What's new

IAF AN-32 Aircraft Missing

This is an IAF statement from their Twitter handle and it was made 4 hours ago.



The a sudden disappearance with out any SOS radio communication means only few possibilities.
A. The plane got shot with a manpad and pilot could not response.
B. SU-30 shot down the plane while defecting.
C. Plane has successfully defected.

what about the conspiracy of missing aircrew were from previous encounters from 27th and this is a cover up op? i dont know if its possible to keep family members in dark for such a long time so as far as i am concerned your possibilities do make sense
 
. . .
All plane crashes in Arunachal take multiple days to find.

June 2009 An32 crash 3 days.
May 2017 Su30 crash 2 days
Jul 2017 Dhruv crash 1.5 days
2013 civilian chopper crash 1 day.

After all Arunachal is centre of hump, where USA lost nearly 700 aircraft including 80 still missing between 1942-45.
Ya...in ww2
 
.
what about the conspiracy of missing aircrew were from previous encounters from 27th and this is a cover up op? i dont know if its possible to keep family members in dark for such a long time so as far as i am concerned your possibilities do make sense
I just need one more statement from IAF to confirm my doubts if they give it will tell you what is actually going on. Now what I said is not conspiracy but evaluation bof situation there are other scenarios possible as well here but they are for later date this whole thing will continue for few days to come.

The Indian media is slowly shifting from crash they are now saying it went off the RADAR.

 
.
Went OFF the radar as in like MH-370? if it crashed than there must be black box beacon, what about the transponders?

velocity, vectors and altitude, 360 degree's from point of contact lost and you have rough search area, if they are not doing it than there is something more to the equation than they are telling
 
. . .
All plane crashes in Arunachal take multiple days to find.

June 2009 An32 crash 3 days.
May 2017 Su30 crash 2 days
Jul 2017 Dhruv crash 1.5 days
2013 civilian chopper crash 1 day.

After all Arunachal is centre of hump, where USA lost nearly 700 aircraft including 80 still missing between 1942-45.
ONE IS MISSING SINCE LAST 4 YEARS TOO . that is as per plan or what ?
 
.
It's the 21st century why are aircrafts going missing in the first place? Why havent some havent even been found yet? Like the Malaysian plane. This is madness. This is what happens when all technologies are used to kill each other and not for the good of the people.
The tracking of an aircraft starts from the moment the aircraft engines start. Ground control monitors the aircraft till the runway from there departure control takes over till radar takes over after take off and then this ends once the aircraft lands at destination or alternate and its engines are switched off. So there is no way the aircraft can stay without someone watching over it at all times.Still the procedure is to issue missing or lost aircraft is after its intended arrival time at destination. Now the aircraft in question lost contact soon after takeoff but till the intended time of arrival no alarm was raised only highlights that the radars that were intended to monitor and the eyes monitoring the aircraft were not capable of identifying and continuously monitor which raises the question that the equipment being used is old or there are training is inadequate.

The Indian media is slowly shifting from crash they are now saying it went off the RADAR.
This is the term used to indicate that an aircraft is lost hence it has crashed or landed where it did not intend.

Went OFF the radar as in like MH-370? if it crashed than there must be black box beacon, what about the transponders?
The issue here is was the aircraft equipped with a black box and ELT transponder. Usually military aircraft do not have these systems due to sensitive information may be stored or emergency location transponder may indicate the location of the crew putting them in harms way.
 
.
The resident tomato conspiracy theorist and half baked economist needs to understand how SOS beacons in An-32 work:
The An-32s are equipped with an emergency locator transmitter (ELT), which remains active for a few days after a crash. It gets activated when the impact of a crash is 20 times that of gravity — or 20g — and works based on line of sight, which means search aircraft have to pass overhead to be able to pick up its signal.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...ng-over-arunachal-pradesh/article27489374.ece

Furthermore, it was a concerted effort from the C-130s, helis, P-81 and the Sukhois. Additional Sukhois were pressed into action only when the other aircrafts/helis couldn't take off due to bad weather.

This is the term used to indicate that an aircraft is lost hence it has crashed or landed where it did not intend.
:tup:
 
.
The tracking of an aircraft starts from the moment the aircraft engines start. Ground control monitors the aircraft till the runway from there departure control takes over till radar takes over after take off and then this ends once the aircraft lands at destination or alternate and its engines are switched off. So there is no way the aircraft can stay without someone watching over it at all times.Still the procedure is to issue missing or lost aircraft is after its intended arrival time at destination. Now the aircraft in question lost contact soon after takeoff but till the intended time of arrival no alarm was raised only highlights that the radars that were intended to monitor and the eyes monitoring the aircraft were not capable of identifying and continuously monitor which raises the question that the equipment being used is old or there are training is inadequate.


This is the term used to indicate that an aircraft is lost hence it has crashed or landed where it did not intend.


The issue here is was the aircraft equipped with a black box and ELT transponder. Usually military aircraft do not have these systems due to sensitive information may be stored or emergency location transponder may indicate the location of the crew putting them in harms way.
That or something else happened that is too embarrassing to admit
 
. .
The resident tomato conspiracy theorist and half baked economist needs to understand how SOS beacons in An-32 work:
The An-32s are equipped with an emergency locator transmitter (ELT), which remains active for a few days after a crash. It gets activated when the impact of a crash is 20 times that of gravity — or 20g — and works based on line of sight, which means search aircraft have to pass overhead to be able to pick up its signal.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...ng-over-arunachal-pradesh/article27489374.ece

Furthermore, it was a concerted effort from the C-130s, helis, P-81 and the Sukhois. Additional Sukhois were pressed into action only when the other aircrafts/helis couldn't take off due to bad weather.


:tup:
And someone who needs a hindu article to understand how elt works is a full baked potato salad

Eversince the an 32 disappeared or shown to be disappeared I have seen Indian media and every India blaming equipment while praising IAF (like they did in last paf oaf engagement). I have seen many of them claiming that an 32 is so old and no one uses it. Which is true that apart from few no one uses an 32. But this doesn't mean that an 32 is bad what Indians so easily forget is that an 32 is based on frame of an 26 and engines of an 12 (a customization made on Indian requests) which means it's actually an 26. And guess what Russia still uses an 26 and they don't fall from sky like flies. It's time IAF stops hiding and start improving
 
.
It gets activated when the impact of a crash is 20 times that of gravity — or 20g — and works based on line of sight, which means search aircraft have to pass overhead to be able to pick up its signal.
20 g is the maximum designed strength of the ELT but if the impact happened at higher than 20 g then the ELT would be destroyed. ELT is designed to be activated by impact something similar to airbags in cars.

IF ELT can only be triggered in cases of 20 g or higher then 99 out of 100 accidents will never be found and constitute Wilful murder. Knowingly putting lives of survivors to die due to product liability for not being a search and rescue equipment.

According to the article you have posted IF IAF personnel knowly accepted a defective product then they should be charged for Treason.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom