ICJ likely to rule against China on South China Sea

[TheTruth]

The law says you have 200 nm territorial boundary if the Islands are administered.
China never administered these islands nor there are any proofs that Chinese have inhibited them. Some Chinese fishermen used to take rest at those places.

Wrong. The Japanese handed them over to China after WW2. Case closed.

 

[Zero_wing]

Wrong. The Japanese handed them over to China after WW2. Case closed.

ya right your crazy we all know that

 

[northeast]

Who cares about what ICJ says.

 

[Aepsilons]

What should China do to the ICJ judges trying to play superpower politics way beyond their jurisdiction and academia qualifications?

What kind of choice list is that ?

lol, biased much ?

 

[Apothecary]

What kind of choice list is that ?

lol, biased much ?

A poll from a chinese who wants to commit murder

 

[Keel]

AFAIK the case was presented by the Philippines. China refused to attend to the court
Any ruling does not have effect on China. It is not enforceable
Period

 

[dichoi]

AFAIK the case was presented by the Philippines. China refused to attend to the court
Any ruling does not have effect on China. It is not enforceable
Period

the thief refuted to go to court, it is normal life of criminals.

Wrong. The Japanese handed them over to China after WW2. Case closed.

you lie, Japan taken from vietnam 1939 and given up after WW II 1945. The Island must been turned back to true owner Vietnam. Claim of ROC is rejected by San Francisco conference.

 

[Keel]

the thief refuted to go to court, it is normal life of criminals.

China does not need to concern about these frivolous accusations
The thief's dirty plot against the rightful land owner is foiled

 

[dichoi]

China does not need to concern about these frivolous accusations
The thief's dirty plot against the rightful land owner is foiled

the thief is still stubborn with such idiot lying. people around the world look down at such aggressive thief: China.

 

[sicsheep]

the ICJ ruling will be useless, it does not legalize the use of force like the UN.
why doesnt Vietnam try to present it to UN security council and see how fast it gets vetoed,.

 

[TheTruth]

you lie, Japan taken from vietnam 1939 and given up after WW II 1945. The Island must been turned back to true owner Vietnam. Claim of ROC is rejected by San Francisco conference.

Nope. The conference did not name a successor and China was barred from that meeting anyway.

 

[dichoi]

Nope. The conference did not name a successor and China was barred from that meeting anyway.

problem is china's claim is rejected by voting on general discussion of San Francisco Conference.

the ICJ ruling will be useless, it does not legalize the use of force like the UN.
why doesnt Vietnam try to present it to UN security council and see how fast it gets vetoed,.

arbitration is independent from UN SC, kid. This is rule of international law. It is joke when China is member of UN SC but does not respect it.

Japan and India will take a seat in SC to keep pearce to the world.

 

[DragonEmpire]

What kind of choice list is that ?

lol, biased much ?

The ICJ has never tried to resolve territorial disputes in the past unless the countries involved already agreed. China did not agree this time. If the Japanese nationality judge tries to resolve the territorial dispute by hijacking the authority of ICJ, then it is the duty of China as P5 UNSC member with veto to arrest the judge and punish him.

China never specified exactly what the 9 sectioned line means. So it is meaningless for Pinoy to challenge this. China protests other countries drilling for oil within the 9 sectioned line because it violates the 2002 declaration but never took military action against them. ICJ has no role in a diplomatic dispute.

 

[Aepsilons]

The ICJ has never tried to resolve territorial disputes in the past unless the countries involved already agreed. China did not agree this time. If the Japanese nationality judge tries to resolve the territorial dispute by hijacking the authority of ICJ, then it is the duty of China as P5 UNSC member with veto to arrest the judge and punish him.

China never specified exactly what the 9 sectioned line means. So it is meaningless for Pinoy to challenge this. China protests other countries drilling for oil within the 9 sectioned line because it violates the 2002 declaration but never took military action against them. ICJ has no role in a diplomatic dispute.

http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=2

 

[Cossack25A1]

What kind of choice list is that ?

It boils down to this - defy/attack China, we will kill you.