Global Firepower - 2013 World Military Strength Ranking

[Rocky rock]

Global Firepower Military Ranks - 2013

Pakistan on 12th

 

[kawaraj]

What bullsh!t is this?

Japan is behind Indonesia, Egypt and South Korea? What a good ranking....

 

[kawaraj]

And how long you think pakistan can sustain war?? Does it has money to buy any weapons compared to brazil?? How will you get the money to buy weapons after you army fired the initial salvo?? Maybe that is the time your enemy will strike hardest.

This high headed thinking is the reason for pakistan's defeat in all the wars it fought with india. You people are far away from reality.

Good point but kindly use your justifying reasoning to explain how a small weak nation South Korea is so far ahead of Japan in this egghead ranking if your think my country is not even sustain a war with Brazil?

 

[Varunastra]

only the first 4 are correct

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Have you ever heard of strategic depth? Manpower? Resources?

If not, just recall what happened in WW2. USSR was deemed inferior in tech, military tactics, equipments everything as compared to the Germans. Look what happened at the end.

India's size (strategic depth), just the sheer manpower, resources (natural as well as human) is enough to make it more stronger than UK/ France.

In that case the U.K ruled India when it was even larger with even more strategic depth ! plus a country close to the size of India's (1,240,000 sq mi) called Argentina @ (1,073,518 sq mi) was defeated by the U.K (94,060 sq mi) in the 1982 Falkland war,plus you also have the Arab-Israeli war of 67 where a smaller country defeated multiple countries with much larger size & manpower , after all we are taking about military strength & not geography & population explosion a country of 1 million people but with good quality of life, literacy, has always been in a better position then a country of 10 million people with less quality of life, literacy etc

 

[Pakistanisage]

< This person doesnt reply to retarded idiots with no intellect.......sorry try again!

That would include 90% of Indian members of PDF whose sole mission in life is to TROLL.

 

[Tridibans]

In that case the U.K ruled India when it was even larger with even more strategic depth ! plus a country close to the size of India's (1,240,000 sq mi) called Argentina @ (1,073,518 sq mi) was defeated by the U.K (94,060 sq mi) in the 1982 Falkland war,plus you also have the Arab-Israeli war of 67 where a smaller country defeated multiple countries with much larger size & manpower , after all we are taking about military strength & not geography & population explosion a country of 1 million people but with good quality of life, literacy, has always been in a better position then a country of 10 million people with less quality of life, literacy etc

Only difference is that India's military is not only far far better than Argentina and the Mughals/ Marathas, etc. but also, the point of strategic depth made by me TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE MILITARY as well and not just geography. Case in point is USSR, who had a huge huge army/ AF/ Navy but lacked tech/ tactics etc. as compared to Germany. Also, USSR/ India, though might not be that up to date in terms of military tech, they were/ are not rag tag by any means. Infact, USSR would have beaten UK or USA one on one during the early 1940's .

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Good point but kindly use your justifying reasoning to explain how a small weak nation South Korea is so far ahead of Japan in this egghead ranking if your think my country is not even sustain a war with Brazil?

who said South korea is weak ?

South Korea is militarily very strong, above all they have a "green water navy"

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Only difference is that India's military is not only far far better than Argentina and the Mughals/ Marathas, etc. but also, the point of strategic depth made by me TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE MILITARY as well and not just geography. Case in point is USSR, who had a huge huge army/ AF/ Navy but lacked tech/ tactics etc. as compared to Germany. Also, USSR/ India, though might not be that up to date in terms of military tech, they were/ are not rag tag by any means. Infact, USSR would have beaten UK or USA one on one during the early 1940's .

only a fool will think India to be a rag tag army, mate i agree India is in the "top 10" i just disagree that its stronger then France & the U.K , yes it is in the 5th or 6th position in "the top 10"

 

[Ayush]

just one thing mate, can you tell me what is your armed force's strength ?
-air , navy, army , weapons technology
@Ayush , he called you kaayar

i tend to avoid trolls.

 

[kawaraj]

who said South korea is weak ?

South Korea is militarily very strong, above all they have a "green water navy"

SK is a weak nation. This nation (both koreas conbined) has never came out of the hands of Japan and China in the entire history and that still hold the truth today.

SK's "green water navy" is waterlocked by Japanese and Chinese navy. I'd call it Narmy.

 

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

I came across an interesting website:
Global Firepower - 2013 World Military Strength Ranking
Current Top Ten:
1. U.S.A.
2. Russia
3. China
4. India
5. U.K.
6. France
7. Germany
8. South Korea
9. Italy
10. Brazil

For seeing the latest military ranking:
Global Firepower Military Ranks - 2013

For seeing the different factors on which this ranking was done:
Waterway Coverage by Country

For comparing military strength any two countries:
Military Strength Comparison

Assumptions:
Nuclear capability is not taken into account. So don't start those megaton brain farts here.
Only conventional war fighting capabilities across land, air and sea is considered.
Logistical and financial capabilities are also taken into account.
It only provides a rough idea.
Not to be taken too seriously.

Nice to see Viet Nam for the first time in the ranking!

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Don't take it that seriously...

 

[RazorMC]

...
Case in point is USSR, who had a huge huge army/ AF/ Navy but lacked tech/ tactics etc. as compared to Germany
...

Do you know how many countries Germany-Austria were fighting simultaneously ??
WW2 is not a Russian victory, but an Allied one where the main driving force was the US.

 

[genmirajborgza786]

SK is a weak nation. This nation (both koreas conbined) has never came out of the hands of Japan and China in the entire history and that still hold the truth today.

SK's "green water navy" is waterlocked by Japanese and Chinese navy. I'd call it Narmy.

mate your post doesn't makes sense