As far as I fukin know Pak expats arent there to rape little girls... Rather UK accepts Proffesional or students... Both are damn scared of illegal shyt let alone running pedophile rings.
Those @Divergent s uncle jis as she had been calling them uncle jis, whose pics are posted on first page which she kept referring as "some member has posted links that they are not british nationals and are on visas" here is the news about them
These 4 guys are naturalised brits with double passports. After getting convicted their citizenships have been revoked, else they were not on some visas they held british citizenship. And she said they were on visas really what the hell?
Heres the link
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...e-grooming-gang-face-deportation-to-pakistan#
Their pictures and info on those guys is mentioned in the news report.
Even iwas like what? People who go there on visas NEVER even for a second think of engaging in an illegal activity and here shes on s troll roll
Lmao please send me those report links I’m curious. Abuse because I’m blunt and say it how it is? I don’t do being foul with people but I do know how to shut them up. I’m discussing a social issue which is a rising concern and it’s not my fault they’ve turned out to be Pakistanis. So instead of getting wounded over the factual points I’ve presented, why not come up with rational sane points on how to resolve the problem rather than defending it?
Instead of working on "shutting others up" , how abt u shut urself up first and read up the post first before u reply and also go through ur own posted link and entire information cited there.
Firstly that obscure pvt thinkthank u liked to mention and repeatedly quoted, please do memroze its name correctly so not to confuse the readers here In one place u call it Quailiam , on the other it becomes Quilibrium.
And in prev post i have given that think tanks own website link to that report , one has to purchase that report in order to gain full access to its contents and sources and its a pvt org which has nothing to do with government stats , plus newspapers only quoted little overview or summary of that report which Quailium had made public, entire report is not even available in public domain.
Anyways, now This is the news report link u constantly shared?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...se-rotherham-rochdale-newcastle-a8101941.html
This link contains info abt that obscure think tank Qualium (whose entire report is available only on purchase unlike pther gov bodies free reports)
Quailium said that they found out that 264 people convicted from 2005-2015 or 2017 on account of grooming offences , 84 pc were pakistanis.
Now there in britain grooming gangs issue has been v old and in most cases offenders are not arrested. So i dont know how all those convictions can be a reflection of all the grooming gang ethnicities all across the uk, ; also given the scenario people have accused police of not taking action against grooming gangs wich shows many gangs are left untouched,
In the same link below quailium findings further research is published, which u perhaps did not read or avoided to mention on purpose., which is as follows:
"The National Crime Agency’s Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command (CEOP) identifies two types of group-based child abuse.
It says in “Type 1” offenders work in groups such as grooming gangs to target victims based on vulnerability,
while “Type 2” offenders form paedophile rings to carry out abuse because of a specific sexual interest in children.
CEOP research published in 2012 states 85 per cent of offenders found guilty of sexual activity with a minor in 2011 were white.
Another CEOP study released the following year found 75 per cent of offenders in grooming-gang cases were from Asian backgrounds, while 100 per cent in paedophile rings were white."
By the paedophilia thing u were waving around, according to ur own link all paedo Rings crimes are done by whites.
While for grooming gangs they say 75 pc is linked with asians.
Now carrying on with the rest of ur news link.
"However, researchers said their data’s sample size had been too small and more research needed to be conducted."
the above statement also states their sample size was small to exactly clue one up on actual state of affairs
Continued with ur link
"In an inquiry by the Office of the Children’s Commissioner in 2012, 36 per cent of victims of group or gang child abuse identified their attackers as white, 27 per cent as Asian, 16 per cent as black, with 16 per cent unspecified."
According to 2012 report by CEOP which, mind it, is a government body states 36 pc victims blamed whites for the attacks, 27 pc blamed on asians and rest u can read.
CEOP is a government body instituted for child protection.
Now ceops stats are more trustworthy or an obscure think tank called quailium which uses number of convicts ethnicities as the sole parameter?
Lets say even if number of grooming gangs are dominated by asians or pakistanis (lets assume ) even then these offences make up a small part of entire sexual offences against woman and kids happening in uk, but somehow using this accusation entire pakistani community is blamed and is being showcased as some sexual predators and most importantly media has built the impression that majority of sex offences happening in Uk is at the hands of pakistanis.
Some people infact u urself said these gang members engage in these acts due to some backward customs etc etc, dont know what world are u living in these kind of rings though with some different tactics to trap a prey also operate in pakistan and these people who are doing all of this arent upto it die to some customs etc, they are purely criminal minded people who need to be incriminated, tried and convicted if procen guilty.
Also u chose to blame pakistani community for not speaking up, then its not their fault. Its police fault who have not taken action despite the victims reporting incidents to them. The major roadblock here in nabbing the culprits is uk police itself.
Last edited: