Hyderabad funds case -- UK Court announces verdict in favor of Pakistan

[Maj.Osmani]

 

[Maj.Osmani]

@Indus Falcon @Khafee @DESERT FIGHTER @Icarus @Arsalan

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=261573947534881

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Pakistan should build this as a stepping stone in creating the narrative about the Indian occupation of Hyderabad Deccan.

 

[Areesh]

Nice. Out of 40 new aircraft financing of at least 1 has been resolved.

 

[Kambojaric]

Hyderabad Fund Case: UK court rejects Indian bid to strike out Pakistan’s claim

 

[Areesh]

By the way belonging to a hyderabadi family myself. It is great to see we are still playing our part to support Pakistan even after 67 years.

 

[guest11]

Yet another case of pre-mature celebrations and self congratulations.

The case will now proceed to trial, unless settled. Pakistan had offered to mediate in front of retired Law Lords Lord Hoffman or Lord Hope in July 2015, but India had refused on the basis that it believed Pakistan’s claim was not valid.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1127080...rt-rejects-indian-bid-strike-pakistans-claim/

 

[Areesh]

Yet another case of pre-mature celebrations and self congratulations.

The case will now proceed to trial, unless settled. Pakistan had offered to mediate in front of retired Law Lords Lord Hoffman or Lord Hope in July 2015, but India had refused on the basis that it believed Pakistan’s claim was not valid.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1127080...rt-rejects-indian-bid-strike-pakistans-claim/

No issues. Harna to hai India nai. 4 din late haarai ga. Koi issue nahi.

 

[Sharpshooter12]

And exactly how many millions of pounds have Pakistan and India spent on hiring lawyers for this case.

 

[jermankill]

And exactly how many millions of pounds have Pakistan and India spent on hiring lawyers for this case.

money is not matter over this case its about ego hop u get it

 

[guest11]

No issues. Harna to hai India nai. 4 din late haarai ga. Koi issue nahi.

Khushfehmiyan.....



Hyderabad Funds Case: UK Court Orders Pakistan to Pay India ₤1,50,000 in 67-Year-Old Dispute


After denying Pakistan "sovereign immunity" in the 67-year-old dispute involving the remittance allegedly by the then Nizam of Hyderabad, the British High Court of Justice has ordered Pakistan to pay India ₤1,50,000 as legal fees. The Court also said Pakistan's behaviour in the case was "unreasonable."

The denial of immunity for Pakistan means that India is in a stronger position to recover the money using the legal route.

Besides the Government of India, Pakistan has been ordered to pay ₤132,000 to the National Westminster Bank (Natwest) and ₤60,000 each to the heirs – Mukkaram Jah and Muffakham Jah – of the Nizam of Hyderabad State, which consisted of Telangana, Karnataka and Maharashtra until they were divided into different states.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/hyderabad-...ay-india-150000-pound-67-year-old-case-627007

 

[Areesh]

Khushfehmiyan.....



Hyderabad Funds Case: UK Court Orders Pakistan to Pay India ₤1,50,000 in 67-Year-Old Dispute


After denying Pakistan "sovereign immunity" in the 67-year-old dispute involving the remittance allegedly by the then Nizam of Hyderabad, the British High Court of Justice has ordered Pakistan to pay India ₤1,50,000 as legal fees. The Court also said Pakistan's behaviour in the case was "unreasonable."

The denial of immunity for Pakistan means that India is in a stronger position to recover the money using the legal route.

Besides the Government of India, Pakistan has been ordered to pay ₤132,000 to the National Westminster Bank (Natwest) and ₤60,000 each to the heirs – Mukkaram Jah and Muffakham Jah – of the Nizam of Hyderabad State, which consisted of Telangana, Karnataka and Maharashtra until they were divided into different states.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/hyderabad-...ay-india-150000-pound-67-year-old-case-627007

Run to a year old news if latest news doesn't suit your taste. Nice.

 

[Scharfschütze]

Yet another case of pre-mature celebrations and self congratulations.

The case will now proceed to trial, unless settled. Pakistan had offered to mediate in front of retired Law Lords Lord Hoffman or Lord Hope in July 2015, but India had refused on the basis that it believed Pakistan’s claim was not valid.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1127080...rt-rejects-indian-bid-strike-pakistans-claim/

Why you guys start crying so early... have some heart!!

 

[Areesh]

Why you guys start crying so early... have some heart!!

He is a saffroni Hindutva fanboy. They are more inflammable than petrol. Catch fire very quickly.

 

[guest11]

Run to a year old news if latest news doesn't suit your taste. Nice.

As usual jumping to conclusions without understanding jacksh!t.


With no state immunity for Pakistan over the funds, India has once again got the chance to get the money through the legal process.

According to the Indian government, the ruling of the British High Court of Justice or the English High Court means that the dispute over the ownership of funds can now once again be decided through the legal route, without Islamabad being able to block such proceedings by invoking its immunity.

................................................................

Since Pakistan lost last year, it lost the ability to block India's legal route for getting money. What Pakistan gained today is that it is back where it started.

He is a saffroni Hindutva fanboy. They are more inflammable than petrol. Catch fire very quickly.

More ad hominem.