What's new

Gen Bajwa rubbishes Indian army chief's claim of 'so-called surgical strikes' on Pakistan

BBC said Indians crossed the LOC and were sent back by the Pakistan army. Attack failed. No army posts are located on point zero. You would have been successful if you would have crossed our posts. Trying to attack and successfully attack are different things.
Shah mehmood qureshi crossed international border and did surgical strike in india.
Bare ho jao Indians.
Bsf guy saluted him. Hope we stay peaceful like this.
 
.
BBC. confirmed we crossed the border by over akm and took positions inside Pakistani territory and fired on Pakistani positions for over two hours .
Are you ready to accept what BBC has to say?

The report exposed how unprepared Pakistan Army is and how we destroyed your posts while firing from inside your territory.
You guys should have taken the opportunity to destroy "terrorist" HQ in Pakistan, stop whining about Dawood, Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar if you have such a mighty army and SF.
 
.
Anyone familiar with Azad kashmir will find this report funnier than a sardar Joke. While the Indian side always complain about their soldiers beheading by their own discovered Pak team of "BAT" they claim word surgical strike to crossing Loc and hitting two Pakistani posts.
 
.
Anyone familiar with Azad kashmir will find this report funnier than a sardar Joke. While the Indian side always complain about their soldiers beheading by their own discovered Pak team of "BAT" they claim word surgical strike to crossing Loc and hitting two Pakistani posts.
It is actually the Pakistani side which complains to UN observers about beheadings:
http://www.dawn.com/news/782394
 
.
.
.
did you read and understand the comment completely? Answer is in the comment itself.

Yup I read it. Indians are desperate to prove their surgical strikes to Pakistanis even though they have very little to prove it.

ISPR not providing total figures is not a guesswork but facts.

But whatever you are saying on this thread is merely guesswork and assumptions.
 
. .
So this comedy continues

The Indian government was foolish to publicise such an operation - assuming it did happen. It was unnecessary and put Pakistan in a spot politically.

But the constant denial by Pakistani leaders and army officers is even more foolish - if such a thing is possible.

Stike or no strike, the Americans, the Russians and the Chinese must be enjoying a good laugh at this circus.
 
.
The moment the indian government refused to provide ANY evidence

they slapped the indian public and fanboys in the face

but because of that old indian ego they just cant bare to admit it


The indian excuse for not releasing any evidence is pitifully transparent no one asked them to provide second by second details but their refusal to provide anything is telling


indians need to accept the big wet slap their government and military gave them and step out of their delusions

You want to be a supa pawa but this is the best you can do against a 7 times smaller state
You want to be a supa pawa but a country 7 times smaller and with Nawaz Sharif as a PM is diplomatically outmaneuvering you

You should open your eyes indians
 
.
The moment the indian government refused to provide ANY evidence

What evidence would you find acceptable - as the Pakistani government?

After the Mumbai attack, the Indian government shared evidence showing
- a captured and alive pakistani whose father identified him
- Kasab's confession and judicial testimony
- phone calls by the terrorists over satellite phones to locations in Pakistan and the call records
- pakistan army stamped provisions
- ammunition bearing marking indicating source as pakistani army

Yet none of this was accepted by the Pakistan Government. So what purpose would evidence of the strikes serve?
 
.
your evidence was shoddy and made up

in this case your evidence is non existent
 
. . . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom