EastWatch : Tell me, can you define Vulgarism? ... By Clothing? ... Public display of affection? .... How would you define it? . If i go by your post, you define it by how the Quran prescribes the moral code of conduct .. Is that correct ?
Maybe have a look at the whole history of mankind. From the time since religion become part of us. Would you say it is sufficient time to have decided on what/which/why religion is best for us?.... Would you say the Scandinavians were smart enough to realize this earlier than us :
Beliefs - Scandinavian Nonbelievers, Which Is Not to Say Atheists - NYTimes.com
None the less, it has always been interesting to hear, what people believe makes a good society : Socio economic's or Religious Faith?
I do not have many words to express what I think. One example of vulgarism could be go topless or bottomless. Our religion says a woman's body can be shown only to her husband. It also says, it would be wiser to put on a cloth sheet to cover both your top when you are in the bed with your wife so that the angels do not shy away from you.
I will say all religions are good for the mankind. So, it is easy to see non-vulgarism in the by gone Hindu society. If there was nothing written in the script, there were certainly some non-written ethics among the believers of Hinduism. But, this is being washed away gradually, specially by the Bombay films.
Once it happens in the Hindu society there is no way back to those days of morality, because the Hindu scripts are silent about how to conduct. Now, this is dangerous for the society. In case of Muslims there are always a tug of war between strict adherence and pure liberalism. This will set the position of certain behaviors in between these two extremes.
Europeans have discarded religion after many ups and downs in their Christian society during the last five centuries. Christianism was too harsh and was also too superstitious. Think of the days of witch huntings.
Christianism has many good teachings. But, otherwise they ask people to believe in unbelievable things. One is the claim of Jesus Christ being the son Of God. This is an absurd claim which even the faithfulls found difficult to accept. Many such things created an atmosphere to averse the religion and many of its teachings.
Europeans thought their new society without a religious binding to be too modern to be understood by the hithen Muslims living in deserts and mountains. Europeans' liberal extremism has reached such a point that it has completely destroyed their family lives.
People, men and women, live together for a few years. In the mean time they keep on searching new partners. They keep on divorcing and marrying four or five times in their life. Their children remain without a father or a mother.
Bangladesh should keep a close watch to the european social phenomenon and avoid the social pot holes that have caused people to fall and suffer. Indians are trying to emulate europe, but countries with Islamic background will certainly resist being sucked into the blackholes with european model, from where no society will ever come out.
For India, there is only one small hope, i.e, India's large Muslim population that may gravitate the Hindu India back to its original form.
