If India and Pakistan were not enemies

[lamayuru]

Why did Pakistan and India part anyway?

all for a few bloated egos!

 

[Silverfalcon]

Then the Indians wont be crawling all over Afghanistan building Intelligence outposts.

 

[greatsequence]

if we become friends worlds waipons industry will crash and 40% of waipons compnyes will bankrupt.

I hope one day they will crash.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

all for a few bloated egos!

Because Pakistanis wanted to, sort of like how Indians parted ways from the British.

 

[shravan]

Why did Pakistan and India part anyway?

Because British planned the Partition in 1888 and our stupid leaders could not understand the plan & they themselves were greedy for the power.

Soon the Kashmir problem was created and in that British (& EVEN AMERICA) played a important role and everything after that is History.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Because British planned the Partition in 1888 and our stupid leaders could not understand the plan & they themselves were greedy for the power.

Indian Zahid Hamid conspiracy theory ....hence the tarring and feathering of jaswant Singh for trying to correct the irrational hatred of Jinnah and Pakistan in India.

Soon the Kashmir problem was created and in that British (& EVEN AMERICA) played a important role and everything after that is History.

Kashmir problem was not created by the British, but it was perpetuated by India through its refusal to allow a plebsicite.

Even now, it is India preventing a full normalization of the Indo-Pak relationship by refusing to allow the Kashmiris to choose in a plebsicite - are the British yanking India's chain even now?

 

[shravan]

Indian Zahid Hamid conspiracy theory ....hence the tarring and feathering of jaswant Singh for trying to correct the irrational hatred of Jinnah and Pakistan in India.

Indian Partition and Neo
As the British civil servant Sir John Strachey wrote in 1888, "the truth plainly is that the existence side by side of these hostile creeds is one of the strong points in our political position in India. The better classes of Mohammedans are already a source to us of strength and not of weakness.... They constitute a small but energetic minority of the population, whose political interests are identical with ours." (India, 1888, p.225).

--
^^If the above is wrong please let me know i will change my mind without asking any questions.

Kashmir problem was not created by the British, but it was perpetuated by India through its refusal to allow a plebsicite.

To be frank i don't know what exactly when wrong during that time but both India & Pakistan were fooled in the Kashmir Issue.

All top civil and military officers were British in Pakistan. They made a plan for Pakistan to attack Kashmir with some tribesmen in mufti to invade Kashmir on October 20. This made Maharaja and National Conference of Shiekh Abdullah ask for India’s help. After accepting accession, Indian army was sent to prevent the Pak invaders from occupation of Kashmir. As the fighting was going on, Mountbatten asked Congress leaders not to attack Pakistan but to complain to UN.
---

^^If the above is wrong please let me know. I will change my mind without asking any questions.

Thanks

 

[ashwin]

I told u dont ask such question it will become India vs Pakistan

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Indian Partition and Neo
As the British civil servant Sir John Strachey wrote in 1888, "the truth plainly is that the existence side by side of these hostile creeds is one of the strong points in our political position in India. The better classes of Mohammedans are already a source to us of strength and not of weakness.... They constitute a small but energetic minority of the population, whose political interests are identical with ours." (India, 1888, p.225).

--
^^If the above is wrong please let me know i will change my mind without asking any questions.

A civil servant made a comment of some sort - now did he pay off and brainwash all the Muslim League leadership and supporters, not to mention the millions who voted for Pakistan?

To be frank i don't know what exactly when wrong during that time but both India & Pakistan were fooled in the Kashmir Issue.

All top civil and military officers were British in Pakistan. They made a plan for Pakistan to attack Kashmir with some tribesmen in mufti to invade Kashmir on October 20. This made Maharaja and National Conference of Shiekh Abdullah ask for India’s help. After accepting accession, Indian army was sent to prevent the Pak invaders from occupation of Kashmir. As the fighting was going on, Mountbatten asked Congress leaders not to attack Pakistan but to complain to UN.
---

^^If the above is wrong please let me know. I will change my mind without asking any questions.

Thanks

The Tribal invasion started off without any official Pakistani or British instigation - the assistance, when it did come, was extremely low level, through a Pakistani Army officer, Major Akbar.

There is confusion over whether the top level Pakistani leadership was aware of it completely.

There was absolutely no British involvement in the Tribal invasion, or the local Kashmiri rebellion against the maharajah that preceded the tribal invasion.

 

[ashwin]

Things were going fine. We were discussing what we have to offer to Pakistan and what Pakistan has to offer to India if were at peace. Then beloved friend came and asked "Why do you parted anyway?"

And we started it all over again

Guys this is the reason we parted away

 

[bigmoneymaker]

funny.......lots of talking based on unreal presumption comes back to reality....what an incredible cycle of hatred, it is better that the wet dream being ended...

 

[Jatt Boy]

Biggest victory for Sikhs, we suffered alot. 1st India-Pak partition, later Himachal, Haryana new states, now greedy politicians have 'Chandigarh' issue, it also has inclined towards Haryana, Go Punjab search new capital again.

 

[Omar1984]

Why did Pakistan and India part anyway?

Take a look at these thread:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/milita...u-divided-india-not-jinnah-jaswant-singh.html

http://www.defence.pk/forums/current-events-social-issues/32153-india-state-bans-book-jinnah.html

 

[Omar1984]

Before 47 it used to be called India. So why not USI (United States of India) with a more federated tinge to it, taking Muslim/Sikh/Christian sensitivities into view. The subcontinent's Muslims would have been a significant minority. We would be the largest Hindu and Muslim nation on the planet by head count. WoW!

We would have the richness of Urdu and ghazals which Bollywood has lost complete sight of. We would also have some of the best rock bands to call our own!

This is why India and Pakistan are enemies, Indians cant accept the fact that Pakistan exists.

Well, Pakistan is here to stay and its not going anywhere.

 

[Musalman]

Why did Pakistan and India part anyway?

Coz of script. You see Urdu and Hindu are same languages but written in different script, we write it in Arabic script and they in local Devnagari. Just like Dari and Tajik are same languages with different script. This division turned into a religious thing, we Muslim thought that if they be in majority can not stand our script what they will do next. Then in 1912 bengal got partitioned coz it was a big province. The east Bengal become a Muslim majority area, which pissed congress which claimed it was a secular all Indian party. We become suspicious and decided to part our ways.
In 47 things would have been settled but brits deliberately did not settled all the issue therefore since then we are in turmoil.