ICJ likely to rule against China on South China Sea

[Rechoice]

We are the protector of peace in Asia so it is our responsibility keep a safe passage zone in SCS.

China is trounles maker here in East Asia.

 

[BoQ77]

China never specified exactly what the 9 sectioned line means. So it is meaningless for Pinoy to challenge this. China protests other countries drilling for oil within the 9 sectioned line because it violates the 2002 declaration but never took military action against them. ICJ has no role in a diplomatic dispute.

If China "blue" then China has no right to "red". As long as, there's no overlapped zone, every UNCLOS members could enjoy the exploration within their EEZ.
DECLARATION ON THE CONDUCT OF PARTIES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA

 

[Beast]

That may change in 2016 when DPP takes over. It would be a difficult situation for China if Taiwan authorities declare Taiping Island a part of the Republic of Taiwan.

Do not worry friend. China and Taiwan economies are fully integrated. Unless DPP wants an economy crashed, they will not be as rashes as stupid CSB.

 

[haidian]

UNSC has the final say on all international disputes

United States
See also: United States and the United Nations
Ambassador Charles W. Yost cast the first U.S. veto in 1970, regarding a crisis in Rhodesia, and the U.S. cast a lone veto in 1972, to prevent a resolution relating to Israel. Since that time, it has become by far the most frequent user of the veto, mainly on resolutions criticising Israel

US successfully used its veto power in UNSC to protect Israel, otherwise that country would be no more.

China is being nice to the neighbors , if China took those islands by force,which China has more than enough capability to do so, UN can do nothing about it. cause China can veto every proposal or resolution over it.

Look at what US and Russia did during the whole course of UN history, one can easily learn that there has never been justice in UN, UN is just a power struggle arena for big world powers, small and weak countries can never get justice in UN. Might is Right is the only rule in UN and UNSC is the embodiment of this fundamental rule.

 

[TaiShang]

Whoever sits at the P5 table makes the rule. That's it. ICJ ruling does not cut through the SC as historically proven many times.

Like the interesting poll above overwhelmingly proves, China will ignore the Pinoy and Viet to death.

 

[Jlaw]

.[/the case is n

Whoever sits at the P5 table makes the rule. That's it. ICJ ruling does not cut through the SC as historically proven many times.

Like the interesting poll above overwhelmingly proves, China will ignore the Pinoy and Viet to death.

It's best practice to ignore Vietnamese.

 

[sicsheep]

the thief refuted to go to court, it is normal life of criminals.



you lie, Japan taken from vietnam 1939 and given up after WW II 1945. The Island must been turned back to true owner Vietnam. Claim of ROC is rejected by San Francisco conference.

LOL KID, you should read how veto on UNSC works.