What's new

Half of India’s Population Lives Below The Poverty Line

India raids fund for poor to pay for Commonwealth Games
Hannah Gardner, Foreign Correspondent

Last Updated: July 20. 2010 11:06PM UAE / July 20. 2010 7:06PM GMT

NEW DELHI // Out of control spending on the forthcoming Commonwealth Games has seen tens of millions of dollars siphoned off from funds earmarked for social projects to help India’s Dalits, or untouchables, according to documents obtained by a non-governmental organisation.

The Delhi State Government should have set aside the money to build healthcare facilities and schools for the city’s three million Dalits, who occupy the lowest rungs of the Hindu caste system.

The funds were set aside to end the practice of manual scavenging – clearing human waste from waterless toilets by hand – a job many Dalits still perform.

But over the past four years, authorities spent 7.4 billion rupees (Dh580 million) of those funds on preparations for the October Games, according to government documents obtained by a Delhi-based non-governmental organisation under India’s powerful Right to Information Act.


The money was spent on the construction of two stadiums, beautifying the city, erecting street lighting and repairing major roads, according to the NGO, the Housing and Land Rights Network (HLRN).

It was also used to pay for a cultural show to welcome the Queen’s Baton, the Games’ version of the Olympic torch, to Delhi.

“This is criminal. We demand a full enquiry into who diverted these funds,” Miloon Kothari, the executive director of HLRN, said in an interview yesterday.


“Thousands of low-income families are being deprived of access to civic services and facilities as a result.”

He said the national planning commission, headed by the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, had repeatedly signed off on Delhi government budgets during the period despite the misuse of funds.

“The prime minister himself should explain how these games were paid for,” Mr Kothari said.

The prime minister’s office refused to comment on the allegations and the spokesperson for Sheila Dikshit, Delhi’s chief minister, could not be reached.

“No doubt the Commonwealth Games is an expensive affair, but let me assure you that not a single welfare programme has been compromised,” Ms Dikshit said in an interview this month. The scandal is the latest to attach itself to the Commonwealth Games, which India had hoped would act as a coming-of-age party after two decades of economic growth – just as 2008 Beijing Olympics did for China.

Last September, the slow pace of construction at many of the sporting venues led the head of the Commonwealth Games Federation, Mike Fennell, to warn that the Delhi might fall short of the standard set at past Games, or worse, that it would “fail from an operational perspective”.

This year, a panel set up by an Indian court reported that migrant workers at Games construction sites were living and working in “rock-bottom” conditions with unsafe equipment, without access to proper accommodations or medical facilities, and were paid less than the minimum wage.

The report also noted allegations that 43 workers had died in construction projects, compared with six reported deaths during preparations for the Beijing Olympics.

Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, who heads the Commonwealth, has said she will not be able to attend the Games, the first time she has failed to attend in 44 years.

Several top athletes, such as the Olympic sprinting champion Usain Bolt, citing injuries or clashes with other commitments, have also said they will be absent.

“The stadiums we have built are world class, but it is sad that some of the leading sportspersons are not coming to Delhi,” the sports minister, MS Gill, said at a press conference this week.

“The star athletes pulling out from the Games does not please me or the Organising Committee.”

Another issue is the explosion in the Games’s cost since India bid for them in 2003, causing many to question whether a country that is home to one third of the world’s poor should be hosting such a large-scale sporting event at all. Initially, the government said the cost would be 18.9bn rupees. Today, however, the official figure is 100bn rupees, though independent experts calculate it to be closer 300bn rupees, roughly equal to one third of the amount the Indian government spent on health care last year.



Neither figure includes the cost of Delhi’s new international airport, which opened this month, or the extension of the metro, key elements in the city’s plans to host the event.

Even without them, the Delhi Commonwealth Games are to be the most expensive to date, costing six times more than the last Games, in Melbourne in 2006.

“There is no justification for spending that amount of money when a large part of the population still lack the basics such as food and shelter,” Mr Kothari said.



“We are told it is a matter of national prestige, but if we could show we could end poverty that would be a real source of pride.”

In March, Delhi residents were told they would have to help foot the bill for the Games when taxes on petrol, cooking gas, ghee, fertilisers, wood, cooking utensils, tea, coffee and alcohol all rose sharply.

Last week it emerged that the government had asked large state-run enterprises, including the Indian Cricket Board, to sponsor the Games because there are not enough private sponsors.



Yet, none of this is dampening the rhetoric of the Indian organisers who claim that much like Indian weddings the entire event will pull together at the last minute.

“It will be the best Commonwealth Games ever,” said Suresh Kalmadi, the chairman of the Organising Committee in Delhi.

“We know what we need to do to be ready. These things always happen before such mega events and there is no reason for panic. It is our promise that the Commonwealth Games 2010 will be a success.”

India raids fund for poor to pay for Commonwealth Games - The National Newspaper
 
damn,how many people in ur nation can afford cell phones,how many can afford core 2 duo:rofl:,just visit India and see even poor people also have it,India poor r even richer than pakistani's:rofl:

everyone can afford mobile.... even a peon ....... so thats pointless talking abt mobiles:blink:
 
India raids fund for poor to pay for Commonwealth Games
Hannah Gardner, Foreign Correspondent

Last Updated: July 20. 2010 11:06PM UAE / July 20. 2010 7:06PM GMT

NEW DELHI // Out of control spending on the forthcoming Commonwealth Games has seen tens of millions of dollars siphoned off from funds earmarked for social projects to help India’s Dalits, or untouchables, according to documents obtained by a non-governmental organisation.

The Delhi State Government should have set aside the money to build healthcare facilities and schools for the city’s three million Dalits, who occupy the lowest rungs of the Hindu caste system.

The funds were set aside to end the practice of manual scavenging – clearing human waste from waterless toilets by hand – a job many Dalits still perform.

But over the past four years, authorities spent 7.4 billion rupees (Dh580 million) of those funds on preparations for the October Games, according to government documents obtained by a Delhi-based non-governmental organisation under India’s powerful Right to Information Act.


The money was spent on the construction of two stadiums, beautifying the city, erecting street lighting and repairing major roads, according to the NGO, the Housing and Land Rights Network (HLRN).

It was also used to pay for a cultural show to welcome the Queen’s Baton, the Games’ version of the Olympic torch, to Delhi.

“This is criminal. We demand a full enquiry into who diverted these funds,” Miloon Kothari, the executive director of HLRN, said in an interview yesterday.


“Thousands of low-income families are being deprived of access to civic services and facilities as a result.”



Even without them, the Delhi Commonwealth Games are to be the most expensive to date, costing six times more than the last Games, in Melbourne in 2006.

“There is no justification for spending that amount of money when a large part of the population still lack the basics such as food and shelter,” Mr Kothari said.



“We are told it is a matter of national prestige, but if we could show we could end poverty that would be a real source of pride.”

In March, Delhi residents were told they would have to help foot the bill for the Games when taxes on petrol, cooking gas, ghee, fertilisers, wood, cooking utensils, tea, coffee and alcohol all rose sharply.

Last week it emerged that the government had asked large state-run enterprises, including the Indian Cricket Board, to sponsor the Games because there are not enough private sponsors.



Yet, none of this is dampening the rhetoric of the Indian organisers who claim that much like Indian weddings the entire event will pull together at the last minute.

“It will be the best Commonwealth Games ever,” said Suresh Kalmadi, the chairman of the Organising Committee in Delhi.

“We know what we need to do to be ready. These things always happen before such mega events and there is no reason for panic. It is our promise that the Commonwealth Games 2010 will be a success.”

India raids fund for poor to pay for Commonwealth Games - The National Newspaper

cmon yar ............ why will india give its money to dilats .... dont u know its a secular country !! games are far more important than dilats ....
 
I don't why threads on poverty in India turn into a flame war?

Why can't we ignore some of the 1st world :rofl: comments of members from our neighborhood and discuss about it to educate ourselves thoroughly? :undecided:
 
Rank Country Population below poverty line (%)
1 Zambia 86
2 Chad 80
3 Haiti 80
4 Liberia 80
5 Gaza Strip 80
6 Sierra Leone 70.2
7 Suriname 70
8 Mozambique 70
9 Nigeria 70
10 Swaziland 69
11 Zimbabwe 68
12 Burundi 68
13 Niger 63
14 Comoros 60
15 Bolivia 60
16 Rwanda 60
17 Tajikistan 60
18 Guatemala 56.2
19 Sao Tome and Principe 54
20 Senegal 54
21 Afghanistan 53
22 Malawi 53
23 Honduras 50.7
24 Madagascar 50
25 Kenya 50
26 South Africa 50
27 Eritrea 50
28 Colombia 49.2
29 Lesotho 49
30 Cameroon 48
31 Nicaragua 48
32 Guinea 47
33 Burkina Faso 46.4
34 West Bank 46
35 Yemen 45.2
36 Bangladesh 45
37 Peru 44.5
38 Dominican Republic 42.2
39 Djibouti 42
40 East Timor 42
41 Cote d'Ivoire 42
42 Angola 40.5
43 Kyrgyzstan 40
44 Mauritania 40
45 Sudan 40
46 Ethiopia 38.7
47 Ecuador 38.3
48 Venezuela 37.9
49 Ukraine 37.7
50 Benin 37.4
51 Papua New Guinea 37
52 Mongolia 36.1
53 Mali 36.1
54 Tanzania 36
55 Uganda 35
56 Cambodia 35
57 Namibia 34.9
58 Belize 33.5
59 Uzbekistan 33
60 Burma 32.7
61 Grenada 32
62 Togo 32
63 Paraguay 32
64 Bhutan 31.7
65 Brazil 31
66 Georgia 31
67 Nepal 30.9
68 El Salvador 30.7
69 Laos 30.7
70 Botswana 30.3
71 Dominica 30
72 Turkmenistan 30
73 Cape Verde 30
74 Philippines 30
75 Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of 29.8
76 Moldova 29.5
77 Virgin Islands 28.9
78 Panama 28.6
79 Ghana 28.5
80 Lebanon 28
81 Uruguay 27.4
82 Belarus 27.1
83 Micronesia, Federated States of 26.7
84 Armenia 26.5
85 Fiji 25.5
86 Romania 25
87 Albania 25
88 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25
89 India 25
90 Azerbaijan 24
91 Pakistan 24
92 Tonga 24
93 Argentina 23.4
94 Anguilla 23
95 Algeria 23
96 Guam 23
97 Sri Lanka 22
98 Israel 21.6
99 Maldives 21
100 Slovakia 21
101 Egypt 20
102 Turkey 20
103 Spain 19.8
104 United Arab Emirates 19.5
105 Bermuda 19
106 Chile 18.2
107 Iran 18
108 Portugal 18
109 Indonesia 17.8
110 Poland 17
111 Trinidad and Tobago 17
112 Costa Rica 16
113 Russia 15.8
114 Belgium 15.2
115 Korea, South 15
116 Morocco 15
117 Jamaica 14.8
118 Vietnam 14.8
119 Jordan 14.2
120 Bulgaria 14.1
121 United Kingdom 14
122 Kazakhstan 13.8
123 Mexico 13.8
124 Slovenia 12.9
125 United States 12
126 Syria 11.9
127 Germany 11
128 Croatia 11
129 Canada 10.8
130 Netherlands 10.5
131 Thailand 10
132 Bahamas, The 9.3
133 Hungary 8.6
134 China 8
135 Mauritius 8
136 Libya 7.4
137 Tunisia 7.4
138 Montenegro 7
139 Ireland 7
140 France 6.2
141 Austria 5.9
142 Malaysia 5.1
143 Estonia 5
144 Lithuania 4
145 Taiwan 0.95

Definition: National estimates of the percentage of the population falling below the poverty line are based on surveys of sub-groups, with the results weighted by the number of people in each group. Definitions of poverty vary considerably among nations. For example, rich nations generally employ more generous standards of poverty than poor nations.
 
this article reminds me of french revolution, when king of france refused to fulfil the needs of its people...atlast people stand against the king and hanged him along with his young wife and 3 months old child... In socialogy we can define it as haves and haves not... Haves possess the power and Haves Not don't... when Haves Not become tired of imbalance they rise against Haves and ultimately finsh them off. This much poverty in india shows the same situation. Now we can see 19 freedom movements are running in india... though Pakistan is also not safe with that respect but situation is not that worse..
 
So lets finish it for the sake of Pak and BD members.

India is poor and economically backward than Pak and BD growing at 3.5% per year.
Be HAPPY my fellow Pak and BD friends.
:devil:
 
Rank Country Population below poverty line (%)
1 Zambia 86
2 Chad 80
3 Haiti 80
4 Liberia 80
5 Gaza Strip 80
6 Sierra Leone 70.2
7 Suriname 70
8 Mozambique 70
9 Nigeria 70
10 Swaziland 69
11 Zimbabwe 68
12 Burundi 68
13 Niger 63
14 Comoros 60
15 Bolivia 60
16 Rwanda 60
17 Tajikistan 60
18 Guatemala 56.2
19 Sao Tome and Principe 54
20 Senegal 54
21 Afghanistan 53
22 Malawi 53
23 Honduras 50.7
24 Madagascar 50
25 Kenya 50
26 South Africa 50
27 Eritrea 50
28 Colombia 49.2
29 Lesotho 49
30 Cameroon 48
31 Nicaragua 48
32 Guinea 47
33 Burkina Faso 46.4
34 West Bank 46
35 Yemen 45.2
36 Bangladesh 45
37 Peru 44.5
38 Dominican Republic 42.2
39 Djibouti 42
40 East Timor 42
41 Cote d'Ivoire 42
42 Angola 40.5
43 Kyrgyzstan 40
44 Mauritania 40
45 Sudan 40
46 Ethiopia 38.7
47 Ecuador 38.3
48 Venezuela 37.9
49 Ukraine 37.7
50 Benin 37.4
51 Papua New Guinea 37
52 Mongolia 36.1
53 Mali 36.1
54 Tanzania 36
55 Uganda 35
56 Cambodia 35
57 Namibia 34.9
58 Belize 33.5
59 Uzbekistan 33
60 Burma 32.7
61 Grenada 32
62 Togo 32
63 Paraguay 32
64 Bhutan 31.7
65 Brazil 31
66 Georgia 31
67 Nepal 30.9
68 El Salvador 30.7
69 Laos 30.7
70 Botswana 30.3
71 Dominica 30
72 Turkmenistan 30
73 Cape Verde 30
74 Philippines 30
75 Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of 29.8
76 Moldova 29.5
77 Virgin Islands 28.9
78 Panama 28.6
79 Ghana 28.5
80 Lebanon 28
81 Uruguay 27.4
82 Belarus 27.1
83 Micronesia, Federated States of 26.7
84 Armenia 26.5
85 Fiji 25.5
86 Romania 25
87 Albania 25
88 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25
89 India 25
90 Azerbaijan 24
91 Pakistan 24
92 Tonga 24
93 Argentina 23.4
94 Anguilla 23
95 Algeria 23
96 Guam 23
97 Sri Lanka 22
98 Israel 21.6
99 Maldives 21
100 Slovakia 21
101 Egypt 20
102 Turkey 20
103 Spain 19.8
104 United Arab Emirates 19.5
105 Bermuda 19
106 Chile 18.2
107 Iran 18
108 Portugal 18
109 Indonesia 17.8
110 Poland 17
111 Trinidad and Tobago 17
112 Costa Rica 16
113 Russia 15.8
114 Belgium 15.2
115 Korea, South 15
116 Morocco 15
117 Jamaica 14.8
118 Vietnam 14.8
119 Jordan 14.2
120 Bulgaria 14.1
121 United Kingdom 14
122 Kazakhstan 13.8
123 Mexico 13.8
124 Slovenia 12.9
125 United States 12
126 Syria 11.9
127 Germany 11
128 Croatia 11
129 Canada 10.8
130 Netherlands 10.5
131 Thailand 10
132 Bahamas, The 9.3
133 Hungary 8.6
134 China 8
135 Mauritius 8
136 Libya 7.4
137 Tunisia 7.4
138 Montenegro 7
139 Ireland 7
140 France 6.2
141 Austria 5.9
142 Malaysia 5.1
143 Estonia 5
144 Lithuania 4
145 Taiwan 0.95

Definition: National estimates of the percentage of the population falling below the poverty line are based on surveys of sub-groups, with the results weighted by the number of people in each group. Definitions of poverty vary considerably among nations. For example, rich nations generally employ more generous standards of poverty than poor nations.

dude this is a percentage with respect to population...population in billions when multiplied by 25 pc give much bigger result as compared to the population in million multiplied by 24 pc.
 
China had the exact same problem, only a few decades ago.

Only a few decades of Economic growth will be able to sort out this problem once and for all.

India now has double-digit economic growth, I think it will take less than a decade to achieve parity with China in terms of poverty rate. Pakistan and Bangladesh are also seeing very healthy economic growth.

We in Asia will raise our people out of poverty. This can not be stopped. :cheers:
 
Last edited:
Rank Country Population below poverty line (%)
1 Zambia 86
2 Chad 80
3 Haiti 80
4 Liberia 80
5 Gaza Strip 80
6 Sierra Leone 70.2
7 Suriname 70
8 Mozambique 70
9 Nigeria 70
10 Swaziland 69
11 Zimbabwe 68
12 Burundi 68
13 Niger 63
14 Comoros 60
15 Bolivia 60
16 Rwanda 60
17 Tajikistan 60
18 Guatemala 56.2
19 Sao Tome and Principe 54
20 Senegal 54
21 Afghanistan 53
22 Malawi 53
23 Honduras 50.7
24 Madagascar 50
25 Kenya 50
26 South Africa 50
27 Eritrea 50
28 Colombia 49.2
29 Lesotho 49
30 Cameroon 48
31 Nicaragua 48
32 Guinea 47
33 Burkina Faso 46.4
34 West Bank 46
35 Yemen 45.2
36 Bangladesh 45
37 Peru 44.5
38 Dominican Republic 42.2
39 Djibouti 42
40 East Timor 42
41 Cote d'Ivoire 42
42 Angola 40.5
43 Kyrgyzstan 40
44 Mauritania 40
45 Sudan 40
46 Ethiopia 38.7
47 Ecuador 38.3
48 Venezuela 37.9
49 Ukraine 37.7
50 Benin 37.4
51 Papua New Guinea 37
52 Mongolia 36.1
53 Mali 36.1
54 Tanzania 36
55 Uganda 35
56 Cambodia 35
57 Namibia 34.9
58 Belize 33.5
59 Uzbekistan 33
60 Burma 32.7
61 Grenada 32
62 Togo 32
63 Paraguay 32
64 Bhutan 31.7
65 Brazil 31
66 Georgia 31
67 Nepal 30.9
68 El Salvador 30.7
69 Laos 30.7
70 Botswana 30.3
71 Dominica 30
72 Turkmenistan 30
73 Cape Verde 30
74 Philippines 30
75 Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of 29.8
76 Moldova 29.5
77 Virgin Islands 28.9
78 Panama 28.6
79 Ghana 28.5
80 Lebanon 28
81 Uruguay 27.4
82 Belarus 27.1
83 Micronesia, Federated States of 26.7
84 Armenia 26.5
85 Fiji 25.5
86 Romania 25
87 Albania 25
88 Bosnia and Herzegovina 25
89 India 25
90 Azerbaijan 24
91 Pakistan 24
92 Tonga 24
93 Argentina 23.4
94 Anguilla 23
95 Algeria 23
96 Guam 23
97 Sri Lanka 22
98 Israel 21.6
99 Maldives 21
100 Slovakia 21
101 Egypt 20
102 Turkey 20
103 Spain 19.8
104 United Arab Emirates 19.5
105 Bermuda 19
106 Chile 18.2
107 Iran 18
108 Portugal 18
109 Indonesia 17.8
110 Poland 17
111 Trinidad and Tobago 17
112 Costa Rica 16
113 Russia 15.8
114 Belgium 15.2
115 Korea, South 15
116 Morocco 15
117 Jamaica 14.8
118 Vietnam 14.8
119 Jordan 14.2
120 Bulgaria 14.1
121 United Kingdom 14
122 Kazakhstan 13.8
123 Mexico 13.8
124 Slovenia 12.9
125 United States 12
126 Syria 11.9
127 Germany 11
128 Croatia 11
129 Canada 10.8
130 Netherlands 10.5
131 Thailand 10
132 Bahamas, The 9.3
133 Hungary 8.6
134 China 8
135 Mauritius 8
136 Libya 7.4
137 Tunisia 7.4
138 Montenegro 7
139 Ireland 7
140 France 6.2
141 Austria 5.9
142 Malaysia 5.1
143 Estonia 5
144 Lithuania 4
145 Taiwan 0.95

Definition: National estimates of the percentage of the population falling below the poverty line are based on surveys of sub-groups, with the results weighted by the number of people in each group. Definitions of poverty vary considerably among nations. For example, rich nations generally employ more generous standards of poverty than poor nations.

Wrong!
China has less poor people than USA?!!W!@#$@#%$#@
:cheesy::cheesy:
 
China had the exact same problem, only a few decades ago.

Only a few decades of Economic growth will be able to sort out this problem once and for all.

India is now has double-digit economic growth, I think it will take less than a decade to achieve parity with China in terms of poverty rate. Pakistan and Bangladesh are also seeing very healthy economic growth.

We in Asia will raise our people out of poverty. This can not be stopped. :cheers:
Very decent post,my friend.
But Pakistani is growing at less than 6%!
And BD even low.
So you,can't say,that their economy is going good.
 
China had the exact same problem, only a few decades ago.

Only a few decades of Economic growth will be able to sort out this problem once and for all.

India is now has double-digit economic growth, I think it will take less than a decade to achieve parity with China in terms of poverty rate. Pakistan and Bangladesh are also seeing very healthy economic growth.

We in Asia will raise our people out of poverty. :cheers:

I don't think the bolded part is true ,last time remember the growth rate being 6.5%.

Any significantly large change in poverty in India will be visible by 2025 or 2030,until then Indian and Pakistanis will be at whats going on currently on this thread.:argh:
 
I don't think the bolded part is true ,last time remember the growth rate being 6.5%.

Any significantly large change in poverty in India will be visible by 2025 or 2030,until then Indian and Pakistanis will be at whats going on currently on this thread.:argh:

You're right, my latest copy of The Economist shows 8.6% growth in the first quarter, and it is projected to rise during the year.

I think this year or the next will see double-digit growth, but the main thing is that the rate of economic growth is very healthy.

I believe the next decade will see an enormous number of people raised out of poverty, all across Asia. It is inevitable. :cheers:
 
Back
Top Bottom