Groping Children With Clothes On Is Not Sexual Assault - indian court rules.

[Beefeatergin]

Indian court rules groping a child through clothing isn't sexual assault

The Bombay High Court's verdict cleared a man accused of molesting a 12-year-old girl, but the controversial ruling could end up in the Supreme Court.

www.cbsnews.com

The only pro pedophile country in the world

 

[Rizwan Alam]

What?

 

[Path-Finder]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1354459151766757376

 

[Titanium100]

I give up on India. Beyond circus

 

[ProudPak]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1354459151766757376

Investigate the judge. I bet he is a rapist too

 

[Path-Finder]

Investigate the judge. I bet he is a rapist too

well this is the justice.

Attorney General, KK Venugopal - Recherche Google

www.google.com

 

[ProudPak]

well this is the justice.

Attorney General, KK Venugopal - Recherche Google

www.google.com

I am saying nothing

 

[type93]

You are an indophobe if you disagree with this

 

[Andhadhun]

1. Judge who ruled that was a WOMAN JUDGE.

Justice Pushpa Ganediwala,

2. Judgement has been overturned by the Supreme Court in 1 day.

 

[Path-Finder]

[Breaking] Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment Which Held 'Skin To Skin' Contact Necessary For 'Sexual Assault' Under POCSO Act

The Supreme Court on Wednesday stayed the acquittal of the accused under the Bombay High Court Judgment which held that pressing of breasts of a minor girl without disrobing does not amount to...

www.livelaw.in

well here is more details!

 

[ProudPak]

1. Judge who ruled that was a WOMAN JUDGE.

Justice Pushpa Ganediwala,

2. Judgement has been overturned by the Supreme Court in 1 day.

The fact that a judge made these judgement speaks volumes

 

[Andhadhun]

The fact that a judge made these judgement speaks volumes

Nope, charge was of "sexual assault" which is LEGALLY defined as "penetration".

This was "sexual harassment" Which when the victim is a women is punishable by minimum of 1 year imprisonment.

If victim is minor, the case is under POSCO Act and the minimum punishment is 3 years in Jail.

The charge was wrongly framed.

 

[Dalit]

Nope, charge was of "sexual assault" which is LEGALLY defined as "penetration".

This was "sexual harassment" Which when the victim is a women is punishable by minimum of 1 year imprisonment.

If victim is minor, the case is under POSCO Act and the minimum punishment is 3 years in Jail.

The charge was wrongly framed.

Too little too late. Headlines already made in international newspapers. This is typical Modi behavior. First test the waters and see how everyone reacts. When going gets tough reverse original decision. We have seen it before. Too little too late though.

 

[CIA Mole]

...

 

[ProudPak]

Nope, charge was of "sexual assault" which is LEGALLY defined as "penetration".

This was "sexual harassment" Which when the victim is a women is punishable by minimum of 1 year imprisonment.

If victim is minor, the case is under POSCO Act and the minimum punishment is 3 years in Jail.

The charge was wrongly framed.

I hope it happens to some in your family...like you child...then let's see if you will say nope there was no penetration but he touched everywhere so it ok. You indian..thew(spit)