What's new

Gül: Turkey will not accept Iran possessing nuclear weapons

Ḥashshāshīn;3767874 said:
:rofl:

Nuclear weapons are the only thing keeping Pakistan together. Without them, Half of Pakistan would be Indian by now.
We should contain guts without nuclear weapon. We should not feel proud of this evil.
 
What would be the most likely action Turkey takes if Iran acquires nuclear weapons?
 
We should contain guts without nuclear weapon. We should not feel proud of this evil.

Evil? It's for defence purposes. It is a deterrent. It is only to be used in retaliation of a foreign nuclear strike, so how is it evil?

What would be the most likely action Turkey takes if Iran acquires nuclear weapons?

Most likely make their own Nuclear weapons.
 
They don't need to attack every time, the only need to attack once..

And it will be all over.

Well as far as we aee concerned they can wait as long as it takes for grass to grew in their shoes before the time comes . We live our daily life and wont give a damn about such predictions
 
Not same language and a different culture and even a different religion
Are you saying that azeri are not going to be shia anymore and become sunni ?


I wonder how you get the idea that turkey wouls be motherland for azerbaiejan , maybe it would be a mother land for Alieve ans Co. But everybody knew azerbaiejan was part of Iran before russia take it away and culturally they are nearer to us than turkey
Men eve gedirem is Azeri. Ben eve gidiyorum is Turkish. Both languages are dialects of old Turkic language, an ordinary Turkish speaker can understand Azeri also.
It was Qajar's (an Azeri dynasty) who was ruling to Iran back then. If you want an Azeri monarch, then sure you can have it too.
 
Ḥashshāshīn;3767894 said:
Evil? It's for defence purposes. It is a deterrent. It is only to be used in retaliation of a foreign nuclear strike, so how is it evil?



Most likely make their own Nuclear weapons.

Wouldn't the greater powers oppose that action since it does not serve them?
 
What would be the most likely action Turkey takes if Iran acquires nuclear weapons?
We already have a civilian nuclear programme and have ambitions to construct at least 10 NPPs in 20 years. Probably if Iran gets one, we'll too.
 
We'll the point Im trying to make is that acquiring nuclear weapons would be a trade off for Turkey, it would weigh pros and cons. It's interesting to discuss these.
 
Wouldn't the greater powers oppose that action since it does not serve them?
Yes, they would oppose, but they won't do sh!t. US and Mossad knew Pakistan was making nukes, they put Pakistan under sanctions but didn't have the balls to physically stop it. Israeli Air force even came to attack the nuclear reactors like they did in Iraq but they couldn't do anything.

Same with Iran. Iran is under sanctions, but US won't do **** to physically stop you from making them.

Turkey has a greater leverage on the west than both Iran and Pak. Plus they're NATO members. If Turkey wants it, they will get it.
 
Ḥashshāshīn;3767913 said:
Yes, they would oppose, but they won't do sh!t. US and Mossad knew Pakistan was making nukes, they put Pakistan under sanctions but didn't have the balls to physically stop it. Israeli Air force even came to attack the nuclear reactors like they did in Iraq but they couldn't do anything.

Same with Iran. Iran is under sanctions, but US won't do **** to physically stop you from making them.

Turkey has a greater leverage on the west than both Iran and Pak. Plus they're NATO members. If Turkey wants it, they will get it.

If there are no repercussions why doesn't it just go ahead now?
 
Ḥashshāshīn;3767894 said:
Evil? It's for defence purposes. It is a deterrent. It is only to be used in retaliation of a foreign nuclear strike, so how is it evil?
How it is for defense purpose, We are making tactical and strategic nuclear capable cruise missiles. This is the big illusion when we talk about minimum deterrence. Non nuclear capable Cruise missile and Ballistic missiles are OK for defense purpose. Look the mishap of leakage of a nuclear plant In Japan. In natural disaster or any Mishap, we have no money and ability to counter this or something this situation. Nuclear missiles are never for defense purpose, this is just a temporary solution, any misunderstanding/event can end our survival with in minutes.
 
Not same language and a different culture and even a different religion
Are you saying that azeri are not going to be shia anymore and become sunni ?


I wonder how you get the idea that turkey wouls be motherland for azerbaiejan , maybe it would be a mother land for Alieve ans Co. But everybody knew azerbaiejan was part of Iran before russia take it away and culturally they are nearer to us than turkey

Different language and religion?

We both speak Turkish and it's just a few letters different and you can understand it easily. So same language.

Secondly we are both Muslim. You know that it was Turks who made iran Shia? There's Shia in other Turkish nations aswell and Turkmens in Iraq some are Shia but they don't care about Shia or Sunni they are Turk and they shout men turkmenem men aslanam. We don't do a distinction between Sunni or Shia.
 
How it is for defense purpose, We are making tactical and strategic nuclear capable cruise missiles. This is the big illusion when we talk about minimum deterrence. Non nuclear capable Cruise missile and Ballistic missiles are OK for defense purpose. Look the mishap of leakage of a nuclear plant In Japan. In natural disaster or any Mishap, we have no money and ability to counter this or something this situation. Nuclear missiles are never for defense purpose, this is just a temporary solution, any misunderstanding can end our survival with in minutes.
Pakistan has the most secure nuclear sites in the world. No one man knows the location of them. Each bit of info is given to different military personnel, and the weapons are not kept together, they are in different parts of the country.

You really think India would hesitate to attack if Pakistan didn't have these weapons?
 
Men eve gedirem is Azeri. Ben eve gidiyorum is Turkish. Both languages are dialects of old Turkic language, an ordinary Turkish speaker can understand Azeri also.
It was Qajar's (an Azeri dynasty) who was ruling to Iran back then. If you want an Azeri monarch, then sure you can have it too.

Qajar was an Iranian dynasty not a turkish one or an alivestani one . I don't knew if a turkish xan understand azeri or not but my friends in university could not understand turkish movies so at least I knew an average Iranian Azeri cant understand what we call Istanbul turkish .

By the way I'm sure we don't want any monarch but for yoir information it's ages that we are not obssessed with such thing as city of birth ans origin and here it's only mentioned only for jokes and yo want believe it or not there are more jokes about abadani and tehrani people than azeri ones . And for the information our supereme leader is Azeri so don't start to ridicule yourself with this discussion about the azeri and persian .its ages since we left these things behind and only care about iran integrity and unity

By the way the day a kurd become turkish prime minister and a tilish become Azerbaijan president then is the day you can start tslking about such matters
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom