push had come to shove, we would have decimated Pak Navy during Balakot strike: Indian Navy chief

.
What rubbish. Any competent military will lock down an installation that has been locked onto, hit, or even just threatened by enemy aircraft to investigate fully if anything hit it, if anything hit nearby or if there is a lingering risk that India might try AGAIN with cruise missiles, having failed the first time. Moreover, the military would likely want to establish if any sensitive materials are there that need removal for national security purposes. Moreover the possibility of enemy field agents needs to be assessed, who for example may have been active in the area sending coordinates for air attacks. There are a dozen good reasons for immediate security lockdown. DESPITE those good reasons, a few journalists DID report on day 1 or 2 after the supposed strike. Then there was a proper lockdown. Then journalists came back after some weeks. What is this crap that Indians keep spouting about the delay in allowing tourist parties into an active targetted site, whether it was hit or not?? Indians really clutching at straws. Our airspace is STILL closed because of lingering threat of random attacks. Does the closure of that airspace imply we are hiding a thousand destroyed cloud cities in that airspace??

Very good analysis.

looks like chutyapan is requirement for Indian military leadership ;)

For civilian leadership, as well. No exceptions.
 
.
Even if that were true, we would have destroyed the entire Pakistan Navy (or atleast 90%) for the loss of just two subs.
like. u destroy f16 on PowerPoint and yr own helicopter in reality killing 6 of yr own iaf official in response of paf mock bombing of Indian HQ and shooting of two iaf jets my child :)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom