If it is DRDO then it will be at least 15-20 years before it is functional.
This ain't necessarily true,especially when we are talking about radars.DRDO,or LRDE to be precise,has developed a range of ground based and airborne high and medium powered AESA radars,that have gone into production.The biggest problem is,that there is not even a single semi conductor fab in India,which means the chips for TRMMs can not be produced in India.But that's hardly DRDO's fault.
It was Bofors who won the Kargil war. Even if it is agreed that the range is 38 km for dhanush then there are also other factors like accuracy, rate of fire, mobility, reliability etc.
There is no ifs or buts,the Dhanush is better than the Orginal FH 77B in all parameters including range,automation,target acquisition and engagement - you just name it.
And even if, and I say IF, dhanush is better than an 80s era gun like bofors then how does it stack up against Denel, Pegasus etc.?
Well,apart from range,the Dhanush fairs favourably with contemporary towed artillery systems.But Dhanush was never intended to become a substitute for modern L/52 guns in any way.Rather,it was always meant to be a stop gap,an upgrade for existing FH 77Bs and M 46 field guns,which would them supplement the imported guns and ARDE ATAGS.
And what is its mobility like in comparison to T-90?
The Arjun MkI has greater mobility compared to the T90S,owing to the former's higher power to mass ratio and lower ground pressure per square inch.
What is its power-to-weight ration?
Dude,why are you even asking this question to another,when you could find it out all by yourself??Just divide the engine hp by overall mass of the vehicle.
The gun has a 500 mm penetration at what range? How does it compare with the guns of T-90, Leo 2?
The range is same 2 km as is the norm worldwide,which by the way would be considered average at best and substandard at worst.But then,this round was developed way back in the late 80s and it was very good for that time.But the problem is,the round was never changed with time,due to the uncertainty of the project.It's only recently,the ARDE has started to develop a new long rod multi segmented round,which should be closer to more modern rounds..............lets see how it turns out.
Full auto is not the problem, problem is the weapon jamming when fired in full auto. Google for what double feeding means. Trichy assault rifle has full auto and it jams before the magazine could be emptied. This is the quality of PSU.
Fair enough,but how is that DRDO's fault??They are not the ones,manufacturing the rifles after all.
Funny that the DRDO fan boys defend lack of INSAS auto capability by saying automatic fire is obsolete but at the same time they also say excalibur is superior because it has auto fire option.
I do not know who said that,but that statement isn't right.Full auto mode is not obsolete by any stretch of imagination but it's needed only in some very specific scenarios like CQB. At medium range,the full auto mode is not and should not be used for a multitude of reasons.For example,no one can control the rifles at full auto,and besides,it eats up ammo real fast and all which you already know.
Then there were instances when soldiers had expended all their ammo under stress during Vietnam war,so that's why the triple fire burst mode was invented and specified by the armies,including Indian Army.
And by the way,developing the burst fire mode involves more complex engineering than developing the full auto.
Nothing would be better than naxals being wiped out but the paramilitary is not equipped to face the ak-47 armed naxals.
And who's fault is that??INSAS was strictly developed as per the GSQR issued by the Army,who wanted a rifle design for conventional warfare,to take precise shots at standard battle ranges over open terrain.It was practically never built for COIN ops,just as its predecessor - SLR.