It's different missiles with different roles at different cost. India had not choice but a Russian Brahmos, so she is using it for everything. I shall stop here since I have explained this many times why you don't use supersonic missiles to attack static targets. It's just plain stupid. It's like using precision laser to cut fire wood.
Each and every fact from China is always biased and incorrect.
With all due respect, you know deep in your heart this is just another milking scheme by the Russian. Let's put it this way, if there is a missile called CHIMOS and it is a so called 'indigenous' Chinese Russian missile with most of the key subsystems by Russia, do you think the Chinese will be proud of it? They will in their minds be full of anger because of their inability to produce it indigenously. Until a few years ago when domestic engines started being used in J-10s, no Chinese is really fully proud of the J-10.
Well if we still need to import all the key subsystems, then I would agree, but Z-10 is completely manufactured in China now. I had been reiterating the same point over and over again, China beg, borrow, steal, spy, copy, clone, absorb, learn, and innovate. We had been doing it for decades and look at where we are today.
WZ-16 is not fully indigenous yet, we are still cloning it but WZ-9 is albeit with lower power. I am not sure if your 70% figure is accountable, but well you can choose to believe what you like.
Brahmos co-developed? Other than $ what technology can you offer the Russians? LOL. Yup, another Indian claim from an Indian source. Where do I even begin.
LoL,
That's why we call China a BEGGAR, THIEF AND LAW ABIDING NATION.
Your other friend just told me it was 70% indigenous, now you are telling me a different figure. The same way Indians kill 30 Chinese then 300 Chinese and now 340 Chinese in Sikkim? Not sure why you called JF-17 a failed project, we believe it is enough to achieve parity with LCA, that's why we transferred it to Pakistan. You can choose to believe the 2 or 3 inducted LCA as more advanced, I can't stop you. =)
You can call us whatever you want, the fact remains, India is technologically, economically and socially backward compared to China. In a conventional war without US intervention, India will lose the war, not just because of the sheer quantity of armaments or equipment, but because China can sustain a prolonged war.
1st. I said more than 60% and gslv mentioned it as upto 70%, than why you get confused? Go back to school dude.
You're very resistant to avoid your bad habits.
