What's new

If Pakistan is attacked this would be the final war, Sheikh Rasheed Full Speech

when he was information minister in musharaf tenure he allowed indian movies and their content in Pakistan media so I think he is only good at making statements

The situation in the Musharraf era was different although I don't agree with some decisions taken back then. We were close to a Kashmir resolution.

Today it is a different story with Modi.

The statements he made during Musharraf's tenure should be seen in that context.
 
Well when people do not have argument, then they just debate in irrational way..Quite expwcted
The Kashmiri people must decide the future status of their country. That is their inalienable right.
What is your rational response to that.

If war is to decide the fate of kashmir then it it should have done so in last 3 wars which pak lost to India...if India lose, pak might get kashmir or delhi but if they lose they will keep spreading venoms In form of jihad and terrorism, pak army will try to get more stronger to take revenge...extremism and nationalism will ruin their country and whole subcontinet will suffer....war is not the solution but accept the reality on ground and move on is the only solution for peace
The solution for peace is not what India wants or what Pakistan wants.
Kashmir belongs neither to India nor Pakistan, it belongs to the Kashmiris.
The only solution for peace is what the Kashmiris want.
This is how it will be settled in the end.

You can occupy them, kill them, rape them, take away their democratic rights, do what you want but you cannot suppress their craving for freedom or their will to fight for it.
 
The Kashmiri people must decide the future status of their country. That is their inalienable right.
What is your rational response to that.


The solution for peace is not what India wants or what Pakistan wants.
Kashmir belongs neither to India nor Pakistan, it belongs to the Kashmiris.
The only solution for peace is what the Kashmiris want.
This is how it will be settled in the end.

You can occupy them, kill them, rape them, take away their democratic rights, do what you want but you cannot suppress their craving for freedom or their will to fight for it.
If agreed to your solution, the world will see addition of another 1000 countries on the map and will take us back to stone age...time to unite and not to separate, you are vulnerable to external and internal threats when you are small and weak..
 
This monkey has spoiled the case of Kashmiris more than anyone. This bloody selfish bustard could have facilitated the peaceful solution of Kashmir issue in Nawaz first term, but instead, he facilitated Jaish. I will, shedya, Kashmir wasty sano teri lor nai, apnian luchan kithy hör jaky Tal.
 
If agreed to your solution, the world will see addition of another 1000 countries on the map and will take us back to stone age...time to unite and not to separate, you are vulnerable to external and internal threats when you are small and weak..
And by your argument then Bangladesh, Burma, Pakistan,Sri Lanka etc should be part of India because they would be stronger as part of a bigger country. Or India could become a part of China because it would be stronger as part of a bigger nation.
By the same token why don't you allow the Kashmiris to become part of a bigger country, and one they identify with and one they want to belong to, Pakistan.
Peoples have the right to belong to any entity or none depending on who they identify with or who they emotionally feel a part of.
The Kashmiri people obviously identify with their Muslim brethren in Pakistan, the fact that Pakistani flags are displayed at demonstrations and funerals tells you all you need to know. You will never keep the Kashmiris by force.
The time for their liberation has never been closer.
 
Back
Top Bottom