What's new

Global Firepower - 2013 World Military Strength Ranking

in all those Strength,s still Pakistan is ahead of those Countries

That is simply not true. How can pakistan's economy can be bigger than brazil, south korea and italy???

Smaller economy means less capability to sustain a long drawn war.

Seriously are you people really so naive to not understand what role do the other parameters play in a war other than military factors??
 
if its not the economic factor, why the hell is pakistan not able to wage a war against india for kashmir, rather than waging a low cost proxy war which has low possibility to get blown into a full flegged war??

Its simple, india is making economically impossible for pakistan to wage a full flegged war against india. Apart from this what else is stopping pakistan, it has "the bomb", it has the "aasmani army", what else it needs??
 
Can anyone even consider this data seriously.....

Indian aircraft strength .....1962.........Pakistan.....1531.
Indian Helicopter strength..... 559.......Pakistan......589......30 more than India.
 
Can anyone even consider this data seriously.....

Indian aircraft strength .....1962.........Pakistan.....1531.
Indian Helicopter strength..... 559.......Pakistan......589......30 more than India.

Now compare the economic factors too, to start with, just compare the foreign currency reserves alone to get a better picture.

About the aircrafts, how many of them are 4th generation?? How many are force multipliers like Aewacs?? Or how many are strategic airlifters?? Or how many are combat ready?? Compare qualitatively also.
 
Now compare the economic factors too, to start with, just compare the foreign currency reserves alone to get a better picture.

Is there any point when the figures are so falsified.!!

Pakistan has nowhere near 1500 aircraft or more helicopters than India. !
 
Is there any point when the figures are so falsified.!!

Why you say so?? Foreign reserves are declared every week.

This figure of pakistan having 1500 aircrafts includes fighters, trainers, mid air refuelers, Aewacs, transport and others.
 
just forget about internal figures and statistics it could contain some errors But overall list seems to very accurate and predicable
 
Nice Joke Brazil,Itlay and South korea ahead of Pakistan
does those Countries have Nuclear Warhead,s
does those Countries have Cruise missiles like Babar and RA,AD

South Korea is conventionally stronger & they have a recognized green water navy along with cruise missiles, however i agree that one cannot exclude nuclear weapons from a nuclear power country when assisting their strengths & capabilities, after all "strategic force command" is the 4rth branch of a country's arm-forces like army, air force & navy which currently only 9 countries have U.S,Russia,China,U.K,France,India,Pakistan,Israel(undeclered) & North Korea
 
o yar Pakistan k paas 8 submarines kab sy agayin?
 
did you actually compare india's strength or just posted thoughts from your communist propaganda??



Compare the financial strength, logistical support and ability to wage a long drawn war too.

both France & the U.K are stronger then India after all they don't buy the Rafael they make them, they dint buy INS Vikrant in fact they built it originally known as HMS Hercules , i am not saying India should not be in the top ten it should definitely be but putting it in the forth place ahead of a power like France & U.K is stretching it too far
 
both France & the U.K are stronger then India after all they don't buy the Rafael they make them, they dint buy INS Vikrant in fact they built it originally known as HMS Hercules , i am not saying India should not be in the top ten it should definitely be but putting it in the forth place ahead of a power like France & U.K is stretching it too far

brother army bhi koi cheez hoti hai, sab kuch AF or Navy ni hoti

o yar Pakistan k paas 8 submarines kab sy agayin?

oh sorry got it, they might be including midgets too
 
both France & the U.K are stronger then India after all they don't buy the Rafael they make them, they dint buy INS Vikrant in fact they built it originally known as HMS Hercules , i am not saying India should not be in the top ten it should definitely be but putting it in the forth place ahead of a power like France & U.K is stretching it too far

Have you ever heard of strategic depth? Manpower? Resources?

If not, just recall what happened in WW2. USSR was deemed inferior in tech, military tactics, equipments everything as compared to the Germans. Look what happened at the end.

India's size (strategic depth), just the sheer manpower, resources (natural as well as human) is enough to make it more stronger than UK/ France.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom