SBD-3
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 15,120
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
My source is saying Nazir Butt is the chosen one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gen Raheel was also in no one's list when the race to COAS started. The strongest candidates kept changing, the weakest one came out to be the winnerThis thread started with Gen Janjua's name as a strong candidate... now his name not even in the news....i think no journalist knows actually wht is going to happen....i think, they start floating names on their personal hunch...nothing else
Gen Raheel was also in no one's list when the race to COAS started. The strongest candidates kept changing, the weakest one came out to be the winnerThis thread started with Gen Janjua's name as a strong candidate... now his name not even in the news....i think no journalist knows actually wht is going to happen....i think, they start floating names on their personal hunch...nothing else
ISI is fully subordinate to the Pakistani state and its interests. ISI is a military intelligence organization not a civilian one, therefore it has to be lead by a military officer.
And ISI should come under the command of COAS not PM.
And the COAS should come under the command of the PM too.
that wont be possible until the PM shows atleast a small bit of competenceAnd the COAS should come under the command of the PM too.
Only when if the PM is not corrupt.
that wont be possible until the PM shows atleast a small bit of competence
No, the Constitution does not say that. The COAS is ALWAYS under the command of the PM. If the PM is corrupt, he is answerable to Parliament and the people and NEVER to the COAS.
The PM's performance is judged at elections by the people, and NEVER by the Army. It is not for the COAS to act illegally and think that he is above the law to justify usurping power.
I think it is the duty of all the politicians including the PM to obey the constitution which he has been violating since the protest has began or maybe since early 90s.
The PM's performance is judged at elections by the people, and NEVER by the Army. It is not for the COAS to act illegally and think that he is above the law to justify usurping power.
That guy can't even formulate an opinion of his own and needs a noora to help him out in a sticky situation. If the PM was ever found to be dependent on someone else when it comes to making decisions, won't it be obvious as to why he needs someone else to give instructions to him?
I don't buy that BULLSHIT that pseudo liberals keep on with, that the military has a hand in the decision making of this country. If they ever did have a degree of influence ever since this democracy started to "flourish" in Pakistan, then we would be at a better state than where we are today.
Your post has no relevance to the fact that the Constitution clearly describes the roles of the PM and the COAS and also establishes how they are to be judged.