What's new

Hollywood gears up to show Pakistan in bad light

They are feeding the world that all this mess in this world is just coz of Pakistan.Every bad thing originates form Pakistan :blah::blah:.

GOP should sue the filmmaker and make example out of them so that no one dare saying wrong things about Pakistan.

Bas*ards..............

may be you should make a movie about what good came out of Pakistan... no one is stopping your film industry.
 
.
OBAMA FAILED !!!

And we don't want that traitor to step foot on Pakistan Again - Assalamualikum my arse where is my shoe
 
.
Its a dam movie, don't look beyond that.

If movies were just that.

They are massive propaganda tool. Believe it or not for many people movies are the only source of information
 
.
Most of the James bond movies always portrayed that Russians are bad and stupid. Recent eg:SALT movie.

Actually its a proud movement for Pakistani's becoz US started to thinking that Pakistan as a threat. Most of the Pakistani expected the same ryt so no issues.
 
. .
what would they show in the movie ???
a raid by a bunch of nuts, mostly killed by now :lol:( there media had made them super heroes but then talibans got half of them down in a second , aaaaaaaaah irony )
sneeking in pak territory at night . and then only the voices coz there was a complete black out !! and then sinking a faceless man wd no evidence if he was really Him ! BTW that movie would be a total flop coz even american dont believe in this fabricated story !
 
.
US probes filmmakers given details of Bin Laden raid
US probes filmmakers given details of Bin Laden raid - Arab News

By JIM ABRAMS | AP
Published: Jan 6, 2012 23:36 Updated: Jan 6, 2012 23:36

WASHINGTON: Investigators are probing whether the Obama administration divulged too many details of the secret raid on Osama Bin Laden to Hollywood filmmakers.

Rep. Peter King, a Republican who heads the House Homeland Security Committee, has questioned how much information was shared about the US special operations mission in Pakistan that killed the Al-Qaeda leader in May.

King on Thursday released a December letter from the Pentagon saying that the inspector general’s office covering intelligence matters “will address actions taken by Department of Defense personnel related to the release of information to the filmmakers.”

King also released a November letter from the CIA saying that its office of public affairs was developing a “single point of reference that will govern future interactions with the entertainment industry.”

King has expressed worries about the administration’s cooperation with Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. and Kathryn Bigelow, director of the Oscar-winning picture “The Hurt Locker,” who is working on a movie about the hunt for Bin Laden.

In August King wrote the inspectors general of the Pentagon and CIA noting a New York Times column saying that Sony and Bigelow had been given “top-level access to the most classified mission in history.”

In his letter, King said that leaks of classified information related to the Bin Laden raid had already resulted in the arrests of Pakistanis believed by Pakistan authorities to have assisted the CIA.

Participation by the Pentagon and the CIA in making a film about the raid “is bound to increase such leaks, and undermine these organizations’ hard-won reputations as ‘quiet professionals,’” King said. He sought information on talks among the White House, the Pentagon and the CIA about providing Hollywood executives with access to covert military operators and asked whether the film would be submitted to the military and the CIA for pre-publication review.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, asked in August about King’s call for an investigation, said claims that the White House had given out classified information were false and that the most specific information the White House had released about the raid came from his daily briefings.

In a statement Thursday, CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood said, “CIA has been open that as part of our public outreach, the agency has over the years engaged with writers, documentary filmmakers, movie and TV producers, and others in the entertainment industry.

“Our goal is an accurate portrayal of the men and women of the CIA, their vital mission and the commitment to public service that defines them,” Youngblood added.

“And it is an absolute that the protection of national security equities is an integral part of our mission.”

Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal issued a statement in August saying the film “has been in the works for many years and integrates the collective efforts of three administrations, including those of Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, as well as the cooperative strategies and implementation by the Department of Defense and the CIA.” The movie is expected to reach theaters at the end of the year.

© 2010 Arab News

Where is the anti-Pakistan portrayal in this article? The articles doesn't even mention Pakistan. Why do you feel that the planned movie on OBL Abbotabad raid is a anti-Pakistan propaganda by US/Hollywood?
 
.
"Is ‘Pack’istan friend or enemy?", " Is ‘Pack’istan going to collapse?" "Is ‘Pack’istan
doing enough against terrorism". “Are ‘Pack’istan’s nucleus weapons secured?” These are general punch lines on US media which drive discussion about Pakistan. The whole narrative revolves around these hyperbolic statements. Then more sensational Hollywood style touch is given to these narratives by think-tankers most of whom are on the board of defense contractors or advisory boards of CIA/Pentagon/State department (media objectivity can take a hike!). It is very unfortunate that Pakistan is viewed on US media through a narrowly defined lens or prism heavily influenced by US government’s policy towards Pakistan. I have been in US for 12 years but I have never seen any effort by any one in electronic media (with the exception of NPR) to try to describe Pakistan as a country of 180 million people with enormous challenges but with huge potentials as well. There is hardly any mention of Pakistanis penchant for democracy and rule of law despite being under military dictatorships for most of its existence. Suicide bombings get more coverage compared to ordinary Pakistanis taking to the street to protest unjust deposing of Chief Justice of Supreme Court and for rule of law. Honor killings are mentioned more frequently whereas there is no mention of Pakistani women flying fighter jets in Air Force. Madrassas and problems associated with them are more generously discussed without any mention of world class higher education institutions of learning like LUMS, IBA and many more such institutions which are producing world class scholars and professionals who are being honored internationally. There is more talk about small but vocal and, at times, violent minority practicing extremism but no one discusses growing middle class who only want to pursue a dream that more or less resembles American dream. Does anyone remember Anderson Cooper standing in knee deep water covering devastating and historic floods in Pakistan just like he covers so many natural disasters around the world?
The question really is does this one dimensional and myopic narrative serve any purpose other than creating more misunderstandings and sensationalizing the issues. Only open, honest and objective discussions and analyses can help both countries move forward. This applies to media in both countries.
 
. .
US media revolves around making profit for the share holders and nothing else so soon or later the truth is replaced with fitional sensationalism..headlines which sell well and anchors which return good profit on investment.
 
. .
It's more of a documentary, anyway.

Why doesn't Pakistan make a video about what US is doing in Iraq/Iran/Afghanistan/Pakistan/Guantamono Bay?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom