That wasn't a reason; that was a statement of facts and a recommendation for change.
Moderation in everything.
Pakistanis have a tendency to think in absolutes. Both extremes.
If only... we had a pan-Muslim Khialafat, all our problems would be solved.
If only... we had a true Muslim leader, all our problems would be solved.
And the other side,
If only... we had free trade with India, our economy would skyrocket.
If only... we recognized Israel, we would be showered with technological marvels.
Both these camps are delusional and are only looking for excuses. A Muslim ummah or leader will not do anything unless Pakistani society changes itself from within. Similarly, Pakistan has not even begun to scratch the surface with its existing relationships -- in the West, Middle East and Far East.
Japan, China and South Korea are more than happy to "shower us with technological marvels", but we have leveraged almost nothing from these relationships.
The problems, like I wrote, are within Pakistani society and all this hand waving is just an excuse not to look inwards and address fundamental issues.
(P.S. I have spelled out those fundamental issues on numerous occasions, including that other thread, so there's no point repeating myself here.)
Yet we are no economic force/tiger in the region. Yes, we have done better than Pakistan. But in absloute terms we are barely managing by(considering population growth as well).
So..what gives?
India has one of the strongest military relationships with Israel; it has a huge diaspora in the Arab world, yet the Iranians deal with India respectfully. The same logic applies with the other players.
Contrast that with Pakistan, where anybody and everybody expects Pakistan to be a doormat and sacrifice its other relationships.
It comes down to expectations and perceptions. India has made it clear that it will deal with countries on its terms, not theirs.
As for Pakistan, well, the less said the better...
Please give your estimate in terms of street power and numbers of one extreme
The anti-West crowd is vocal and probably larger in terms of numbers, but they are powerless. All they can do is riot in the streets and burn a few cars here and there.
The other side -- I wouldn't call them pro-West, because the only thing they are pro- is their own bank balance -- holds the power and dominates the media and politics. As I wrote above, there is nothing wrong with being pro-West (or East or North or South); there is also nothing wrong with being pro-Money, as long as it yields to the primary requirement of being pro-Pakistan.
Pakistan's national interests should not be sold to the highest bidder, regardless of which part of the globe they come from. A good relationship with the West is essential for Pakistan's long term success, but one must know when to put the foot down (as India has done in recent months).