There is regular microwave communication from satellites, why does that not disable the whole world and send us back to the stone age.
How to Avoid U. S. Disablement of Your Nuclear Warheads by Satellites
- Thread starter SatishChandra's Assistant
- Start date
There is regular microwave communication from satellites, why does that not disable the whole world and send us back to the stone age.
Capt.Popeye
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 11,937
- Reaction score
- 12
Wow, there was a response after all. And I was beginning to think that SatishChandra's A$$ is not human but a BOT!
---------- Post added at 10:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 AM ----------
Come to think of it; maybe SatishChandra's A$$ may be right. All the microwaves from satellites must be the reason why humans now need Viagra to function.
SatishChandra's Assistant
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 101
- Reaction score
- 0
Just as not any radio signal will activate or control a radio-controlled model aircraft, not any microwave signal -- microwaves are electromagnetic waves like the radio waves that control model aircraft but of very different frequencies and very different capabilities -- will control a particular piece of digital circuitry. The microwave signal has to have the right information in it for it to disable or control a particular digital circuit.
People confuse microwaves that work in a microwave oven with microwaves that are used for communication. Microwaves in a microwave oven do not carry any information. They are like random radio noise. But the microwaves that carry information to and from a cell phone are highly structured. The same is the case with microwaves from satellites.
There are microwave signals meant for thousands of different cell phones around your cell phone at any time. But only a microwave signal with the right information in it will make your particular cell phone ring; the microwave signals meant for thousands of other cell phones that are also around do not make your cell phone ring. Even the microwave signals meant for your particular cell phone carry different information in them to make your cell phone do different things. For example, if someone sends you a text message saying "Cancelling tomorrow's appointment", the microwave signal that carries this message will have different information in it than a microwave signal that brings a text message saying "OMG, I forgot my appointment with you". The microwave signal from a U. S. satellite meant to disable a particular nuclear warhead will have different information in it from a signal that is meant to make the warhead explode on receipt of the signal, to take an example.
Just as people can 'hack' other people's cell phones, E-Mail accounts or websites and make them do things that the owner of the cell phone, E-Mail account or website can make them do but outsiders are not supposed to be able to do, you can think of the U. S. control of other countries' nuclear warheads or aircraft, etc. as a kind of hacking -- instead of the owner of the nuclear warhead sending a signal to make the warhead explode, the U. S. can send a signal to make the warhead explode, for example -- and the U. S. capabilities for this kind of 'hacking' of digital equipment by microwaves from satellites are so extensive and comprehensive as to be beyond the imagination of anyone who has not seen it; I have seen it.
Shabz Nist
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Messages
- 744
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I learned so much about microwaves from satishchandra's as$. I am attempting to stuff my head in a microwave in the hope of becoming something awesome.
Chogy
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,228
- Reaction score
- 0
Watch out... the microwaves may digitally reprogram your DNA and you'll turn into a snail or an ape.
Galactic Penguin SST
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2017
- Messages
- 1,454
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Obviously microwaves are nothing, as a simple faraday cage can block them. Unlike neutrinos that are unstoppable and indefensible!
The real game ender.
The North Korean Counter Nuclear Weapon V1.1
First posted 18 January 2019; Updated 13 February 2019
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Hint at the North Korean-Iranian Counter Nuclear Weapon Program
3. History Of the Development Of Neutrino Counter Nuclear Weapons
3.1. Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam
3.2. Neutrino-Antineutrino Annihilation At The Z0 Pole Counter Nuclear Weapon
4. Rare Earth Mineral Prerequisite For Laser Researches
1. Introduction
The U.S. nuclear blackmail is only a paper tiger. The nuclear arms era started in 1945 was already superseded by directed energy weapons in the 1947s.
Today, the U.S. nuclear warheads pose no threats to the North Korean strategists.
As revealed back in 2016, this joint Iranian-North Korean directed energy weapon program is already advanced enough to be publicly leaked to outside OSINT analysts.
The neutrino-antineutrino annihilation at the Z0 pole counter nuclear weapon can not only destroy preemptively any nuclear warhead wherever it is located on earth, as far as the opposite side of the planet at 12,756 km and beyond.
But it can also engage any conventional target as well, static or moving, be it humans, robots, machines, depots, factories, submarines, CVs, bombers, missiles, etc...and at the near speed of light.
Unlike the obsolete ballistic missiles, it does not necessarily need to transit through air and space, but its beam of particles can simply follow any geodesic, thus directly penetrating through the earth crust and mantle, making it indefensible.
2. Hint at the North Korean-Iranian Counter Nuclear Weapon Program
Kamal al-Din (1267–1319) was the most prominent Persian author on optics. His research in this regard was based on theoretical investigations in dioptrics conducted on the so-called Burning Sphere.
▲ First hint at the Iranian-DPRK Counter Nuclear Weapon Program. 주체105(2016)년 3월 4일
▲ DPRK Directed Energy Counter Nuclear Weapon Program. Uploaded on December 23, 2018.
3. History Of the Development Of Neutrino Counter Nuclear Weapons
Hirotaka Sugawara et al. have first proposed in 2003, the use of a high energy neutrino beam to destroy nuclear weapons remotely. This hypothesized neutrino beam passes through the Earth and interacts with the nuclear materials inside of the distant nuclear weapon. This interaction can result in heating the nuclear material melting or damaging components of the device or potentially enabling remote detonation of an armed nuclear device.
The neutrino beam makes holding armed nuclear weapons more of a liability than a benefit, as an enemy armed with a neutrino weapon could consider remotely detonating them before they could be launched. Even if the bombs are not assembled, an enemy with a neutrino beam could simply render them useless over time. There is no known method of shielding against these beams.
However high energy neutrino beams themselves might be used as weapons. Sugawara also suggests that this technology can be used as a deadly weapon even against enemies that do not possess nuclear weapons. The neutrino beam can be aimed at people or places and the resulting hadron shower can be deadly. The weapon can be effective even against individuals in deep underground bunkers and other seemingly secure locations.
▲ A muon storage ring is used to accelerate larger particles, muons, to high energies. Muon collisions produce high energy neutrino beams that can be controlled and aimed.
▲ Neutrino beam passes through the Earth and interacts with the nuclear materials inside of the distant nuclear weapon.
▲ The neutrino beam can be aimed at people or places and the resulting hadron shower can be deadly.
Then in 2008, Alfred Tang et al. proposed an alternative idea for a neutrino counter nuclear weapon that shares some similarities with the idea presented by Hirotaka Sugawara et al. but is technologically feasible, relatively cheap and safe.
Tang's idea was to focus a neutrino beam and an antineutrino beam together in a small region to allow them to annihilate so that high energy radiations are released as reaction products.
3.1. Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam
Hirotaka Sugawara (Univ. of Hawaii), Hiroyuki Hagura (KEK), Toshiya Sanami (KEK)
(Submitted on 7 May 2003 (v1), last revised 29 Jun 2003 (this version, v2))
We discuss the possibility of utilizing the ultra-high energy neutrino beam (about 1000 TeV) to detect and destroy the nuclear bombs wherever they are and whoever possess them.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0305062.pdf
3.2. Neutrino-Antineutrino Annihilation At The Z0 Pole Counter Nuclear Weapon
Alfred Tang
(Submitted on 26 May 2008 (v1), last revised 25 Jun 2013 (this version, v4))
Radiations produced by neutrino-antineutrino annihilation at the Z0 pole can be used to heat up the primary stage of a thermonuclear warhead and can in principle detonate the device remotely. Neutrino-antineutrino annihilation can also be used as a tactical assault weapon to target hideouts that are unreachable by conventional means.
I. INTRODUCTION
Nuclear weapon is the most destructive kind among weapons of mass destruction. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are lessons in history that shall never be repeated. Since the end of World War II, world leaders had tried to control the proliferation of nuclear weapons by political means such as the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 1968. Many countries did not sign the treaty. In fact it seems that more and more countries are pursuing nuclear weapon programs nowadays. After September 11, the concern is that nuclear weapons will fall into the hands of terrorists. Strategically speaking the importance of a counter nuclear weapon may soon rival that of the nuclear weapon itself. The purpose of this paper is to explore the possibility of a neutrino counter nuclear weapon technology. The idea of using neutrinos to detonate or melt a nuclear weapon was first proposed by H. Sugawara, H. Hagura and T. Sanami [1]. Their futuristic design is based on a 1 PeV neutrino beam operating at 50 GW. It is unlikely that such an intense ultra high energy neutrino beam can be realized in the near future. Even if such a neutrino beam is made available, its radiation hazard will render it politically nonviable. Other proposals such as installing neutron detectors at the border to intercept nuclear materials had been considered. The current trend of non-proliferation policy is focused on monitoring the production of fissile fuels. Research is being conducted to use anti-neutrino detectors to this end [2]. Anti-neutrinos are produced in nuclear fission through beta decay. They are indicators of the fissile fuel composition of the nuclear reactor. Neutrino signatures of the fissile fuels cannot be tampered with by virtue of the very small reaction cross section of neutrinos at low energy. On the other hand, the small reaction probability also means small detection probability so that large detectors are needed to detect them. A sample idea is to deploy hundreds of kilo-ton liquid scintillator detectors at 1000 km distance from the reactor to monitor the reactor anti-neutrino spectrum. The challenges of using anti-neutrino to monitor reactor are that (1) a rogue nation will not voluntarily allow IAEA to build anti-neutrino detectors around its reactors, (2) the number of anti-neutrino detectors must increase 4 folds for every doubling of reactor-detector distance, and (3) reactors are not needed if a rogue nation opts for uranium instead of plutonium bombs. For these reasons, anti-neutrino detectors are probably not the ultimate solution to non-proliferation. Another possible non-proliferation strategy is to develop a technology that counters nuclear weapons.
This paper proposes an alternative idea for a neutrino counter nuclear weapon that shares some similarities with the idea presented in Reference [1] but is technologically feasible, relatively cheap and safe. The present idea is to focus a neutrino beam and an antineutrino beam together in a small region to allow them to annihilate so that high energy radiations are released as reaction products. The radiations cause neutron spallation in the sub-critical nuclear material and initiate fission reactions. The plutonium heats up, ignites the chemical explosive around the fissile (fissionable material) in the primary stage of a thermonuclear warhead and subsequently detonates the nuclear weapon. The reason of thinking about neutrino for this application is that neutrino cannot be shielded. It can hit a target such as a nuclear submarine from the other side of the globe and can penetrate a deep underground concrete bunker and missile silo. Since neutrino can penetrate the planet to reach a nuclear weapon on the other side of the globe near the speed of light, a neutrino counter nuclear weapon is in principle untraceable and indefensible. It is suggested that a neutrino counter nuclear weapon is 100% effective [3].
The trade-off of developing a counter weapon is the introduction of a new weapon. If the new weapon is less destructive than the original weapon, an ethical argument can be made in support of its development. If remote detonation of a nuclear weapon is made possible by a neutrino counter weapon, a nuclear weapon in the homeland becomes a liability so that there is a real strategic incentive to reduce the stockpile. In that case, there will be a much more convincing political reason to promote non-proliferation. This work aims to study the theoretical feasibility of the neutrino counter nuclear weapon as a first step in this direction. The use of neutrino as a tactical assault weapon will also be discussed.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0805.3991.pdf
Reference:
中微子武器有可能吗？国内研究现状如何？
https://lt.cjdby.net/thread-2523440-1-1.html
4. Rare Earth Mineral Prerequisite For Laser Researches
As discussed above, the development of powerful enough Laser Wakefield Accelerators (LWA) is critical and at the core of this technology. No need to add that such laser research can not be conducted without a sufficient reserve of rare earth minerals, the sine qua non prerequisite in high energy physics.
Indeed, North Korea's 216 million tonne Jongju deposit, theoretically worth trillions of dollars, would more than double the current global known resource of REE oxides which according to the US Geological Survey is pegged at 110 million tonnes.
This amounts to five times that of China's, the current world's first rare earth minerals exporter. Making Kim Jong Un's Korea the military powerhouse the most likely to first succeed in developing and fielding such a new class of WMDs.
▲ First world's reserve of Rare Earth Elements in the DPRK.
The real game ender.
The North Korean Counter Nuclear Weapon V1.1
First posted 18 January 2019; Updated 13 February 2019
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Hint at the North Korean-Iranian Counter Nuclear Weapon Program
3. History Of the Development Of Neutrino Counter Nuclear Weapons
3.1. Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam
3.2. Neutrino-Antineutrino Annihilation At The Z0 Pole Counter Nuclear Weapon
4. Rare Earth Mineral Prerequisite For Laser Researches
1. Introduction
The U.S. nuclear blackmail is only a paper tiger. The nuclear arms era started in 1945 was already superseded by directed energy weapons in the 1947s.
Today, the U.S. nuclear warheads pose no threats to the North Korean strategists.
As revealed back in 2016, this joint Iranian-North Korean directed energy weapon program is already advanced enough to be publicly leaked to outside OSINT analysts.
The neutrino-antineutrino annihilation at the Z0 pole counter nuclear weapon can not only destroy preemptively any nuclear warhead wherever it is located on earth, as far as the opposite side of the planet at 12,756 km and beyond.
But it can also engage any conventional target as well, static or moving, be it humans, robots, machines, depots, factories, submarines, CVs, bombers, missiles, etc...and at the near speed of light.
Unlike the obsolete ballistic missiles, it does not necessarily need to transit through air and space, but its beam of particles can simply follow any geodesic, thus directly penetrating through the earth crust and mantle, making it indefensible.
2. Hint at the North Korean-Iranian Counter Nuclear Weapon Program
Kamal al-Din (1267–1319) was the most prominent Persian author on optics. His research in this regard was based on theoretical investigations in dioptrics conducted on the so-called Burning Sphere.
To see the peace-loving North Korean people as warmongers, only shows how brainwashed one is, being exposed to the 24/7/365 hideous enemy's propaganda.
Indeed, the great Choson people has always stated that its legitimate and only goal was the right of peaceful coexistence among all nations.
As a proof of His goodwill, General Kim Jong Un will no hesitate to contribute to the world denuclearization, if He could in return obtain the withdrawal of all U.S. troops stationed in the Korean peninsula, and lead a reunified Federal Republic of Korea, formula first proposed by Kim Il Sung, another Great Person of the Mt. Paektu.
Moreover, Choson's treasured nuclear sword is nothing compared to its next and still top secret superweapon in development, and known only to a few outside of North Korea, as The Relativistic Through-Crust-and-Mantle (classified) particle WMD, unlocked by having mastered thermonuclear fusion technologies.
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4885/31487803767_7c98fddf26_b.jpg
http://
https://www.flickr.com/photos/arirangmeari/31487803767/
http://
https://www.flickr.com/photos/arirangmeari/31487803767/
3. History Of the Development Of Neutrino Counter Nuclear Weapons
Hirotaka Sugawara et al. have first proposed in 2003, the use of a high energy neutrino beam to destroy nuclear weapons remotely. This hypothesized neutrino beam passes through the Earth and interacts with the nuclear materials inside of the distant nuclear weapon. This interaction can result in heating the nuclear material melting or damaging components of the device or potentially enabling remote detonation of an armed nuclear device.
The neutrino beam makes holding armed nuclear weapons more of a liability than a benefit, as an enemy armed with a neutrino weapon could consider remotely detonating them before they could be launched. Even if the bombs are not assembled, an enemy with a neutrino beam could simply render them useless over time. There is no known method of shielding against these beams.
However high energy neutrino beams themselves might be used as weapons. Sugawara also suggests that this technology can be used as a deadly weapon even against enemies that do not possess nuclear weapons. The neutrino beam can be aimed at people or places and the resulting hadron shower can be deadly. The weapon can be effective even against individuals in deep underground bunkers and other seemingly secure locations.
Then in 2008, Alfred Tang et al. proposed an alternative idea for a neutrino counter nuclear weapon that shares some similarities with the idea presented by Hirotaka Sugawara et al. but is technologically feasible, relatively cheap and safe.
Tang's idea was to focus a neutrino beam and an antineutrino beam together in a small region to allow them to annihilate so that high energy radiations are released as reaction products.
3.1. Destruction of Nuclear Bombs Using Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Beam
Hirotaka Sugawara (Univ. of Hawaii), Hiroyuki Hagura (KEK), Toshiya Sanami (KEK)
(Submitted on 7 May 2003 (v1), last revised 29 Jun 2003 (this version, v2))
We discuss the possibility of utilizing the ultra-high energy neutrino beam (about 1000 TeV) to detect and destroy the nuclear bombs wherever they are and whoever possess them.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0305062.pdf
3.2. Neutrino-Antineutrino Annihilation At The Z0 Pole Counter Nuclear Weapon
Alfred Tang
(Submitted on 26 May 2008 (v1), last revised 25 Jun 2013 (this version, v4))
Radiations produced by neutrino-antineutrino annihilation at the Z0 pole can be used to heat up the primary stage of a thermonuclear warhead and can in principle detonate the device remotely. Neutrino-antineutrino annihilation can also be used as a tactical assault weapon to target hideouts that are unreachable by conventional means.
I. INTRODUCTION
Nuclear weapon is the most destructive kind among weapons of mass destruction. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are lessons in history that shall never be repeated. Since the end of World War II, world leaders had tried to control the proliferation of nuclear weapons by political means such as the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 1968. Many countries did not sign the treaty. In fact it seems that more and more countries are pursuing nuclear weapon programs nowadays. After September 11, the concern is that nuclear weapons will fall into the hands of terrorists. Strategically speaking the importance of a counter nuclear weapon may soon rival that of the nuclear weapon itself. The purpose of this paper is to explore the possibility of a neutrino counter nuclear weapon technology. The idea of using neutrinos to detonate or melt a nuclear weapon was first proposed by H. Sugawara, H. Hagura and T. Sanami [1]. Their futuristic design is based on a 1 PeV neutrino beam operating at 50 GW. It is unlikely that such an intense ultra high energy neutrino beam can be realized in the near future. Even if such a neutrino beam is made available, its radiation hazard will render it politically nonviable. Other proposals such as installing neutron detectors at the border to intercept nuclear materials had been considered. The current trend of non-proliferation policy is focused on monitoring the production of fissile fuels. Research is being conducted to use anti-neutrino detectors to this end [2]. Anti-neutrinos are produced in nuclear fission through beta decay. They are indicators of the fissile fuel composition of the nuclear reactor. Neutrino signatures of the fissile fuels cannot be tampered with by virtue of the very small reaction cross section of neutrinos at low energy. On the other hand, the small reaction probability also means small detection probability so that large detectors are needed to detect them. A sample idea is to deploy hundreds of kilo-ton liquid scintillator detectors at 1000 km distance from the reactor to monitor the reactor anti-neutrino spectrum. The challenges of using anti-neutrino to monitor reactor are that (1) a rogue nation will not voluntarily allow IAEA to build anti-neutrino detectors around its reactors, (2) the number of anti-neutrino detectors must increase 4 folds for every doubling of reactor-detector distance, and (3) reactors are not needed if a rogue nation opts for uranium instead of plutonium bombs. For these reasons, anti-neutrino detectors are probably not the ultimate solution to non-proliferation. Another possible non-proliferation strategy is to develop a technology that counters nuclear weapons.
This paper proposes an alternative idea for a neutrino counter nuclear weapon that shares some similarities with the idea presented in Reference [1] but is technologically feasible, relatively cheap and safe. The present idea is to focus a neutrino beam and an antineutrino beam together in a small region to allow them to annihilate so that high energy radiations are released as reaction products. The radiations cause neutron spallation in the sub-critical nuclear material and initiate fission reactions. The plutonium heats up, ignites the chemical explosive around the fissile (fissionable material) in the primary stage of a thermonuclear warhead and subsequently detonates the nuclear weapon. The reason of thinking about neutrino for this application is that neutrino cannot be shielded. It can hit a target such as a nuclear submarine from the other side of the globe and can penetrate a deep underground concrete bunker and missile silo. Since neutrino can penetrate the planet to reach a nuclear weapon on the other side of the globe near the speed of light, a neutrino counter nuclear weapon is in principle untraceable and indefensible. It is suggested that a neutrino counter nuclear weapon is 100% effective [3].
The trade-off of developing a counter weapon is the introduction of a new weapon. If the new weapon is less destructive than the original weapon, an ethical argument can be made in support of its development. If remote detonation of a nuclear weapon is made possible by a neutrino counter weapon, a nuclear weapon in the homeland becomes a liability so that there is a real strategic incentive to reduce the stockpile. In that case, there will be a much more convincing political reason to promote non-proliferation. This work aims to study the theoretical feasibility of the neutrino counter nuclear weapon as a first step in this direction. The use of neutrino as a tactical assault weapon will also be discussed.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0805.3991.pdf
Reference:
中微子武器有可能吗？国内研究现状如何？
https://lt.cjdby.net/thread-2523440-1-1.html
4. Rare Earth Mineral Prerequisite For Laser Researches
As discussed above, the development of powerful enough Laser Wakefield Accelerators (LWA) is critical and at the core of this technology. No need to add that such laser research can not be conducted without a sufficient reserve of rare earth minerals, the sine qua non prerequisite in high energy physics.
Indeed, North Korea's 216 million tonne Jongju deposit, theoretically worth trillions of dollars, would more than double the current global known resource of REE oxides which according to the US Geological Survey is pegged at 110 million tonnes.
This amounts to five times that of China's, the current world's first rare earth minerals exporter. Making Kim Jong Un's Korea the military powerhouse the most likely to first succeed in developing and fielding such a new class of WMDs.
▲ First world's reserve of Rare Earth Elements in the DPRK.
Similar threads
