vi-va
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2019
- Messages
- 6,475
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Anglos took that to another level completely by masterminding ethnics wedges between various groups in a country and then let one rule over the other(s). Creating unrest and destabilization which was perfect for indirect ruling. Your country is a direct result of that game. You’ve been played!
Actually slavery IS the point here. Like it or not, all countries in the ME, except for IRI, are minions to the US. No amount of chess beating will alter that fact. And it’s not only in our region. Even economic powerhouses like japan and South Korea are US minions.
The problem with being a minion in the ME is that they are on a tight leash. The most energy tense region must be secured no matter the cost. And the cheapest way is by upholding status quo: the energy producing states keep selling energy at a cheap price and the heavy populated states assist with their cheap labor. All that money generated is spent to buy useless commodities from their masters, such as weapons that will become effectively obsolete the second the master turns his back to you.
You like to mention Shah. Parts of me will always like him. His passion for Iran was undeniable. But ultimately, he was a tool. Iran couldn’t even produce the most simple components during the imposed war due to his policies and all amazing toys we had became useless until, out of necessity, we figured out how to.
In conclusion, entire countries are prisoners and SLAVES to help secure energy. Iran is hated because she refuses to participate.
Like Shah, we have Kuomintang of China or Nationalist Party of China (NPC). It's a alliance of oligarchs and landlords, depends on US. It's a tool installed for manipulation. Some Chinese today still believe we can have a better international environment if we don't have CCP(Chinese Communist Party).
The problem is not CCP itself, the problem is CCP refused to bow to anyone. No matter it's US or USSR in cold war era. So we were isolated by both camps.
China was extremely weak after 100 years humiliations, invasions, inner wars. Chairman Mao fought against any countries who threaten us. So we had Korean War against US in 1950-1953, lost 300 thousands good soldiers. We had Sino-Indian War in 1962 to defend Tibet. We had Sino-Soviet border conflict in 1969.
Many people say it's unwise and unnecessary to fought against US, USSR and India. But Chairman Mao's choice is different. Not surprisingly, Chairman Mao was demonized for decades just like Ayatollah Khomeini.
Pakistan has a huge hostile neighbor - India. Pakistan choose to fight, not bow.