What's new

Modi is enflaming hatred of Muslims in India, as the world looks the other way

iamnobody

BANNED
Joined
Feb 28, 2023
Messages
1,360
Reaction score
-12
Country
India
Location
India
Modi is enflaming hatred of Muslims in India, as the world looks the other way
ON3pDfau_400x400.jpg

By Rana Ayyub
Global Opinions contributing writer
May 11, 2023 at 7:00 a.m. EDT

Hindu hard-liners, one holding a sword, chant slogans against Muslim communities during a rally in November 2018 demanding a Hindu temple be built on a site in northern India where hard-liners in 1992 had attacked and demolished a 16th-century mosque in Ayodhya Uttar Pradesh. (Bernat Armangue/AP)


India is preparing to host the Group of 20 summit this year, and it is devoting substantial effort to make the occasion a celebration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s rule. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been the leading political force in India since 2014, and it has left its mark on the country.

Modi is keen to highlight the economic transformation he has presided over, making India into an increasingly vital player on the world stage. And he is playing up his democratic bona fides. Posters proclaiming India to be the “Mother of Democracy” meet most foreign dignitaries visiting New Delhi or Mumbai.
But a much darker narrative is starting to define Modi’s India. The government has been systematically oppressing, marginalizing and inciting hatred toward its 220-million Muslim minority. This campaign has been slowly gathering momentum over the years and has reached new levels of intensity today. India is not a healthy democracy.

In just the past four months, Mumbai and adjoining cities in the state of Maharashtra witnessed 50 anti-Muslim hate rallies attended by thousands of Hindus, often led and participated in by leaders of the BJP. I have attended four such rallies all across western India.
I saw vast crowds, from young children to 80-year-olds marching in the streets, expressing Hindu akrosh (Hindu rage), calling for “termites” and “bearded traitors” — all terms for Muslims in Modi’s India — to be wiped from the face of the country. I saw young women dressed in saffron performing traditional folk dances, holding placards asking Muslims to chose between “Pakistan or Qabristan” (Pakistan or the graveyard).

None of this has been spontaneous. Modi himself has been criticized for failing to take responsibility to stop the 2002 riots in Gujarat that killed more than 1,000 people while he was chief minister there — and even for inflaming passions in the run-up to the massacres.


Members of the BJP have continued to stoke hatred and intercommunal tensions since then. In but one recent example, Devendra Fadnavis, deputy chief minister of Maharashtra, held a rally last month in Ayodhya, near where a Hindu mob famously demolished the iconic Babri mosque in 1992. Modi’s government is planning to consecrate a new Hindu temple on the same site ahead of the 2024 general elections. Fadnavis was there to drive the point home. “Whether you [say it out loud] or not,” he said before a crowd, “the fact is India has a Hindu majority. And in that sense, it is already a Hindu rashtra (state).”
Last month, another provincial minister of the Modi government, who heads the northern state of Uttarakhand, stated that the Modi government would not tolerate “land jihad” — a dangerous dog-whistle to extremists who believe that Muslim immigrants are buying up land to displace the Hindu majority.
The poisonous rhetoric is having an effect. Shortly after these speeches, during celebrations commemorating the birth of Lord Rama, multiple attacks took place all over the country. The most prominent attack saw about 1,000 Hindu rioters set fire to a century-old Muslim religious school in the northern state of Bihar. The school’s library was burned down.

The dangerous provocations continue. “Tolerant Muslims can be counted on fingers. Their numbers are not even in thousands,” Satya Pal Singh Baghel, Modi’s minister of state for law and justice said at a rally this week. “Even that is a tactic. It is to stay in public life with a mask.” Meanwhile, Modi was praising an extremely Islamophobic new film at a rally ahead of local elections this month.



Outside of several civil society groups that are standing up for a pluralistic India and Muslim rights, the Supreme Court has been the most powerful check on the BJP. But even among the country’s highest judges, there is a sense of exasperated helplessness. “The state is impotent, the state is powerless. It does not act in time. Why do we have a state at all if it is remaining silent?” Justice K.M. Joseph exclaimed during a recent hearing, during which he condemned local BJP authorities for not prosecuting hate-speech violations at a rally.
As foreign dignitaries and celebrities continue to visit India ahead of the G-20 summit, they must not turn a blind eye to what is happening. As Zendaya, Gigi Hadid, Tom Holland and Penélope Cruz flocked to Mumbai for the opening of a major new cultural center, Hindu mobs danced to music glorifying the extermination of Muslims, brandishing swords outside mosques. And around the time that Modi welcomed the Australian, Japanese and Italian prime ministers and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, three Muslims were reportedly lynched.
Modi is making the case that he is an irreplaceable global leader who holds the key to world peace. Western leaders are looking to him as a partner to stand firm against a rising China and to push back on Russia’s naked aggression in Ukraine. Never before in his career of Hindu nationalist politics has Modi found himself more emboldened. It’s unconscionable that the international community remains silent in the face of what is going on.
266Comments


@Joe Shearer @-=virus=- @khansaheeb @fitpOsitive @jamahir @villageidiot @Skimming
 
Rana Ayub be like: I only accept Muslim killings when it’s done by Chinese, Muslims or Arabs. I don’t accept it when it’s done by Hindus, Jews and Christians.
 
Rana is a 40 year old single lady. No wants her stale loose p*ssy.

Aap unki khujli Mita do thikh ho jayegi.

View attachment 929219

Its like a nobody saying “i dont want to have big house, big car and million dollar company” .. yeah right, like if you could even if you wanted to

No muslim woman want to have anything to do with men who literally worship cows and shit.
 
Its like a nobody saying “i dont want to have big house, big car and million dollar company” .. yeah right, like if you could even if you wanted to

No muslim woman want to have anything to do with men who literally worship cows and shit.
She wants to do Ghar wapsi. But no one wants her untouchable Muslim paleet as* back in Dharmic fold.

images (55).jpeg
 
Modi is enflaming hatred of Muslims in India, as the world looks the other way
View attachment 929216
By Rana Ayyub
Global Opinions contributing writer
May 11, 2023 at 7:00 a.m. EDT

Hindu hard-liners, one holding a sword, chant slogans against Muslim communities during a rally in November 2018 demanding a Hindu temple be built on a site in northern India where hard-liners in 1992 had attacked and demolished a 16th-century mosque in Ayodhya Uttar Pradesh. (Bernat Armangue/AP)


India is preparing to host the Group of 20 summit this year, and it is devoting substantial effort to make the occasion a celebration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s rule. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been the leading political force in India since 2014, and it has left its mark on the country.

Modi is keen to highlight the economic transformation he has presided over, making India into an increasingly vital player on the world stage. And he is playing up his democratic bona fides. Posters proclaiming India to be the “Mother of Democracy” meet most foreign dignitaries visiting New Delhi or Mumbai.
But a much darker narrative is starting to define Modi’s India. The government has been systematically oppressing, marginalizing and inciting hatred toward its 220-million Muslim minority. This campaign has been slowly gathering momentum over the years and has reached new levels of intensity today. India is not a healthy democracy.

In just the past four months, Mumbai and adjoining cities in the state of Maharashtra witnessed 50 anti-Muslim hate rallies attended by thousands of Hindus, often led and participated in by leaders of the BJP. I have attended four such rallies all across western India.
I saw vast crowds, from young children to 80-year-olds marching in the streets, expressing Hindu akrosh (Hindu rage), calling for “termites” and “bearded traitors” — all terms for Muslims in Modi’s India — to be wiped from the face of the country. I saw young women dressed in saffron performing traditional folk dances, holding placards asking Muslims to chose between “Pakistan or Qabristan” (Pakistan or the graveyard).

None of this has been spontaneous. Modi himself has been criticized for failing to take responsibility to stop the 2002 riots in Gujarat that killed more than 1,000 people while he was chief minister there — and even for inflaming passions in the run-up to the massacres.


Members of the BJP have continued to stoke hatred and intercommunal tensions since then. In but one recent example, Devendra Fadnavis, deputy chief minister of Maharashtra, held a rally last month in Ayodhya, near where a Hindu mob famously demolished the iconic Babri mosque in 1992. Modi’s government is planning to consecrate a new Hindu temple on the same site ahead of the 2024 general elections. Fadnavis was there to drive the point home. “Whether you [say it out loud] or not,” he said before a crowd, “the fact is India has a Hindu majority. And in that sense, it is already a Hindu rashtra (state).”
Last month, another provincial minister of the Modi government, who heads the northern state of Uttarakhand, stated that the Modi government would not tolerate “land jihad” — a dangerous dog-whistle to extremists who believe that Muslim immigrants are buying up land to displace the Hindu majority.
The poisonous rhetoric is having an effect. Shortly after these speeches, during celebrations commemorating the birth of Lord Rama, multiple attacks took place all over the country. The most prominent attack saw about 1,000 Hindu rioters set fire to a century-old Muslim religious school in the northern state of Bihar. The school’s library was burned down.

