What's new

iaf 2025 should be like this to destroy both china and pak airforce

Status
Not open for further replies.

1 naga warrior

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
May 4, 2015
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
Japan
1.290 su 30 mki- upgraded to super su30
2.36 rafale+68 follow on with tot
3.buy 68 pakfa off the shelf if the follow on rafale deal is cancelled even if it is not cancelled.
4. 200 Fgfa - sign the contract and build it before 2019.it wont be a problem coz the prototype airframe will b delivered by russia before 2017.so we will have 268 5th generation planes combined.
5. 220 tejas mk2
6.59 mig 29 upg
7.51 mirage
8. 80 Tejas mk1 as lift + light attack point defense fighter
9.150 and more AMCA specially designed for long range ground pounding both naval and airforce variant with some air to air capabillity.fgfa and pakfa are air superiority fighters with multi role capabillity.

Naval air arm
1. 45 mig 29 k
2. 45 f 35C
3 . 45 ntejas mk2
For carrier operations
4. 2 squadron of F35 b for marines
5. 40 Ntejas mk 1 as lift + base defence light attack fighter
 
You left out IAF's space weapons
Why leave anything to chance ?
 
fap-fap-meme.jpg
 
Do you think, will we sit idle? :D
 
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

Well My Army Of Emos are enough for destroying your future IAF :sniper: :crazy_pilot: :omghaha:

:pakistan:
 
Last edited:
Damm we have a New Kid in the Block...and he is on fire...

Btw it would have been alot better if he would used the word DEFEND instead of DESTROY in the Title...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom