What Anglo-Jewish alliance are you talking about? Greece became a backwater centuries ago on its own, then stayed there when the Ottomans invaded. The Jewish did have alot of influence in London and were instrumental in helping create Israel. However, it was never an informal alliance like what exists with the American-Israeli alliance, unless you include certain ethnic Jewish powerbrokers in London, in which case you have a point.Greeks have been marginalized by the Anglo-Jewish alliance for centuries. The only time the Anglo-Jews cared about them was when they could be a useful tool in attacking Turkey.
Sparta has next to no influence on the legacy of Greek Civilization. Greek Civilization owes its legacy to Athens, and some other minor city states. Sparta's main contribution to Greece is its mythological history as a military superstate. This mythological story is also an ancient fabrication because Sparta was simply too puny in size to be considered anything more than a militaristic society and military superstate to other Greek city states.This is ironic, as Greeks are the inheritors of the culture of Sparta, Rome and Byzantium and had science and philosophy when the Anglos were living in caves. Unfortunately, in the modern world, Alexander cannot be repeated.
Roman Civilization has its roots in the Etruscan Civilization which was contempory with the Greek Civilization. The Roman Empire began by Rome conquering Etruscan city states. Rome's expansion eventually reached the southern Italian peninsula where it started absorbing city states that were either founded by or did trade with Greece. This Greek influence, although significant, was not a transformational one as Rome already had its own systems in place for centuries by then. Rome is better described as a melting pot of influences which cannot be pigeonholed because it evolved so much over time. Byzantine was the direct descendant of the classical Roman Empire. By this time, there was so much cross-pollination of different influences across the empire that any reference to Greek influence held little meaning since Greek influence had already put its stamp on the earlier Roman empire transplanted into the later Byzantine. The only truly Greek thing about Byzantine is that its capital was geographically situated close to Greece so it had alot of Greeks living in it.
Concerning Alexander the Great. The famous statement "Alexander the Great conquered the known world" is an oxymoron yet people use it to boost Alexander to being GREAT status. Rome was already known to the Greeks, so was Carthage, so was Egypt. These sorts of historical fallacies and obvious over-exaggerations annoy me. If Alexander the "Great" was so great, then Qin Shi Huang should be called Qin the Great since he conquered all under heaven, China's known civilized world. Why do Americans call their baseball championship the World Series? Ethnocentrism exists today as it did in Greek society. See what I mean? Historical fallacies annoy me.