The dangerous provocations continue. “Tolerant Muslims can be counted on fingers. Their numbers are not even in thousands,” Satya Pal Singh Baghel, Modi’s minister of state for law and justice said at a rally this week. “Even that is a tactic. It is to stay in public life with a mask.” Meanwhile, Modi was praising an extremely Islamophobic new film at a rally ahead of local elections this month.



Outside of several civil society groups that are standing up for a pluralistic India and Muslim rights, the Supreme Court has been the most powerful check on the BJP. But even among the country’s highest judges, there is a sense of exasperated helplessness. “The state is impotent, the state is powerless. It does not act in time. Why do we have a state at all if it is remaining silent?” Justice K.M. Joseph exclaimed during a recent hearing, during which he condemned local BJP authorities for not prosecuting hate-speech violations at a rally.
As foreign dignitaries and celebrities continue to visit India ahead of the G-20 summit, they must not turn a blind eye to what is happening. As Zendaya, Gigi Hadid, Tom Holland and Penélope Cruz flocked to Mumbai for the opening of a major new cultural center, Hindu mobs danced to music glorifying the extermination of Muslims, brandishing swords outside mosques. And around the time that Modi welcomed the Australian, Japanese and Italian prime ministers and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, three Muslims were reportedly lynched.
Modi is making the case that he is an irreplaceable global leader who holds the key to world peace. Western leaders are looking to him as a partner to stand firm against a rising China and to push back on Russia’s naked aggression in Ukraine. Never before in his career of Hindu nationalist politics has Modi found himself more emboldened. It’s unconscionable that the international community remains silent in the face of what is going on.
266Comments


@Joe Shearer @-=virus=- @khansaheeb @fitpOsitive @jamahir @villageidiot @Skimming
The same author whose book was trashed by Courts in India as an "assumption" since she never brought any evidence to light. Even if she thought that the Indian govt is biased, she could have shared it with NYTimes, Washington Post, and Al Jazeera among other Islamic newspapers.
She is alleged done financial misappropriation, where she took around 2Cr as a donation in the name of Coronavirus support and then transferred to her father's bank account.
Yes, we belive her completely.
 
The same author whose book was trashed by Courts in India as an "assumption" since she never brought any evidence to light. Even if she thought that the Indian govt is biased, she could have shared it with NYTimes, Washington Post, and Al Jazeera among other Islamic newspapers.
She is alleged done financial misappropriation, where she took around 2Cr as a donation in the name of Coronavirus support and then transferred to her father's bank account.
Yes, we belive her completely.
She presented facts in her book. Onus is on agencies to pursue the case.
Courts do not rely on books for their judgement.
If you have read the book you will understand you will corelate it with incedents.
 
She presented facts in her book. Onus is on agencies to pursue the case.
Courts do not rely on books for their judgement.
If you have read the book you will understand you will corelate it with incedents.
Boss, I can allege that you are a killer and rapist of tansgenders. Does this mean that someone has to provide the evidence or onus to present evidence lies to me??

Think again, there is a difference between flying kites and providing pieces of evidence.
 
Boss, I can allege that you are a killer and rapist of tansgenders. Does this mean that someone has to provide the evidence or onus to present evidence lies to me??

Think again, there is a difference between flying kites and providing pieces of evidence.
Yes you can make that allegation.
In case of gujarat. investigation was conduected under soupreme courte appointed SIT and convicted many.
It is gujarat government which is diluting the cases and releasing culprits.
Coming back to Rana Ayub's book, it covers those aspects of case which are also availble in public domain. And also some facts which were reveald in her investigation as journalist.

If you have read the book you will find that Maya kodnani case as proceeded in courts, is accurately dealt in the book.
(and next time try not making personal attack if dont have arguement)
 

Back
Top Bottom