VCheng
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2010
- Messages
- 48,460
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
There's an Indus Basin Treaty too, wither compliance and then there's reason to ignore Simla:
(a) Doesn't specifically mention Kashmir
(b) India hasn't respected bilateral treaties as mentioned above.
(c) For 43 years, we waited to let India bring peace there but should unilateral slaughter continue there.
Any good international lawyer can rebut. I'm no law guy.
It mentions ALL bilateral disputes.
And both the Indus Water and Simla treaties remain in force. Pakistan has never proven any violations by India of the IWT.
Bhutto signed away any aspirations of getting Kashmir diplomatically or militarily a long while back. Any favor is at the mercy of India.
Well, India can agree to third party mediation, and then things might move forward. But it is India's choice as both parties must consent to third party mediation.