What's new

How China and India had always the biggest Economies for centuries

People from Pakistan gave civilization to your kind starting from 500BC or 2500 years ago. Which you guys call it hindu civilization, mixture of vedic and indigenous religions. And your retardedness is clearly shown when you say reason for being conquered is least civilized lol

If you read about those arabs who actually praised and where they went then you will know exactly what region they were talking about.
The Magadha dynasty was the first great Dynasty of South Asia that was established in eastern India in the 6th century BC.
The successor of the Magadha Dynasty was the Maurya Empire of eastern India that conquered modern Pakistan
and liberated Pakistan from Greek rule and gave its civilization to Pakistan.
One of the earliest Arab scholars who visited India (north and South India) in the 9th century was Sulaiman who stated
that the ruler of the Rashtrakuta Dynasty was one of the 4 great Emperors of the world.
 
The Magadha dynasty was the first great Dynasty of South Asia that was established in eastern India in the 6th century BC.
The successor of the Magadha Dynasty was the Maurya Empire of eastern India that conquered modern Pakistan
and liberated Pakistan from Greek rule and gave its civilization to Pakistan.
One of the earliest Arab scholars who visited India (north and South India) in the 9th century was Sulaiman who stated
that the ruler of the Rashtrakuta Dynasty was one of the 4 great Emperors of the world.

No doubt all that happened after knowledge was passed down from Indus Valley people to your kind. Giving civilization? Again shows your retardness. And you guys keep downgrading arabs lol Arab civilization was far more advance then combined civilizations of South Asia. Even Nehru in his book said it would have been better if Arabs conquered India instead of central asians.
 
No doubt all that happened after knowledge was passed down from Indus Valley people to your kind. Giving civilization? Again shows your retardness. And you guys keep downgrading arabs lol Arab civilization was far more advance then combined civilizations of South Asia. Even Nehru in his book said it would have been better if Arabs conquered India instead of central asians.
Ok you are truly retarded. Speculate all you want. But Historians are still not able to decipher the Indus Valley script so they don't know much about the Indus Valley civilization. The first great Empire in South Asia was established in eastern
India. It was the eastern Indian Maurya Empire that civilized Pakistan. And it was the eastern Indian Gupta Empire that
conquered Pakistan in the 5th century and liberated Pakistan from Scythian rule. The mathematicians of the Gupta Empire like Aryabhata and Bhaskara played a major role in the development of the modern numeral system.
And your former Arab masters admired the Indian civilization. Several medieval Arab scholars admitted that the Indian
civilization was superior to the Arab civilization.

The Arab scholar Yaquibi (895 CE) stated:" The Hindus are superior to all other nations in
intelligence and thoughtfulness. They are more exact in astronomy and astrology than any
other people. The Brahma Siddhanta is a good proof of their intellectual powers.; by this
book the Greeks and the Persians have also profited"

The Muslim scholar Al-Idrisi (1154 A.D.) wrote: "The Hindus are by nature inclined to justice and
never depart from it in their actions. Their good faith, honesty and faithfulness to their promises
are well known and they are so famous for these qualities that people flock to their country from
every side."
 
Ok you are truly retarded. Speculate all you want. But Historians are still not able to decipher the Indus Valley script so they don't know much about the Indus Valley civilization. The first great Empire in South Asia was established in eastern
India. It was the eastern Indian Maurya Empire that civilized Pakistan. And it was the eastern Indian Gupta Empire that
conquered Pakistan in the 5th century and liberated Pakistan from Scythian rule. The mathematicians of the Gupta Empire like Aryabhata and Bhaskara played a major role in the development of the modern numeral system.
And your former Arab masters admired the Indian civilization. Several medieval Arab scholars admitted that the Indian
civilization was superior to the Arab civilization.

The Arab scholar Yaquibi (895 CE) stated:" The Hindus are superior to all other nations in
intelligence and thoughtfulness. They are more exact in astronomy and astrology than any
other people. The Brahma Siddhanta is a good proof of their intellectual powers.; by this
book the Greeks and the Persians have also profited"

The Muslim scholar Al-Idrisi (1154 A.D.) wrote: "The Hindus are by nature inclined to justice and
never depart from it in their actions. Their good faith, honesty and faithfulness to their promises
are well known and they are so famous for these qualities that people flock to their country from
every side."

We can see how much the Iranians love Arabs! ;)

Except the fake wannabe Arabs from the subcontinent...
 
Dont forget aryans were also from central asia/russia. Now go out and defecate openly. :lol:

Open defecation is your behaviour like you did in this PDF and most of its thread including this
Who the heck will care this about so called Aryans ?Our culture and ancestors gave a good definition about Aryans(noble people) in our Vedas .They also wrote who is Aryans and who is Non-Aryans in our Vedas and other records.
You guys and foreign muppets especially Europeans just pronounce this so called word 'Aryan' is also our contribution .Indians contribution.Now stay on topic
Otherwise spit your madrassa education to somewhere else
 
People from Pakistan gave civilization to your kind starting from 500BC or 2500 years ago. Which you guys call it hindu civilization, mixture of vedic and indigenous religions. And your retardedness is clearly shown when you say reason for being conquered is least civilized lol

If you read about those arabs who actually praised and where they went then you will know exactly what region they were talking about.

Very well this thread is about India and China .Not about Pakistan ,Pakistan is nowhere in this list.
It is our own civilization.Pakistan history just started after 1947, a country that is a manifestation of Central Asians Barbarian rule

We can see how much the Iranians love Arabs! ;)

Except the fake wannabe Arabs from the subcontinent...

And we know the strong relationship between India and Iran .
 
This is true, but can you imagine a developed country with 1.3 billion people in it?

China is still a developing country... but due to sheer scale we are already the world's largest manufacturer and energy consumer. If we can maintain a 7% growth rate for the next decade, and enter developed status, imagine how powerful we could become.

Already China's government revenues are about 2 trillion each year, almost as much as the USA. Last decade we multiplied our GDP by six times, even if we can only achieve half of that this coming decade, it will be enough to make us a true economic peer to them, thus ending America's global economic hegemony.

You are right that having a large population increases the probability of driving the next innovation, but that only works if all other factors are equal. However, all other factors are rarely equal, and an average American has far more chance of creating the next successful global company than a non-American does. It's not because Americans are smarter, but they -- and any immigrant to America -- have access to an ecosystem that supports such success.

When Facebook was young, there was nothing special about it. It was one of hundreds of such websites in America, and one of thousands across the world. The reason it became successful is because of the hype created by the American media. That's not to say that many American products are not inherently superior -- of course they are -- but competing products of similar quality from non-American sources have a harder time competing with American brands.

I have often stated that America's greatest asset is the global media domination and its marketing wizardry. It turns American products into status symbols. All through the Cold War, Levi's jeans were a status symbol in the Soviet bloc.
 
Most eloquent post, especially after posting an uninformative one liner.
I look back all the time, does it make me a loser?

What was it that made India and China so dominant in the past?
What was it that caused these 2 civilizations to fall so hard?

Looking back and answering questions such as these, we can avert crisis in the future.
Or we can choose to be cool retards and doom ourselves to ignorance and repetition.

Rise of west, Industrial revolution and colonization, invasions from foreign powers (in case of India) and opium wars, forced treaties in case of China.

We lacked new, sophisticated weapons, tech that west had and it is still true up to much extent.

Plus (at least in case of India) we were fighting each other; we should have kept differences aside and made alliance against British.
 
Most eloquent post, especially after posting an uninformative one liner.
I look back all the time, does it make me a loser?

What was it that made India and China so dominant in the past?
What was it that caused these 2 civilizations to fall so hard?

Looking back and answering questions such as these, we can avert crisis in the future.
Or we can choose to be cool retards and doom ourselves to ignorance and repetition.

For West and other foreigners India and China was always a golden birds.But due to circumstances they excelled in weapons technology ,both of our countries had resources .So we dont need to attack other countries for resources.But other dont have that resources or facilities at that time .So they attacked us.That is why our civilizations fell
 
Back
Top Bottom