What's new

Hindus spewing hatred against Islam/muslims while living in a Muslim country

Yes, that's how faith works. Do you pajeets have proof that your Lord Ram went to Sri Lanka with his monkey sidekick to defeat an evil king with 9 faces? No? Doesn't stop you from doing "pooja" to each and every single one of them, does it?



I don't know, what's wrong with it? Why do you take so much offense when we call you idol worshippers?
There is proof he when to srilanka ,some do puja some do ibadat .my problem starts when both of you guys say mine is the best ,but from where I see both look stupid to me.

I don't take offense,I feel it's stupid.
For example I believe in something and if some other person dsnt believe it so I call him non believer and for the other person you are a non believer and can you call him non believer.simplarly about idol worship.can they call you empty worshippers I am sure you won't take offence .
 
.
Can? Whole India is already saying it. Do you think we need your hypocricy anymore?

Who is " We" here??? Anyway we are not expecting Pakistan or their friends to beleive us anyway..How does it matter, what is your "We" perceive about India??
 
.
There is proof he when to srilanka ,some do puja some do ibadat .my problem starts when both of you guys say mine is the best ,but from where I see both look stupid to me.

I don't take offense,I feel it's stupid.
For example I believe in something and if some other person dsnt believe it so I call him non believer and for the other person you are a non believer and can you call him non believer.simplarly about idol worship.can they call you empty worshippers I am sure you won't take offence .
Buddy, nobody gives a crap whose God is right or whose isn't. What matters is when piddly little humans fuse religion with state apparatus, such as courts of law, in order to push an agenda that by default favours one over the other, e.g. when Lord Ram is plaintiff in a dispute about Lord Ram's temple. I mean seriously....are you not seeing the contradiction here between a "secular" state and its actual functionality?
 
.
"Believe it blindly.." like the "secular court" in the ayodhya dispute accepted Lord Ram as a plaintiff and ruled in his favour? Why do you spew secularism, logic and reason like some verbal diarrhoea on these English language forums, yet when push comes to shove, every layer of state machinery in Hindustan functions on and depends on "blind belief" when determining outcomes even for adherents of different faiths or those of none at all/?
You had to equate the belief with India court order great to know you have put them in the same bracket.
I have a question for you ,since you claim there is no proof and still the court ruled for Hindus ram temple in ayodhya .
There are many proofs where Hindu or other religions places are destroyed and mosque built over them are you ok if they demolish the mosques and build the Hindu or other thing which was in it's place before .
My problem is not with the verdict my problem is with what was done after the babri masjid was demolished.who had been punished
 
.
Not only India, the whole world is saying it.
But do think its right or wrong to blame the whole community for the action of some??
Got my question now??
You think only few Hindus of India are doing that?

Who is " We" here??? Anyway we are not expecting Pakistan or their friends to beleive us anyway..How does it matter, what is your "We" perceive about India??
We = Pakistanis.
 
.
This is exactly the hypocrisy which i was trying to point out in my earlier post....At least, in the Gulf, these people are staying as resident-only...They are still Indian by passport....But if you come to West/US, many people are happy with every loss of the same country for which they are citizens too...
simply vile indian propoganda. Many muslims in west especially us are very much part of the fabric of the nation in fact they are far better integrated than hindus who are divided based on caste and language even here. And muslims are patriotic to their host nations and most people of the world do not blindly worship their nations as idols like you lot do with their bharat mata.
 
.
Buddy, nobody gives a crap whose God is right or whose isn't. What matters is when piddly little humans fuse religion with state apparatus, such as courts of law, in order to push an agenda that by default favours one over the other, e.g. when Lord Ram is plaintiff in a dispute about Lord Ram's temple. I mean seriously....are you not seeing the contradiction here between a "secular" state and its actual functionality?
Secularism is not to appease any one ,if the Muslim board agrees to take land at another place and leaves the disputed land to the ram temple in court what do you want the courts to do.
 
.
and brahmins are unique - their nationalism is worshiping the land and resources as idols while despising the people who live there like kashmiris or south indians .
 
.
It's madness to refer to India as some secular nation where all rights are protected and opportunities distributed equally regardless of caste or religion. It's comical to defend its secular credentials when even BJP members and other politicians trying to outodo BJP openly boast that India does not regard Muslims and Hindus as equal in that nation. It's wonderful that you're continuing to fool white folks with yoga and Bollywood but they would not be so foolish if they actually had to live in this BJP hellhole.
 
.
simply vile indian propoganda. Many muslims in west especially us are very much part of the fabric of the nation in fact they are far better integrated than hindus who are divided based on caste and language even here. And muslims are patriotic to their host nations and most people of the world do not blindly worship their nations as idols like you lot do with their bharat mata.
I have a simple question for the claim you made ,which comes first your religion or your country
 
.
There is proof he when to srilanka

Haha, this I have to see. Also send me proof of the monkey sidekick while you're at it.

my problem starts when both of you guys say mine is the best ,b

Your problem starts when people follow the tenets of their religion?

I don't take offense,I feel it's stupid.

You were crying to us about how we were disrespecting Hindus and their religious beliefs for simply pointing out they worship idols. It sounds like you were a little offended.

For example I believe in something and if some other person dsnt believe it so I call him non believer and for the other person you are a non believer and can you call him non believer.simplarly about idol worship.can they call you empty worshippers I am sure you won't take offence .

I don't think this is stupid or offensive. You are a non-believer and an idol worshiper to me. You can say the same to me. I don't get offended by what Hindus say.
 
.
simply vile indian propoganda. Many muslims in west especially us are very much part of the fabric of the nation in fact they are far better integrated than hindus who are divided based on caste and language even here. And muslims are patriotic to their host nations and most people of the world do not blindly worship their nations as idols like you lot do with their bharat mata.

Are you kidding me??

Do not give me a generic answer...Just browse the PDF and for each thread and you will get your answer...Any way...again, why do i need browse other threads when i can get live example in the same thread itself.....:-):-):-)

and brahmins are unique - their nationalism is worshiping the land and resources as idols while despising the people who live there like kashmiris or south indians .

Why are you all guys have such fetish for Brahmins...??? Again, i am not brahmin guy....Those guys are so powerless in their own country that they have to ask for their own minority status after few decades..

I have a simple question for the claim you made ,which comes first your religion or your country

Million dollar question...I am sure you know the answer.....Why are you making it so cheezy....:cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:
 
.
I have a simple question for the claim you made ,which comes first your religion or your country
Here's what Rishi Sunak - born in Southampton - says:

"British Indian is what I tick on the census...but my religious and cultural heritage is Indian".

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wap.bu...lunch-with-bs-rishi-sunak-115080601060_1.html

2020-03-25-14-37-31--645092524.jpeg
 
.
Here's what Rishi Sunak - born in Southampton - says:

"British Indian is what I tick on the census...but my religious and cultural heritage is Indian".

https://www.google.com/amp/s/wap.bu...lunch-with-bs-rishi-sunak-115080601060_1.html

View attachment 620866

This is not the answer to the question...Rather you should ask if Rishi has to choose between England and Hinduism, what will he choose?

And in the same way, ask the same question to your London Mayor Mr S Khan, if he has to choose between England and Islam, what will he choose?

If you would like to get the real answer and the way Hindus and Muslims have priority for their country and religion, your question should be direct and straight....Here the question is not about some one is India or Pakistani for overseas people....
 
.
Do not give me a generic answer...Just browse the PDF and for each thread and you will get your answer...Any way...again, why do i need browse other threads when i can get live example in the same thread itself.....:-):-):-)

You can get live examples of Pakistanis dreaming of invading and genociding the residents of their host countries in this thread?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom