What's new

Here’s which countries execute the most people

Then it is all the more fortunate that Chinese laws are not applied in India.

The number is likely to go up dramatically....

https://www.statnews.com/2017/06/23/china-death-penalty-research-fraud/

Chinese courts call for death penalty for researchers who commit fraud
By IVAN ORANSKY @ivanoransky and ADAM MARCUS @armarcus

JUNE 23, 2017

GettyImages-154733025-645x645.jpg

ED JONES/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth — a life for a lab book?

In the past few months, China has announced two new crackdowns on research misconduct — one of which could lead to executions for scientists who doctor their data.

Scientists have been sounding alarms for years about the integrity of research in China. One recent survey estimated that 40 percent of biomedical papers by Chinese scholars were tainted by misconduct. Funding bodies there have in the past announced efforts to crack down on fraud, including clawing back money from scientists who cheat on their grants.

This month, in the wake of a fake peer review scandal that claimed 107 papersby Chinese scholars, the country’s Ministry of Science and Technology proclaimed a “no tolerance” policy for research misconduct — although it’s not clear what that might look like. According to the Financial Times, the ministry said the mass retractions “seriously harmed the international reputation of our country’s scientific research and the dignity of Chinese scientists at large.”

But a prior court decision in the country threatened the equivalent of the nuclear option. In April courts approved a new policy calling for stiff prison sentences for researchers who fabricate data in studies that lead to drug approvals. If the misconduct ends up harming people, then the punishment on the table even includes the death penalty. The move, as Nature explained, groups clinical trial data fraud with counterfeiting so that “if the approved drug causes health problems, it can result in a 10-year prison term or the death penalty, in the case of severe or fatal consequences.”

We’ve long called for sterner treatment of science cheats, including the possibility of jail time — which, by the way, most Americans agree is appropriate. But we can’t support the Chinese solution. Even if we didn’t abhor the death penalty (which we do), the punishment here far outweighs the crime.

Yet if extremity in the name of virtue can be vice, it serves as reminder that science fraud is, simply put, fraud. And when it involves funding — taxpayer or otherwise — that fraud becomes theft. Think about it the same way as you would running a bogus investment fund or kiting checks. So, jail for major offenders — yes. Execution — no.

One objection to our position here might be that financial criminals typically don’t kill anyone — directly, at least. If you drain my bank account or steal my 401(k), I’m still alive. A scientist who cheats on a drug study could, at least in theory, jeopardize the health of the people who take that medication, with potentially fatal consequences.

But the reality is quite different. In the United States, at least, drug approvals hinge on data generated from many scientists or groups of researchers. They never rest on a single person. So unless everyone involved in a study is cheating, a fraudster’s data would stick out if they strayed too much from the aggregate. Ironically, then, to succeed, a would-be fraudster would be most successful if they made their bogus results look like everyone else’s — thus diluting their influence on the outcome of the trial.

And stopping short of capital punishment, jail time for fraud would itself be a big change. According to our own research, only 39 scientists worldwide between 1975 and 2015 received criminal penalties for misdeeds somehow related to their work. However, some of those cases didn’t involve research directly but instead related to incidental infractions, such as misusing funds, bribery, and even murder facilitated by access to cyanide.

And in the United States, fewer than 2 percent of the 250-plus cases of misconduct over the same period reported by the Office of Research Integrity resulted in criminal sanctions. Most of the time, fraudsters earn temporary bans on federal research funding, with some dusting themselves off after a timeout and getting back in the game.

So there’s room to strengthen penaltieswithout taking the draconian step of invoking the death penalty. Some of that may requiring rewriting relevant statutes, to give agencies overseeing research funds more authority. And we acknowledge that not everyone thinks criminal sanctions are a good idea; some have said that such sanctions would only encourage fraudsters to double down on attempts at denial through lawyers, and might even dissuade colleagues from blowing the whistle. That’s certainly possible, but it’s not as though investigators’ close rate is so high at this point anyway.
 
http://www.businessinsider.com/top-countries-death-penalty-executions-usa-most-people-2017-4

At least 1,032 people were executed in 2016, according to a new Amnesty Internationalreport published this month.

The report, which has the most available stats on executions around the world, found that the number of executions was an estimated 37% lower than in 2015. However, that number doesn't include thousands of undocumented deaths - mostly carried out in China.

Because not every country releases information on their government's use of the death penalty, the figures in this map are the minimum numbers, but are most likely to be higher.

To accommodate this, a "+" is added to countries that probably have more executions than the base number Amnesty International was able to confirm. You can read more about the research here.

bi-graphicscountries-with-most-executions.png
It is really a strange that Iran where the most execution occurred in 2016.. Pakistan stands with 87+ not good not bad....
 
Zheng Xiaoyu - Wikipedia

Zheng Xiaoyu (Chinese: 郑筱萸; pinyin: Zhèng Xiǎoyú; December 21, 1944[not verified in body] – July 10, 2007) was the director of the State Food and Drug Administration of the People's Republic of China from 2003 to 2005. He was sentenced to death for corruption[1] and allowing possibly tainted products in Mainland China[not verified in body] in the first instance trial at Beijing No.1 Intermediate Court on May 29, 2007.[2] He was executed on July 10, 2007.
 
The number is likely to go up dramatically....

https://www.statnews.com/2017/06/23/china-death-penalty-research-fraud/

Chinese courts call for death penalty for researchers who commit fraud
By IVAN ORANSKY @ivanoransky and ADAM MARCUS @armarcus

JUNE 23, 2017

GettyImages-154733025-645x645.jpg

ED JONES/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth — a life for a lab book?

In the past few months, China has announced two new crackdowns on research misconduct — one of which could lead to executions for scientists who doctor their data.

Scientists have been sounding alarms for years about the integrity of research in China. One recent survey estimated that 40 percent of biomedical papers by Chinese scholars were tainted by misconduct. Funding bodies there have in the past announced efforts to crack down on fraud, including clawing back money from scientists who cheat on their grants.

This month, in the wake of a fake peer review scandal that claimed 107 papersby Chinese scholars, the country’s Ministry of Science and Technology proclaimed a “no tolerance” policy for research misconduct — although it’s not clear what that might look like. According to the Financial Times, the ministry said the mass retractions “seriously harmed the international reputation of our country’s scientific research and the dignity of Chinese scientists at large.”

But a prior court decision in the country threatened the equivalent of the nuclear option. In April courts approved a new policy calling for stiff prison sentences for researchers who fabricate data in studies that lead to drug approvals. If the misconduct ends up harming people, then the punishment on the table even includes the death penalty. The move, as Nature explained, groups clinical trial data fraud with counterfeiting so that “if the approved drug causes health problems, it can result in a 10-year prison term or the death penalty, in the case of severe or fatal consequences.”

We’ve long called for sterner treatment of science cheats, including the possibility of jail time — which, by the way, most Americans agree is appropriate. But we can’t support the Chinese solution. Even if we didn’t abhor the death penalty (which we do), the punishment here far outweighs the crime.

Yet if extremity in the name of virtue can be vice, it serves as reminder that science fraud is, simply put, fraud. And when it involves funding — taxpayer or otherwise — that fraud becomes theft. Think about it the same way as you would running a bogus investment fund or kiting checks. So, jail for major offenders — yes. Execution — no.

One objection to our position here might be that financial criminals typically don’t kill anyone — directly, at least. If you drain my bank account or steal my 401(k), I’m still alive. A scientist who cheats on a drug study could, at least in theory, jeopardize the health of the people who take that medication, with potentially fatal consequences.

But the reality is quite different. In the United States, at least, drug approvals hinge on data generated from many scientists or groups of researchers. They never rest on a single person. So unless everyone involved in a study is cheating, a fraudster’s data would stick out if they strayed too much from the aggregate. Ironically, then, to succeed, a would-be fraudster would be most successful if they made their bogus results look like everyone else’s — thus diluting their influence on the outcome of the trial.

And stopping short of capital punishment, jail time for fraud would itself be a big change. According to our own research, only 39 scientists worldwide between 1975 and 2015 received criminal penalties for misdeeds somehow related to their work. However, some of those cases didn’t involve research directly but instead related to incidental infractions, such as misusing funds, bribery, and even murder facilitated by access to cyanide.

And in the United States, fewer than 2 percent of the 250-plus cases of misconduct over the same period reported by the Office of Research Integrity resulted in criminal sanctions. Most of the time, fraudsters earn temporary bans on federal research funding, with some dusting themselves off after a timeout and getting back in the game.

So there’s room to strengthen penaltieswithout taking the draconian step of invoking the death penalty. Some of that may requiring rewriting relevant statutes, to give agencies overseeing research funds more authority. And we acknowledge that not everyone thinks criminal sanctions are a good idea; some have said that such sanctions would only encourage fraudsters to double down on attempts at denial through lawyers, and might even dissuade colleagues from blowing the whistle. That’s certainly possible, but it’s not as though investigators’ close rate is so high at this point anyway.

Despicable. How can the ending of human life be handled in such a casual manner? As if retributive justice was not bad enough, extending it so far out reverses any so-called development that a society claims to have achieved.

CIA, Israel, the SA and UAE regimes!




Yes, for rapists it's definitely a positive thing.

I have no time for your retributive bloodlust masquerading as justice. You are a pathological person who just wants other humans to suffer, and a justice system based in a brutal religious background gives you ample scope to camouflage your true desires.

And BTW, you do know the standard for evidence for rape under your archaic religious laws, don't you? You do not even wish to deliver justice to anyone, as long as it serves as an excuse for killing someone, which gives meaning to your pathetic existence.
 
I have no time for your retributive bloodlust masquerading as justice. You are a crazy person who just wants other humans to suffer, and a justice system based in a brutal religious background gives you ample scope to camouflage your true desires.

You have no time for my 'retributive blood lust' but somehow you manage time for a reply! Well, what can we say? We are evil for we seek justice for the victims, while you are an angel for you seek protection for the rapists.
 
china and Pakistan has a lot to lean about human rights , i'm however surprised to see India isn't even in the top 20 , being the the 2nd most populous nation they aren't even in the top 10

Funny thing is, a bunch of crypto-barbarians are also explaining to everyone as to how killing thousands of people every year in the name of justice is essential to serving justice. As if savages know what justice is.
 
Despicable. How can the ending of human life be handled in such a casual manner?.

Simple...there is a demand for it. But not the demand you think it is.
China's tansplant operations hit over 10,000 in 2008. However there was no organ donation system. That means all those transplants came from prisoners....10,000 (and remember many "donors" don't match so the number is actually far higher). As China's people become richer they will be more able to pay for transplants...and the execution number will go up and up and up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...minals-executed-organs-sold-black-market.html

China's hi-tech 'death van' where criminals are executed and then their organs are sold on black market

March 2009: Death will come soon for Jiang Yong. A corrupt local planning official with a taste for the high life, Yong solicited money from businessmen eager to expand in China's economic boom.

Showering gifts on his mistress, known as Madam Tang, the unmarried official took more than £1 million in bribes from entrepreneurs wanting permission to build skyscrapers on land which had previously been protected from development.

But Yong, a portly, bespectacled figure, was caught by the Chinese authorities during a purge on corrupt local officials last year.

He confessed and was sentenced to death. China executed 1,715 people last year, so one more death would hardly be remarkable.

article-0-04220B97000005DC-153_468x363.jpg

Disguised: The execution vehicle looks like a normal police van

But there will be nothing ordinary about Yong's death by lethal injection. Unless he wins an appeal, he will draw his final breath strapped inside a vehicle that has been specially developed to make executions more cost-effective and efficient.

In chilling echoes of the 'gas-wagon' project pioneered by the Nazis to slaughter criminals, the mentally ill and Jews, this former member of the China People's Party will be handcuffed to a so-called 'humane' bed and executed inside a gleaming new, hi-tech, mobile 'death van.'

After trials of the mobile execution service were launched quietly three years ago - then hushed up to prevent an international row about the abuse of human rights before the Olympics last summer - these vehicles are now being deployed across China.

The number of executions is expected to rise to a staggering 10,000 people this year (not an impossible figure given that at least 68 crimes - including tax evasion and fraud - are punishable by death in China).

Developed by Jinguan Auto, which also makes bullet-proof limousines for the new rich in this vast country of 1.3 billion people, the vans appear unremarkable.

They cost £60,000, can reach top speeds of 80mph and look like a police vehicle on patrol. Inside, however, the 'death vans' look more like operating theatres.

Executions are monitored by video to ensure they comply with strict rules, making it possible to describe precisely how Jiang Yong will die. After being sedated at the local prison, he will be loaded into the van and strapped to an electric-powered stretcher.

This then glides automatically towards the centre of the van, where doctors will administer three drugs: sodium thiopental to cause unconsciousness; pancuronium bromide to stop breathing and, finally, potassium chloride to stop the heart.

Death is reputed to be quick and painless - not that there is anyone to testify to this. The idea for such a 'modern' scheme is rooted in one of the darkest episodes in human history.

The Nazis used adapted vans as mobile gas chambers from 1940 until the end of World War II. In order to make the best use of time spent transporting criminals and Jewish prisoners, Hitler's scientists developed the vehicles with a hermetically sealed cabin that was filled with carbon monoxide carried by a tube from the exhaust pipes.

The vans were first tested on child patients in a Polish psychiatric hospital in 1940. The Nazis then developed bigger models to carry up to 50 prisoners. They looked like furniture removal vans. Those to be killed were ordered to hand over their valuables, then stripped and locked inside.

As gas was pumped into the container and the van headed towards graves being dug by other prisoners, the muffled cries of those inside could be heard, along with banging on the side.

With the 'cargo' dead, all that remained was for gold fillings to be hacked from the victims' mouths, before the bodies were tipped into the graves.

Now, six decades later, just like the Nazis, China insists these death vans are 'progress'.

The vans save money on building execution facilities in prisons or courts. And they mean that prisoners can be executed locally, closer to communities where they broke the law.

article-1165416-042246A3000005DC-822_468x319.jpg

The Nazi gas van: It killed up to 50 prisoners at a time

'This deters others from committing crime and has more impact,' said one official.

Indeed, a spokesman for the makers of the 'death vans' openly touted for trade this week, saying they are the perfect way to 'efficiently and cleanly' dispatch convicts with lethal injections. Reporting steady sales throughout China, a spokesman for Jinguan Auto - which is situated in a green valley an hour's drive from Chongqing in south-western China - said the firm was bucking the economic trend and had sold ten more vans recently.

The exact number in operation is a state secret. But it is known that Yunnan province alone has 18 mobile units, while dozens of others are patrolling in five other sprawling provinces. Each van is the size of a specially refitted 17-seater minibus.

'We have not sold our execution cars to foreign countries yet,' beamed a proud spokesman. But if they need one, they could contact our company directly.'

Officials say the vehicles are a 'civilised alternative' to the traditional single shot to the head (used in 60 per cent of Chinese executions), ending the life of the condemned quickly, clinically and safely - proving that China 'promotes human rights now,' says Kang Zhongwen, designer of the 'death van'.

It seems a perverse claim, but certainly the shootings can be gruesome. Once carried out in public parks, these executions -sometimes done in groups - have seen countless cases of prisoners failing to die instantly and writhing in agony on the ground before being finished off.

There are other concerns: soldiers carrying out the shooting complain that they are splashed with Aids-contaminated blood. After the shooting, relatives are often presented with the bullet hacked from the condemned's body - and forced to pay the price of the ammunition.

While posing as a modernising force in public, Chinese leaders remain brutal within their own borders. They are, however, anxious to be seen to be moving away from violence against their own people, stressing that all judicial decisions have been taken out of the hands of vengeful local officials and must be ruled on from Beijing.

China has traditionally always taken a ruthless, unemotional view of crime and punishment. Before injections and bullets, the most chilling sentence was death by Ling Chi - death by a thousand cuts - which was abolished only in 1905.

The condemned man was strapped to a table and then, in what was also known as 'slow slicing', his eyes were gouged out.

This was designed to heighten the terror of not being able to see what part of his body would suffer next. Using a sharp knife, the executioner sliced at the condemned's body - chopping off the ears, fingers, nose and toes, before starting to cut off whole limbs.

Traditionalists insisted that exactly 3,600 slices were made. The new mobile execution vans may, indeed, be more humane than this, but their main advantage in official eyes is financial.

According to undercover investigations by human rights' groups, the police, judiciary and doctors are all involved in making millions from China's huge trade in human body parts.

Inside each 'death van' there is a dedicated team of doctors to 'harvest' the organs of the deceased. The injections leave the body intact and in pristine condition for such lucrative work.

After checking that the victim is dead, the medical team first remove the eyes. Then, wearing surgical gowns and masks, they remove the kidney, liver, pancreas and lungs.

Little goes to waste, though the heart cannot be used, having been poisoned by the drugs.

The organs are dispatched in ice boxes to hospitals in the sprawling cities of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, which have developed another specialist trade: selling the harvested organs.

At clinics all over China, these organs are transplanted into the ailing bodies of the wealthy - and thousands more who come as 'organ tourists' from neighbouring countries such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.

Chinese hospitals perform up to 20,000 organ transplants each year. A kidney transplant in China costs £5,000, but can rise to £30,000 if the patient is willing to pay more to obtain an organ quickly.

With more than 10,000 kidney transplants carried out each year, fewer than 300 come from voluntary donations. The British Transplantation Society and Amnesty International have condemned China for harvesting prisoners' organs.

Laws introduced in 2006 make it an offence to remove the organs of people against their will, and banned those under 18 from selling their organs.

But, tellingly, the law does not cover prisoners.

'Organs can be extracted in a speedier and more effective way using these vans than if the prisoner is shot,' says Amnesty International.

'We have gathered strong evidence suggesting the involvement of Chinese police, courts and hospitals in the organ trade.'

The bodies cannot be examined. Corpses are driven to a crematorium and burned before independent witnesses can view them.

A police official, who operates a 'multi-functional and nationwide, first-class, fixed execution ground' where prisoners are shot, confirmed to the Mail that it is always a race against time to save the organs of the executed - and that mobile death vans are better equipped for the job.

'The liver loses its function only five minutes after the human cardiac arrest,' the officer told our researcher.

'The kidney will become dysfunctional 30 minutes after cardiac arrest. So the removal of organs must be completed at the execution ground within 15 minutes, then put in an ice box or preservation solution.'

While other countries worry about the morality of the death penalty, China has no such qualms.

For the Beijing regime, it is not a question of whether they should execute offenders, but how to do it most efficiently - and make the most money from it.
 
Last edited:
at-least they aren't eating tigers genitals for manhood problems like china

on topic amnesty has routinely reported this

C7DIt45VoAAUxiA.jpg
As to see the crime ratio in above countries these executions are very little... More crimes are being monitored but the people are hanged in limited number. It means courts should accelerate in giving quick decisions. China is on top where the more culprits have been hanged, it is the reason the crime rate has decreased there.. Even in USA the execution average is low but the crimes are monitored more. I am basically in favor that one who commits the crime he be treated with equal punishment what he has done the crime if he kills a person he also be hanged in its revenge. Because i want to see the peaceful world and a world free from all crimes.
 
Simple...there is a demand for it. But not the demand you think it is.
China's tansplant operations hit over 10,000 in 2008. However there was no organ donation system. That means all those transplants came for prisoners....10,000. Ans as China's people become richer they will be more able to pay for transplant...and the execution number will go up and up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...minals-executed-organs-sold-black-market.html

China's hi-tech 'death van' where criminals are executed and then their organs are sold on black market

March 2009: Death will come soon for Jiang Yong. A corrupt local planning official with a taste for the high life, Yong solicited money from businessmen eager to expand in China's economic boom.

Showering gifts on his mistress, known as Madam Tang, the unmarried official took more than £1 million in bribes from entrepreneurs wanting permission to build skyscrapers on land which had previously been protected from development.

But Yong, a portly, bespectacled figure, was caught by the Chinese authorities during a purge on corrupt local officials last year.

He confessed and was sentenced to death. China executed 1,715 people last year, so one more death would hardly be remarkable.

article-0-04220B97000005DC-153_468x363.jpg

Disguised: The execution vehicle looks like a normal police van

But there will be nothing ordinary about Yong's death by lethal injection. Unless he wins an appeal, he will draw his final breath strapped inside a vehicle that has been specially developed to make executions more cost-effective and efficient.

In chilling echoes of the 'gas-wagon' project pioneered by the Nazis to slaughter criminals, the mentally ill and Jews, this former member of the China People's Party will be handcuffed to a so-called 'humane' bed and executed inside a gleaming new, hi-tech, mobile 'death van.'

After trials of the mobile execution service were launched quietly three years ago - then hushed up to prevent an international row about the abuse of human rights before the Olympics last summer - these vehicles are now being deployed across China.

The number of executions is expected to rise to a staggering 10,000 people this year (not an impossible figure given that at least 68 crimes - including tax evasion and fraud - are punishable by death in China).

Developed by Jinguan Auto, which also makes bullet-proof limousines for the new rich in this vast country of 1.3 billion people, the vans appear unremarkable.

They cost £60,000, can reach top speeds of 80mph and look like a police vehicle on patrol. Inside, however, the 'death vans' look more like operating theatres.

Executions are monitored by video to ensure they comply with strict rules, making it possible to describe precisely how Jiang Yong will die. After being sedated at the local prison, he will be loaded into the van and strapped to an electric-powered stretcher.

This then glides automatically towards the centre of the van, where doctors will administer three drugs: sodium thiopental to cause unconsciousness; pancuronium bromide to stop breathing and, finally, potassium chloride to stop the heart.

Death is reputed to be quick and painless - not that there is anyone to testify to this. The idea for such a 'modern' scheme is rooted in one of the darkest episodes in human history.

The Nazis used adapted vans as mobile gas chambers from 1940 until the end of World War II. In order to make the best use of time spent transporting criminals and Jewish prisoners, Hitler's scientists developed the vehicles with a hermetically sealed cabin that was filled with carbon monoxide carried by a tube from the exhaust pipes.

The vans were first tested on child patients in a Polish psychiatric hospital in 1940. The Nazis then developed bigger models to carry up to 50 prisoners. They looked like furniture removal vans. Those to be killed were ordered to hand over their valuables, then stripped and locked inside.

As gas was pumped into the container and the van headed towards graves being dug by other prisoners, the muffled cries of those inside could be heard, along with banging on the side.

With the 'cargo' dead, all that remained was for gold fillings to be hacked from the victims' mouths, before the bodies were tipped into the graves.

Now, six decades later, just like the Nazis, China insists these death vans are 'progress'.

The vans save money on building execution facilities in prisons or courts. And they mean that prisoners can be executed locally, closer to communities where they broke the law.

article-1165416-042246A3000005DC-822_468x319.jpg

The Nazi gas van: It killed up to 50 prisoners at a time

'This deters others from committing crime and has more impact,' said one official.

Indeed, a spokesman for the makers of the 'death vans' openly touted for trade this week, saying they are the perfect way to 'efficiently and cleanly' dispatch convicts with lethal injections. Reporting steady sales throughout China, a spokesman for Jinguan Auto - which is situated in a green valley an hour's drive from Chongqing in south-western China - said the firm was bucking the economic trend and had sold ten more vans recently.

The exact number in operation is a state secret. But it is known that Yunnan province alone has 18 mobile units, while dozens of others are patrolling in five other sprawling provinces. Each van is the size of a specially refitted 17-seater minibus.

'We have not sold our execution cars to foreign countries yet,' beamed a proud spokesman. But if they need one, they could contact our company directly.'

Officials say the vehicles are a 'civilised alternative' to the traditional single shot to the head (used in 60 per cent of Chinese executions), ending the life of the condemned quickly, clinically and safely - proving that China 'promotes human rights now,' says Kang Zhongwen, designer of the 'death van'.

It seems a perverse claim, but certainly the shootings can be gruesome. Once carried out in public parks, these executions -sometimes done in groups - have seen countless cases of prisoners failing to die instantly and writhing in agony on the ground before being finished off.

There are other concerns: soldiers carrying out the shooting complain that they are splashed with Aids-contaminated blood. After the shooting, relatives are often presented with the bullet hacked from the condemned's body - and forced to pay the price of the ammunition.

While posing as a modernising force in public, Chinese leaders remain brutal within their own borders. They are, however, anxious to be seen to be moving away from violence against their own people, stressing that all judicial decisions have been taken out of the hands of vengeful local officials and must be ruled on from Beijing.

China has traditionally always taken a ruthless, unemotional view of crime and punishment. Before injections and bullets, the most chilling sentence was death by Ling Chi - death by a thousand cuts - which was abolished only in 1905.

The condemned man was strapped to a table and then, in what was also known as 'slow slicing', his eyes were gouged out.

This was designed to heighten the terror of not being able to see what part of his body would suffer next. Using a sharp knife, the executioner sliced at the condemned's body - chopping off the ears, fingers, nose and toes, before starting to cut off whole limbs.

Traditionalists insisted that exactly 3,600 slices were made. The new mobile execution vans may, indeed, be more humane than this, but their main advantage in official eyes is financial.

According to undercover investigations by human rights' groups, the police, judiciary and doctors are all involved in making millions from China's huge trade in human body parts.

Inside each 'death van' there is a dedicated team of doctors to 'harvest' the organs of the deceased. The injections leave the body intact and in pristine condition for such lucrative work.

After checking that the victim is dead, the medical team first remove the eyes. Then, wearing surgical gowns and masks, they remove the kidney, liver, pancreas and lungs.

Little goes to waste, though the heart cannot be used, having been poisoned by the drugs.

The organs are dispatched in ice boxes to hospitals in the sprawling cities of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, which have developed another specialist trade: selling the harvested organs.

At clinics all over China, these organs are transplanted into the ailing bodies of the wealthy - and thousands more who come as 'organ tourists' from neighbouring countries such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.

Chinese hospitals perform up to 20,000 organ transplants each year. A kidney transplant in China costs £5,000, but can rise to £30,000 if the patient is willing to pay more to obtain an organ quickly.

With more than 10,000 kidney transplants carried out each year, fewer than 300 come from voluntary donations. The British Transplantation Society and Amnesty International have condemned China for harvesting prisoners' organs.

Laws introduced in 2006 make it an offence to remove the organs of people against their will, and banned those under 18 from selling their organs.

But, tellingly, the law does not cover prisoners.

'Organs can be extracted in a speedier and more effective way using these vans than if the prisoner is shot,' says Amnesty International.

'We have gathered strong evidence suggesting the involvement of Chinese police, courts and hospitals in the organ trade.'

The bodies cannot be examined. Corpses are driven to a crematorium and burned before independent witnesses can view them.

A police official, who operates a 'multi-functional and nationwide, first-class, fixed execution ground' where prisoners are shot, confirmed to the Mail that it is always a race against time to save the organs of the executed - and that mobile death vans are better equipped for the job.

'The liver loses its function only five minutes after the human cardiac arrest,' the officer told our researcher.

'The kidney will become dysfunctional 30 minutes after cardiac arrest. So the removal of organs must be completed at the execution ground within 15 minutes, then put in an ice box or preservation solution.'

While other countries worry about the morality of the death penalty, China has no such qualms.

For the Beijing regime, it is not a question of whether they should execute offenders, but how to do it most efficiently - and make the most money from it.

This is indeed a nightmare. Existentialism taken to its logical conclusion. Alexandr Solzhenitsyn is needed to describe this situation.
 
China refutes rumors of organ harvesting
By Li Ruohan Source:Global Times Published: 2016/10/18 0:13:39

All transplants after 2015 from voluntary donors: official
Chinese health officials on Monday vowed to fight corruption in the organ donation system, pledging zero tolerance toward non-voluntary organ transplants and denying that organ harvesting continues from executed prisoners.

On Monday, organ transplant experts from the WHO, International Society for Organ Donation and Procurement (ISODP) and The Transplantation Society (TTS) gathered in Beijing to attend the 2016 China International Organ Donation Conference, the first such international meeting held on the Chinese mainland.

"All the organs transplanted after 2015 are from voluntary donors and we have a zero tolerance toward violations," Huang Jiefu, a former Chinese vice-minister of health and current head of the National Human Organ Donation and Transplant Committee, said at a press conference.

Huang blasted allegations that the number of organ transplants far surpassed the amount of organs donated as lacking evidence, saying that China performed around 8 percent of the world's organ transplant surgeries, and also consumed 8 percent of world's post-operative medications, which are all produced by foreign companies and are traceable.

China banned the use of executed prisoners' organs in January 2015, making voluntary donations the only legitimate channel.

However, the rumor that China is still using organs from dead prisoners and harvesting from living people has not died down.

CNN reported in June that China was still engaged in harvesting organs from prisoners, and that people were even being murdered for their organs, citing a report.

The law and regulations cannot stop all the violations and corruption, such as trading in organs, but the Chinese government has shown great resolution to fight against corruption in organ donation and will not tolerate violations, Huang said.

The rumors only make us stronger and more dedicated to making the system more open, fair, transparent and trustworthy, Huang said.

The Chinese government's resolve to reform the organ transplant industry was highly praised by many organ transplant experts, including Kimberly Young, former president of the ISODP, who said after the conference that she was highly impressed by the huge change.

"None of us would be here today if we did not trust that everything is continuing to be done to support this transparent and ethical process," Young told the Global Times.

"When we first received training [as a surgeon], we were encouraged not to interact with China because there were concerns about unethical practices going on, but what I have seen over the last 10 years is gradual engagement between the transplantation society and those leaders within China who are interested in changes," said Nancy L. Ascher, president of The Transplantation Society, at the conference.

Innovative procedures

The Chinese government puts great attention on the country's organ donation and transplant procedures, which directly concerns the lives of patients and also justice in society, Chinese Vice Premier Liu Yandong said in a speech delivered at the conference.

China processed 2,950 organ donations in the first nine months of this year, with a 50 percent increase year-on-year, the Xinhua News Agency quoted figures released by the National Health and Family Planning Commission as saying on Sunday.

At present, the annual average number of organ donations in China ranks first in Asia and third in the world, the Xinhua News Agency reported.

WHO director general Margaret Chan on Monday praised China's "green channel" for organ transport, which sufficiently reduced delivery times for organs, as an innovative move from the country's health, police and transport system.

In May, a 31-year-old patient at a hospital in Wuhan, Central China's Hubei Province, received a donated heart within three hours, half the time before the green channel went into operation.

The Chinese government started to pilot changes to the organ donation system in 2010, and criminalized the unauthorized trading of organs in 2011. In severe cases of violation, the death penalty could apply.

Moreover, a new system for organ management and distribution was launched in 2013 to better regulate donations.

Since 2007, China has apprehended 32 intermediaries involved in the organ trade, arrested 158 criminal suspects, investigated 17 medical institutions and closed 13 underground operation theaters.
 
China refutes rumors of organ harvesting
By Li Ruohan Source:Global Times Published: 2016/10/18 0:13:39

All transplants after 2015 from voluntary donors: official
Chinese health officials on Monday vowed to fight corruption in the organ donation system, pledging zero tolerance toward non-voluntary organ transplants and denying that organ harvesting continues from executed prisoners.

On Monday, organ transplant experts from the WHO, International Society for Organ Donation and Procurement (ISODP) and The Transplantation Society (TTS) gathered in Beijing to attend the 2016 China International Organ Donation Conference, the first such international meeting held on the Chinese mainland.

"All the organs transplanted after 2015 are from voluntary donors and we have a zero tolerance toward violations," Huang Jiefu, a former Chinese vice-minister of health and current head of the National Human Organ Donation and Transplant Committee, said at a press conference.

Huang blasted allegations that the number of organ transplants far surpassed the amount of organs donated as lacking evidence, saying that China performed around 8 percent of the world's organ transplant surgeries, and also consumed 8 percent of world's post-operative medications, which are all produced by foreign companies and are traceable.

China banned the use of executed prisoners' organs in January 2015, making voluntary donations the only legitimate channel.

However, the rumor that China is still using organs from dead prisoners and harvesting from living people has not died down.

CNN reported in June that China was still engaged in harvesting organs from prisoners, and that people were even being murdered for their organs, citing a report.

The law and regulations cannot stop all the violations and corruption, such as trading in organs, but the Chinese government has shown great resolution to fight against corruption in organ donation and will not tolerate violations, Huang said.

The rumors only make us stronger and more dedicated to making the system more open, fair, transparent and trustworthy, Huang said.

The Chinese government's resolve to reform the organ transplant industry was highly praised by many organ transplant experts, including Kimberly Young, former president of the ISODP, who said after the conference that she was highly impressed by the huge change.

"None of us would be here today if we did not trust that everything is continuing to be done to support this transparent and ethical process," Young told the Global Times.

"When we first received training [as a surgeon], we were encouraged not to interact with China because there were concerns about unethical practices going on, but what I have seen over the last 10 years is gradual engagement between the transplantation society and those leaders within China who are interested in changes," said Nancy L. Ascher, president of The Transplantation Society, at the conference.

Innovative procedures

The Chinese government puts great attention on the country's organ donation and transplant procedures, which directly concerns the lives of patients and also justice in society, Chinese Vice Premier Liu Yandong said in a speech delivered at the conference.

China processed 2,950 organ donations in the first nine months of this year, with a 50 percent increase year-on-year, the Xinhua News Agency quoted figures released by the National Health and Family Planning Commission as saying on Sunday.

At present, the annual average number of organ donations in China ranks first in Asia and third in the world, the Xinhua News Agency reported.

WHO director general Margaret Chan on Monday praised China's "green channel" for organ transport, which sufficiently reduced delivery times for organs, as an innovative move from the country's health, police and transport system.

In May, a 31-year-old patient at a hospital in Wuhan, Central China's Hubei Province, received a donated heart within three hours, half the time before the green channel went into operation.

The Chinese government started to pilot changes to the organ donation system in 2010, and criminalized the unauthorized trading of organs in 2011. In severe cases of violation, the death penalty could apply.

Moreover, a new system for organ management and distribution was launched in 2013 to better regulate donations.

Since 2007, China has apprehended 32 intermediaries involved in the organ trade, arrested 158 criminal suspects, investigated 17 medical institutions and closed 13 underground operation theaters.

According to this article from 3/8/2017
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2017-03/08/content_28472130.htm

"Nearly 220,000 people have registered themselves as organ donors in China, and the number is expected to increase rapidly with the help of internet technologies, according to the China Organ Donation Administrative Center.

The number of people who have registered to become volunteers for organ donation in China reached 219,365 on Monday, up from 66,000 on March 20, Hou Fengzhong, deputy director of the center, said on Tuesday."


That means for the entire country before March 20th, 2017 only 66,000 people were on the organ donation list.

Making the assumption that the majority of organ donors are not dropping dead like flies in China how is China performing tens of thousand of organ transplants a year when their entire donor source was only 66,000 people? Don't you think something isn't logical. Even 220,000 is low to have an adequate supply.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...executed-prisoners-organs-transplants-vatican

China may still be using executed prisoners' organs, official admits

February 2017. Huang Jiefu, in charge of overhauling the Chinese transplant network, angers rights activists as Vatican trafficking talks begin.

An official in charge of overhauling China’s organ transplant programme has said the country may still be using organs from executed prisoners in some cases, even though there is technically zero tolerance for the practice.

The admission by Huang Jiefu, a former Chinese deputy health minister, came as human rights activists and medical ethics experts voiced strong objections to his inclusion at a Vatican summit designed to tackle illicit organ trafficking.

The activists said that by giving Huang a platform, the Vatican risked giving China’s practices an air of legitimacy. Huang told reporters on Tuesday that the controversy was “ridiculous” and repeated assertions that the use of organs from prisoners is now “not allowed”.

“There is zero tolerance. However, China is a big country with a 1.3 billion population so I am sure, definitely, there is some violation of the law,” he told reporters at a conference in Rome.

Pope Francis has called illicit organ trafficking a form of modern slavery. At the start of the conference on Tuesday participants painted a bleak picture of the scale of the problem, with patients who are desperate for life-saving procedures flocking to countries like Egypt, India, and Mexico to buy organs cheaply.

Huang, who has long been a controversial figure in the world of transplantation, said trafficking could be stemmed through the creation of a global taskforce headed by the World Health Organisation.

But experts have questioned Huang’s assessment of the situation, saying China probably still systematically uses the organs of executed prisoners in order to meet an overwhelming demand.

Last year, China’s alleged use of prisoners’ organs was debated at an international conference after two doctors said it was premature to declare China an ethical partner in the international transplant community.

Nicholas Bequelin, the east Asia director for Amnesty International, said it was known at the time that the vast majority of organ transplants in China came from executed prisoners.

The number of prisoners China executes annually is a state secret, but Bequelin said estimates ranged from 3,000 to 7,000. He said experts had cast doubt on Huang’s claims that China had outlawed the practice. “They haven’t stopped the practice and won’t stop. They have a need for organ transplants that far outpace the availability of organs,” Bequelin said.

Details of the process are grim. Bequelin said China did not adhere to World Health Organization recommendations on how doctors should determine whether a person is legally dead. In some cases, organs have been removed before the prisoner would be considered medically dead by international standards.

“The timing of the execution is – we think – sometimes dependent on the need of a particular transplant surgery. You will execute this person at this time on this day, because that is when the patient has to be ready,” Bequelin said. “It is very secret and there is not a lot of reliable information.”

The Vatican has released new bioethics rules that say organ transplantation must involve the free consent of living donors or their representatives and that in ascertaining the death of a donor, it must be diagnosed with certainty, especially when a child is involved.
 
Last edited:
According to this article from 3/8/2017
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2017-03/08/content_28472130.htm

"Nearly 220,000 people have registered themselves as organ donors in China, and the number is expected to increase rapidly with the help of internet technologies, according to the China Organ Donation Administrative Center.

The number of people who have registered to become volunteers for organ donation in China reached 219,365 on Monday, up from 66,000 on March 20, Hou Fengzhong, deputy director of the center, said on Tuesday."


That means for the entire country before March 20th, 2017 only 66,000 people were on the organ donation list.

Making the assumption that the majority of organ donors are not dropping dead like flies in China how is China performing tens of thousand of organ transplants a year when their entire donor source was only 66,000 people? Don't you think something isn't logical. Even 220,000 is low to have an adequate supply.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...executed-prisoners-organs-transplants-vatican

China may still be using executed prisoners' organs, official admits

February 2017. Huang Jiefu, in charge of overhauling the Chinese transplant network, angers rights activists as Vatican trafficking talks begin.

An official in charge of overhauling China’s organ transplant programme has said the country may still be using organs from executed prisoners in some cases, even though there is technically zero tolerance for the practice.

The admission by Huang Jiefu, a former Chinese deputy health minister, came as human rights activists and medical ethics experts voiced strong objections to his inclusion at a Vatican summit designed to tackle illicit organ trafficking.

The activists said that by giving Huang a platform, the Vatican risked giving China’s practices an air of legitimacy. Huang told reporters on Tuesday that the controversy was “ridiculous” and repeated assertions that the use of organs from prisoners is now “not allowed”.

“There is zero tolerance. However, China is a big country with a 1.3 billion population so I am sure, definitely, there is some violation of the law,” he told reporters at a conference in Rome.

Pope Francis has called illicit organ trafficking a form of modern slavery. At the start of the conference on Tuesday participants painted a bleak picture of the scale of the problem, with patients who are desperate for life-saving procedures flocking to countries like Egypt, India, and Mexico to buy organs cheaply.

Huang, who has long been a controversial figure in the world of transplantation, said trafficking could be stemmed through the creation of a global taskforce headed by the World Health Organisation.

But experts have questioned Huang’s assessment of the situation, saying China probably still systematically uses the organs of executed prisoners in order to meet an overwhelming demand.

Last year, China’s alleged use of prisoners’ organs was debated at an international conference after two doctors said it was premature to declare China an ethical partner in the international transplant community.

Nicholas Bequelin, the east Asia director for Amnesty International, said it was known at the time that the vast majority of organ transplants in China came from executed prisoners.

The number of prisoners China executes annually is a state secret, but Bequelin said estimates ranged from 3,000 to 7,000. He said experts had cast doubt on Huang’s claims that China had outlawed the practice. “They haven’t stopped the practice and won’t stop. They have a need for organ transplants that far outpace the availability of organs,” Bequelin said.

Details of the process are grim. Bequelin said China did not adhere to World Health Organization recommendations on how doctors should determine whether a person is legally dead. In some cases, organs have been removed before the prisoner would be considered medically dead by international standards.

“The timing of the execution is – we think – sometimes dependent on the need of a particular transplant surgery. You will execute this person at this time on this day, because that is when the patient has to be ready,” Bequelin said. “It is very secret and there is not a lot of reliable information.”

The Vatican has released new bioethics rules that say organ transplantation must involve the free consent of living donors or their representatives and that in ascertaining the death of a donor, it must be diagnosed with certainty, especially when a child is involved.
Huang blasted allegations that the number of organ transplants far surpassed the amount of organs donated as lacking evidence, saying that China performed around 8 percent of the world's organ transplant surgeries, and also consumed 8 percent of world's post-operative medications, which are all produced by foreign companies and are traceable.
 
china and Pakistan has a lot to lean about human rights , i'm however surprised to see India isn't even in the top 20 , being the the 2nd most populous nation they aren't even in the top 10

There is a strange assumption that lower executions are better. Greater justice is better. It is right and proper that those who are fairly judged and deserve the death sentence actually receive it.

Again people accept the western agenda without question.
 
Simple...there is a demand for it. But not the demand you think it is.
China's tansplant operations hit over 10,000 in 2008. However there was no organ donation system. That means all those transplants came for prisoners....10,000 (and remember many "donors" don't match so the number is actually far higher). As China's people become richer they will be more able to pay for transplants...and the execution number will go up and up and up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...minals-executed-organs-sold-black-market.html

China's hi-tech 'death van' where criminals are executed and then their organs are sold on black market

March 2009: Death will come soon for Jiang Yong. A corrupt local planning official with a taste for the high life, Yong solicited money from businessmen eager to expand in China's economic boom.

Showering gifts on his mistress, known as Madam Tang, the unmarried official took more than £1 million in bribes from entrepreneurs wanting permission to build skyscrapers on land which had previously been protected from development.

But Yong, a portly, bespectacled figure, was caught by the Chinese authorities during a purge on corrupt local officials last year.

He confessed and was sentenced to death. China executed 1,715 people last year, so one more death would hardly be remarkable.

article-0-04220B97000005DC-153_468x363.jpg

Disguised: The execution vehicle looks like a normal police van

But there will be nothing ordinary about Yong's death by lethal injection. Unless he wins an appeal, he will draw his final breath strapped inside a vehicle that has been specially developed to make executions more cost-effective and efficient.

In chilling echoes of the 'gas-wagon' project pioneered by the Nazis to slaughter criminals, the mentally ill and Jews, this former member of the China People's Party will be handcuffed to a so-called 'humane' bed and executed inside a gleaming new, hi-tech, mobile 'death van.'

After trials of the mobile execution service were launched quietly three years ago - then hushed up to prevent an international row about the abuse of human rights before the Olympics last summer - these vehicles are now being deployed across China.

The number of executions is expected to rise to a staggering 10,000 people this year (not an impossible figure given that at least 68 crimes - including tax evasion and fraud - are punishable by death in China).

Developed by Jinguan Auto, which also makes bullet-proof limousines for the new rich in this vast country of 1.3 billion people, the vans appear unremarkable.

They cost £60,000, can reach top speeds of 80mph and look like a police vehicle on patrol. Inside, however, the 'death vans' look more like operating theatres.

Executions are monitored by video to ensure they comply with strict rules, making it possible to describe precisely how Jiang Yong will die. After being sedated at the local prison, he will be loaded into the van and strapped to an electric-powered stretcher.

This then glides automatically towards the centre of the van, where doctors will administer three drugs: sodium thiopental to cause unconsciousness; pancuronium bromide to stop breathing and, finally, potassium chloride to stop the heart.

Death is reputed to be quick and painless - not that there is anyone to testify to this. The idea for such a 'modern' scheme is rooted in one of the darkest episodes in human history.

The Nazis used adapted vans as mobile gas chambers from 1940 until the end of World War II. In order to make the best use of time spent transporting criminals and Jewish prisoners, Hitler's scientists developed the vehicles with a hermetically sealed cabin that was filled with carbon monoxide carried by a tube from the exhaust pipes.

The vans were first tested on child patients in a Polish psychiatric hospital in 1940. The Nazis then developed bigger models to carry up to 50 prisoners. They looked like furniture removal vans. Those to be killed were ordered to hand over their valuables, then stripped and locked inside.

As gas was pumped into the container and the van headed towards graves being dug by other prisoners, the muffled cries of those inside could be heard, along with banging on the side.

With the 'cargo' dead, all that remained was for gold fillings to be hacked from the victims' mouths, before the bodies were tipped into the graves.

Now, six decades later, just like the Nazis, China insists these death vans are 'progress'.

The vans save money on building execution facilities in prisons or courts. And they mean that prisoners can be executed locally, closer to communities where they broke the law.

article-1165416-042246A3000005DC-822_468x319.jpg

The Nazi gas van: It killed up to 50 prisoners at a time

'This deters others from committing crime and has more impact,' said one official.

Indeed, a spokesman for the makers of the 'death vans' openly touted for trade this week, saying they are the perfect way to 'efficiently and cleanly' dispatch convicts with lethal injections. Reporting steady sales throughout China, a spokesman for Jinguan Auto - which is situated in a green valley an hour's drive from Chongqing in south-western China - said the firm was bucking the economic trend and had sold ten more vans recently.

The exact number in operation is a state secret. But it is known that Yunnan province alone has 18 mobile units, while dozens of others are patrolling in five other sprawling provinces. Each van is the size of a specially refitted 17-seater minibus.

'We have not sold our execution cars to foreign countries yet,' beamed a proud spokesman. But if they need one, they could contact our company directly.'

Officials say the vehicles are a 'civilised alternative' to the traditional single shot to the head (used in 60 per cent of Chinese executions), ending the life of the condemned quickly, clinically and safely - proving that China 'promotes human rights now,' says Kang Zhongwen, designer of the 'death van'.

It seems a perverse claim, but certainly the shootings can be gruesome. Once carried out in public parks, these executions -sometimes done in groups - have seen countless cases of prisoners failing to die instantly and writhing in agony on the ground before being finished off.

There are other concerns: soldiers carrying out the shooting complain that they are splashed with Aids-contaminated blood. After the shooting, relatives are often presented with the bullet hacked from the condemned's body - and forced to pay the price of the ammunition.

While posing as a modernising force in public, Chinese leaders remain brutal within their own borders. They are, however, anxious to be seen to be moving away from violence against their own people, stressing that all judicial decisions have been taken out of the hands of vengeful local officials and must be ruled on from Beijing.

China has traditionally always taken a ruthless, unemotional view of crime and punishment. Before injections and bullets, the most chilling sentence was death by Ling Chi - death by a thousand cuts - which was abolished only in 1905.

The condemned man was strapped to a table and then, in what was also known as 'slow slicing', his eyes were gouged out.

This was designed to heighten the terror of not being able to see what part of his body would suffer next. Using a sharp knife, the executioner sliced at the condemned's body - chopping off the ears, fingers, nose and toes, before starting to cut off whole limbs.

Traditionalists insisted that exactly 3,600 slices were made. The new mobile execution vans may, indeed, be more humane than this, but their main advantage in official eyes is financial.

According to undercover investigations by human rights' groups, the police, judiciary and doctors are all involved in making millions from China's huge trade in human body parts.

Inside each 'death van' there is a dedicated team of doctors to 'harvest' the organs of the deceased. The injections leave the body intact and in pristine condition for such lucrative work.

After checking that the victim is dead, the medical team first remove the eyes. Then, wearing surgical gowns and masks, they remove the kidney, liver, pancreas and lungs.

Little goes to waste, though the heart cannot be used, having been poisoned by the drugs.

The organs are dispatched in ice boxes to hospitals in the sprawling cities of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, which have developed another specialist trade: selling the harvested organs.

At clinics all over China, these organs are transplanted into the ailing bodies of the wealthy - and thousands more who come as 'organ tourists' from neighbouring countries such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan.

Chinese hospitals perform up to 20,000 organ transplants each year. A kidney transplant in China costs £5,000, but can rise to £30,000 if the patient is willing to pay more to obtain an organ quickly.

With more than 10,000 kidney transplants carried out each year, fewer than 300 come from voluntary donations. The British Transplantation Society and Amnesty International have condemned China for harvesting prisoners' organs.

Laws introduced in 2006 make it an offence to remove the organs of people against their will, and banned those under 18 from selling their organs.

But, tellingly, the law does not cover prisoners.

'Organs can be extracted in a speedier and more effective way using these vans than if the prisoner is shot,' says Amnesty International.

'We have gathered strong evidence suggesting the involvement of Chinese police, courts and hospitals in the organ trade.'

The bodies cannot be examined. Corpses are driven to a crematorium and burned before independent witnesses can view them.

A police official, who operates a 'multi-functional and nationwide, first-class, fixed execution ground' where prisoners are shot, confirmed to the Mail that it is always a race against time to save the organs of the executed - and that mobile death vans are better equipped for the job.

'The liver loses its function only five minutes after the human cardiac arrest,' the officer told our researcher.

'The kidney will become dysfunctional 30 minutes after cardiac arrest. So the removal of organs must be completed at the execution ground within 15 minutes, then put in an ice box or preservation solution.'

While other countries worry about the morality of the death penalty, China has no such qualms.

For the Beijing regime, it is not a question of whether they should execute offenders, but how to do it most efficiently - and make the most money from it.

Horror story! Really gruesome!

So Is the problem that not enough people volunteer to donate their organs?
 
Back
Top Bottom