What's new

Humans should die so humanity can survive

Levvame

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

First of all, I did not see this extraordinary movie recently. I just love this scene more that most part of the movie.

Back to the topic.

The increasing population of the human race makes it difficult for our nature to restore the harm.
Humans consume more and more of the worlds resources. Soon (if not already) will we reach a point were humans consume more than what they produce, or give back to our world.

Which make me think of the famous Agent smith quote.

My brother and I had a conversation about this topic. And we are actually concerned about worlds future. Do we prepare our own end?

I wish some crazy doctor or biologist would develop a virus that could specifically kill 70-80 percent of the human population around the world.

Maybe its a brutal and inhuman thing to think but if this progress keeps continue, world will not be a place we can live.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .

First of all, I did not see this extraordinary movie recently. I just love this scene more that most part of the movie.

Back to the topic.

The increasing population of the human race makes it difficult for our nature to restore the harm.
Humans consume more and more of the worlds resources. Soon (if not already) will we reach a point were humans consume more than what they produce, or give back to our world.

Which make me think of the famous Agent smith quote.

My brother and I had a conversation about this topic. And we are actually concerned about worlds future. Do we prepare our own end?

I wish some crazy doctor or biologist would develop a virus that could specifically kill 70-80 percent of the human population around the world.

Maybe its a brutal and inhuman thing to think but if this progress keeps continue, world will not be a place we can live.

Now there you sound like Twelve Monkeys :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Let me guess...YOU would NOT be in that 70-80%.

Actually i have thinked about were the virus should hit first.

America is dying of being fat so no need to bother them, the birth rate here in Europe is under 2.0 (so we are being less and less)

The perfect places is Asia, and Africa.

but i want it to hit all over the world. Also in Denmark. Maybe me to.
 
.
Actually i have thinked about were the virus should hit first.

America is dying of being fat so no need to bother them, the birth rate here in Europe is under 2.0 (so we are being less and less)

The perfect places is Asia, and Africa.



but i want it to hit all over the world. Also in Denmark. Maybe me to.

well em not a scientist but i had read some where about some bio weapon cant work in whole pakistan cz of its climate changes it may gone have deap impact on the main point but not just in a little area well i told u em not a scientist didnt i ?

and it dsnt mean u must have to Kill every 1 to save this planet u just have to take a start and rest of us will also gone join u but u have 2 take a big step for expml DO u drink cola ? and use perfume or us As or Drive a car dont do this cz all these chemicals Kill ozone and industries also waste their products which are harmfull for earth so dont use computer ? , Fan , Electricity cz its made by burning coal , oil so we are adding more and more co2 in atmosphere grow trees use recyld stuff i dsnt mean recycle bottles and shopping bag i mean fresh milk dirct from cow or goat dont use new soaps cz they also cont chemicals

1st u take a big step and set a good exmpl then maybe we also join
 
.
well em not a scientist but i had read some where about some bio weapon cant work in whole pakistan cz of its climate changes it may gone have deap impact on the main point but not just in a little area well i told u em not a scientist didnt i ?

Im not talking about a bio wapon. I say that the worlds population increase more and more. This exponential development in human population harms the globe.


and it dsnt mean u must have to Kill every 1 to save this planet u just have to take a start and rest of us will also gone join u but u have 2 take a big step for expml DO u drink cola ? and use perfume or us As or Drive a car dont do this cz all these chemicals Kill ozone and industries also waste their products which are harmfull for earth so dont use computer ? , Fan , Electricity cz its made by burning coal , oil so we are adding more and more co2 in atmosphere grow trees use recyld stuff i dsnt mean recycle bottles and shopping bag i mean fresh milk dirct from cow or goat dont use new soaps cz they also cont chemicals

1st u take a big step and set a good exmpl then maybe we also join

I support global warming. Maybe the increasing water levels could stop the humans.

I feel pain in my heart when i see those beautiful animals dissapering forever from our world. Just because humans.

You cant heal nature as long as the world population increase more and more. At some point the world resources will not be enough ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
[video=youtube;IM1-DQ2Wo_w]
Humans consume more and more of the worlds resources. Soon (if not already) will we reach a point were humans consume more than what they produce, or give back to our world.

Dont underestimate the brain of humans beings as they have ability to develop/discover a new world with full of resources. The only problem is unfair distribution of these resources..Some of us have more than what we need and some of us already struggling for survival :)
 
.
Dont underestimate the brain of humans beings as they have ability to develop a new world with full of resources. The only problem is unfair distribution of these resources..Some of us have more than what we need and some of us already struggling for survival :)

Thanks for a serious comment Raja. I'm glad somebody took my topic serious. :)

I agree with you that we should never underestimate the human brain. But can agree on that when "that" time has come, many living creature will be dead because of the increasing human consume? We humans never act before its too late. "Before the sh!t hits the fan"

As long as we don't give the nature "time" to restore itself. It will keep die.

Do you for example know that rainforest areas are begun to be used for farming?
 
.
Thanks for a serious comment Raja. I'm glad somebody took my topic serious. :)

I agree with you that we should never underestimate the human brain. But can agree on that when "that" time has come, many living creature has died because of the increasing human consume?

As long as we don't give the nature "time" to restore itself. It will keep die.

Do you for example know that rainforest areas are begun to be used for farming?

If human consume what they need then it will not be a problem. For example on one side of the world (say USA) you have peoples who waste 30 million tons of food each year while on the other side of the world in Africa you have peoples who are dying because of hunger. We are talking about saving nature, plants/trees, atmosphere, planet etc but here we cannot even save lives of peoples who are getting die because of lack of basic needs for example, food, shelter, medical etc
 
.
If human consume what they need then it will not be a problem. For example on one side of the world (say USA) you have peoples who waste 30 million tons of food each year while on the other side of the world in Africa you have peoples who are dying because of hunger. We are talking about saving nature, plants/trees, atmosphere, planet etc but here we cannot even save lives of peoples who are getting die because of lack of basic needs for example, food, shelter, medical etc

Lets be realistic, there is no way we can save Africa. The climatic circumstances, geographical placement is just not good. Some places of Africa is wort investment because of the mineral resources but those places are already populated like "Congo". The demographical stats can not make anybody happy. Illness, lack of food, fresh water. It needs so many resources to save Africa that no country would do that for "free".

I'm not concerned about Africa, I'm more concerned about western thinking "we own this world".

I read in some article that many farmers in USA had stopped producing food for people. They were instead producing some kind of thing that was used to cars "biofuel". Its pathetic to see how people can be so ignorant and inhuman.

2w66xd0.jpg


Ps. I wanna to give her a high five on her face whit a chair :)
 
.
Lets be realistic, there is no way we can save Africa.

The climatic circumstances, geographical placement is just not good. Some places of Africa is wort investment because of the mineral resources but those places are already populated like "Congo". The demographical stats can not make anybody happy. Illness, lack of food, fresh water. It needs so many resources to save Africa that no country would do that for "free".

I'm not concerned about Africa, I'm more concerned about western thinking "we own this world".

I read in some article that many farmers in USA had stopped producing food for people. They were instead producing some kind of thing that was used to cars "biofuel". Its pathetic to see how people can be so ignorant and inhuman.

2w66xd0.jpg


Ps. I wanna to give her a high five on her face whit a chair :)

I was just giving example that we cannot save many things even if we wish to save them. Its all bout greed and selfishness :)

Actually question we should ask ourselves is

Whether its more important to eat chicken/meat/vegetables/sea food or to let these things survive

Whether its more important to have all sort of furniture and to build new houses/factories after killing trees or to let these trees grow and survive and to stop polluting the air..

we always get something at the cost of others.
 
.
This is not the point. Its ok to fell a tree if you plant two in payback. But we fell 10 trees and plant 1. This is not a healthy progress.

If these animals don't exist we won't exist in the end.

Yes humans are selfish and greedy. I virus could solve this problem. Pure and clean. 80 percent of the world population should die.
 
.
This is not the point. Its ok to fell a tree if you plant two in payback. But we fell 10 trees and plant 1. This is not a healthy progress.

If these animals don't exist we won't exist in the end.

Yes humans are selfish and greedy. I virus could solve this problem. Pure and clean. 80 percent of the world population should die.

I agree with what you are saying but What if we dont have space for planting ten trees?

Haha I dont agree with your solution : Instead of trying to kill 80 percent population with virus. we should put efforts to do something to sustain these peoples..
 
.
Not really a problem the latest outbreak of EV-71 is showing a 95% fatality rate, as people live closer together sanitation worsens and travel gets easier a pandemic is just a matter of time.

Problem is with your idea 80% die you can forget any life in the big cities , no power or water or food. That will kill off most of the rest, end of civilisation scattered bands at subsistance or a little better scavenging off the remains.

Be it escaped small pox, a bio war experiment gone wrong or a random viral mutation it will happen and unlike previous pandemics that were slow to travel this onewill be round the world in 24hours.

On the plus side the removal of 6billion surplus life forms from the planet will give the snow leopard a chance of a come back.
 
.
Not really a problem the latest outbreak of EV-71 is showing a 95% fatality rate, as people live closer together sanitation worsens and travel gets easier a pandemic is just a matter of time.

Problem is with your idea 80% die you can forget any life in the big cities , no power or water or food. That will kill off most of the rest, end of civilisation scattered bands at subsistance or a little better scavenging off the remains.

Be it escaped small pox, a bio war experiment gone wrong or a random viral mutation it will happen and unlike previous pandemics that were slow to travel this onewill be round the world in 24hours.

On the plus side the removal of 6billion surplus life forms from the planet will give the snow leopard a chance of a come back.

I did not know about the EV-71 virus. (i''m not so good in english.)

if we could make 2 billion people survive it would be enough. The proeblem is not that it can be all over the world, but how make a virus that doesn't kill every living human. Maybe we should just let China and pakistan make a war agaist India and Japan. :-) but that will hurt too many architecture and cultural historic things.

Maybe snow leopard can come back, and maybe the living animals in the sea will restore the damage on their species.

how about 50-60 percent? :D

I agree with what you are saying but What if we don't have space for planting ten trees?

Haha I dont agree with your solution : Instead of trying to kill 80 percent population with virus. we should put efforts to do something to sustain these peoples..

And why do we not have place to plant 10 trees? Because we are too many. ;)

Consider that we are 7 billions now, in 2030 we will easily be 8-9 Billions maybe more.

How do you gonna sustain that?
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom