HAL pegs price of Tejas fighter at Rs 162 crore

[Superboy]

yea but , JF-17 don't have any video of firing any missiles , ....

he was referring to missile india is developing BVR which has range for 50-60 KM.

EL/M-2032 Radar has 100+ km range , check the Isreali company website.....

JF-17 has KLJ-7 radar which is equivalent to RC-400. It can fire SD-10 if it goes into battle today. So radar of Tejas is EL/M-2032 or MMR?

PAF members tried to proof hard that JF-17 is superior , and floated many theories, like countries interested in JF-17 etc etc and from last in 6-7 yrs only able to produce 50 planes...... what a laugh.....of a successful plane.

JF-17 is an extremely advanced fighter, being the first in the world to feature DSI. Not to mention this is the first time Pakistan is manufacturing fighter jets. It took Pakistan a while to get the hang of the learning curve needed to manufacture such advanced fighters. It's not bad, considering Su-30MKI production was initially very slow in India and for the same reason. The second batch of 50 JF-17 Block 2 would go much faster, with the first units scheduled for delivery by June.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

Epic fail...

lmao.
\
Yeah check the JF info thread first... ur making yourself look like a fool.
Lmao... :

Tejas Needs to Cross 6 Milestones in 15 Months -The New Indian Express

Yeah and to reach them you need another 40 year to produce.

you can't prove then just say ........ Well first check your LCA knowledge then and your worn JF-17 information which only based on assumption and nothing concrete in proof. ( like successful missile test by PAK Army, world has years later hows successful missile test were and in pdf people declared success also)

Yes agree those points make it comparable to your JF-17 Block-2 , isn't? LCA = JF-17 BL-2

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

you can't prove then just say ........ Well first check your LCA knowledge then and your worn JF-17 information which only based on assumption and nothing concrete in proof. ( like successful missile test by PAK Army, world has years later hows successful missile test were and in pdf people declared success also)

Yes agree those points make it comparable to your JF-17 Block-2 , isn't? LCA = JF-17 BL-2

lmao.. the "wise guy" strikes again..

 

[Superboy]

you can't prove then just say ........ Well first check your LCA knowledge then and your worn JF-17 information which only based on assumption and nothing concrete in proof. ( like successful missile test by PAK Army, world has years later hows successful missile test were and in pdf people declared success also)

Yes agree those points make it comparable to your JF-17 Block-2 , isn't? LCA = JF-17 BL-2

Tejas Mk 1 doesn't even have DSI. JF-17 Block 2 incorporates more advanced avionics like AESA and IRST and wide angle holographic HUD from J-10B, none of which Tejas Mk 1 has.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

JF-17 has KLJ-7 radar which is equivalent to RC-400. It can fire SD-10 if it goes into battle today. So radar of Tejas is EL/M-2032 or MMR?

It is 2032 and AESA is under development.

JF-17 is an extremely advanced fighter, being the first in the world to feature DSI. Not to mention this is the first time Pakistan is manufacturing fighter jets. It took Pakistan a while to get the hang of the learning curve needed to manufacture such advanced fighters. It's not bad, considering Su-30MKI production was initially very slow in India and for the same reason. The second batch of 50 JF-17 Block 2 would go much faster, with the first units scheduled for delivery by June.

Indian already started production by 3rd year , India will be producing 16 units or more.

DSI or Y duct design serve the same purpose , DSI don't make jet do anything special.....

lmao.. the "wise guy" strikes again..

instead , just give me some technical answer ... about your JF-BL2 and LCA FOC ? Mr. Tech guy

Tejas Mk 1 doesn't even have DSI. JF-17 Block 2 incorporates more advanced avionics like AESA and IRST and wide angle holographic HUD from J-10B, none of which Tejas Mk 1 has.

Well , LCA has Y shape and it performance same as your DSI give. BLOCK-2 don't have AESA .

LCA -FOB will have IRST and everything that JF-BL2 have , check technical...

 

[Superboy]

It is 2032 and AESA is under development.

Isn't 2032 too big to fit into Tejas?

DSI or Y duct design serve the same purpose , DSI don't make jet do anything special.....

DSI reduces weight and improves aerodynamics, good for speed. Special or not, JF-17 is the first in the world to feature DSI, and that makes JF-17 a record holder.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

Isn't 2032 too big to fit into Tejas?




DSI reduces weight and improves aerodynamics, good for speed. Special or not, JF-17 is the first in the world to feature DSI, and that makes JF-17 a record holder.

reduces weight?? LCA has max take off weight despite having the same empty weight. both have same speed. lol..... DSI is tested on F-16 but don't find any benefit to it and it scraped.

 

[Superboy]

reduces weight?? LCA has max take off weight despite having the same empty weight. both have same speed. lol..... DSI is tested on F-16 but don't find any benefit to it and it scraped.

DSI not that good then why all new American and Chinese fighters like F-35, J-10B, J-20, J-31, JF-17 have it?

 

[GORKHALI]

Epic fail...



lmao.
\

Yeah check the JF info thread first... ur making yourself look like a fool.


Lmao... :




Tejas Needs to Cross 6 Milestones in 15 Months -The New Indian Express





Yeah and to reach them you need another 40 year to produce.

No doubt a d&%khead always be a d&^khead.

Well, here's the 15 month to-do list for HAL:

1. Expand flight envelope to -3.5 to 8G (Currently -2 to 6G).
2. 24° angle of attack (Currently 22°).Though it already shown 24° still need to be tested again for certification. On the other hand ,JF 17 achieved 26° but total potential of LCA can be increased to 28°.
3. In-flight refueling capability (Integration of Cobham probe completed). So is Jf17
4. Demonstration of Rafael ADS Derby BVR air-to-air missile.so is Jf 17
5. Demonstration of Rafael ADS Python-5 IIR close combat missile . Jf 17 still don't have CCM next gen missile as such
6. Completion of integration & demonstration of KBP Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-23 23mm cannon.Jf 17, Yet to fire up its gun (Correct me)
7. New design drop tanks for supersonic flight.
8. New radome to improve radar and electromagnetic performance.New radome already developed need integration.As of now 40-50 Km range for target 1 - 4 sq/m RCS
9. Validate more efficient cooling system for aircraft braking assembly.
10. Additional weapons testing, including PGMs. More likely Kh-59ME,Kh-59MK active radar homing anti-ship missile,Kh-35U,Kh-31P/A anti-radar missile and S 8 and S 11 rocket pods

so It'll takes 1-2 yr more to finally integrate BVR and IFR that mean Jf 17 yet to receive FOC. Happy trolling

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

It is 2032 and AESA is under development.

Yes with 45-50 km range..

Indian already started production by 3rd year , India will be producing 16 units or more.

Lol.. and to be inducted by?

DSI or Y duct design serve the same purpose , DSI don't make jet do anything special.....

lol.. sure DSI is obsolete tech... stupid americans,Pak n China..

instead , just give me some technical answer ... about your JF-BL2 and LCA FOC ? Mr. Tech guy

Lol... LCA "wins" ..

Well , LCA has Y shape and it performance same as your DSI give. BLOCK-2 don't have AESA .

Nope.. but it has a KLJ7V2 while AESA is under preperations...

P.S: Specs of Block II are not known yet.

LCA -FOB will have IRST and everything that JF-BL2 have , check technical.

Even Block I has IRST but a poded one...

Show us with LCA "prototypes" with IRST.

 

[Jayanta]

Isn't 2032 too big to fit into Tejas?




DSI reduces weight and improves aerodynamics, good for speed. Special or not, JF-17 is the first in the world to feature DSI, and that makes JF-17 a record holder.

Truly JF-17 is an excellent aircraft, it has a lot of potential in fact it is the best fighter and can give fighters like Su-30, Mig-29, F-16, Rafale and Mirage a run for the money....but could you answer me one question. The country that produces it (China) has not inducted a single JF-17 into their air force...Why??

 

[Superboy]

Truly JF-17 is an excellent aircraft, it has a lot of potential in fact it is the best fighter and can give fighters like Su-30, Mig-29, F-16, Rafale and Mirage a run for the money....but could you answer me one question. The country that produces it (China) has not inducted a single JF-17 into their air force...Why??

China does not use light fighters, and neither does America. F-20 was rejected in favor of the medium weight F-16 despite having better performance. Light fighters form the backbone of the air forces of small countries or countries that don't ever fight anyone, for example Sweden, South Africa, Brazil, Thailand.

As a matter of fact, the Chinese designation of JF-17 is FC-1, with FC standing for export fighter.

 

[GORKHALI]

seem

Yes with 45-50 km range..


Lol.. and to be inducted by?


lol.. sure DSI is obsolete tech... stupid americans,Pak n China..



Lol... LCA "wins" ..


Nope.. but it has a KLJ7V2 while AESA is under preperations...

P.S: Specs of Block II are not known yet.



Even Block I has IRST but a poded one...

Show us with LCA "prototypes" with IRST.

China does not use light fighters, and neither does America. F-20 was rejected in favor of the medium weight F-16 despite having better performance. Light fighters form the backbone of the air forces of small countries or countries that don't ever fight anyone, for example Sweden, South Africa, Brazil.

What 600 Nos.of f 7 and J7 etc doing in Chinese inventories?

 

[Jayanta]

China does not use light fighters, and neither does America. F-20 was rejected in favor of the medium weight F-16 despite having better performance. Light fighters form the backbone of the air forces of small countries or countries that don't ever fight anyone, for example Sweden, South Africa, Brazil.

Come on Chinese used Mig-21's for ages, and who told you that F-16 is a medium weight fighter....it is indeed lightweight fighter. The chief reasons why F-16 was selected are lower operating costs; greater range; and maneuver performance that was "significantly better" than that of the F-20, especially at near-supersonic and supersonic speeds.

 

[Superboy]

seem


What 600 Nos.of f 7 and J7 etc doing in Chinese inventories?

J-7 is MiG-21 from the USSR back in the 1950s, at a time when China was dirt poor and underdeveloped. Now that China is a rich country having the world's most powerful industrial base, China operates heavy fighters and medium fighters, not light fighters. J-7 which is light weight like F-5 is replaced by J-10 which is medium weight like F-16.

who told you that F-16 is a medium weight fighter....it is indeed lightweight fighter.

F-16 is built around a single big engine, the ones used by F-15. F-16 is similar in size to F-18A/C and a lot bigger than fighters like Gripen, F-20, JF-17 which are built around a single small engine. F-16 is 18,900 lb empty compared to 13,150 lb for F-20.