Foinikas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
- Messages
- 12,710
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Bias for Israel? Stop this song,you've been repeating it too much. There's truth in some of their claims just like there is truth in some of the Hamas claims as well. As for the "prolonged violence",we've seen what prolonged violence brought to Palestinians. It failed as a tactic. It literally brought no strategic gain to the Palestinians. On the contrary,it brought it caused them to lose even more land and support.Hard to say if you can ever be 'balanced' about this conflict, knowing the history of your posts here showing a clear bias for Israel. But this post is just naivete: Israelis never had, and never will, agree to anything but at most a Bantustan. Hamas's oxygen is coming from the West Bank and the Israeli subjugation of that. And the only way Israel is going to come to a meaningful compromise would be through prolonged violence. And, please, don't share your fallacies about how the Palestinians have 'missed' opportunities for peace. Israelis never offered anything better than even the Bantustan of Barak in 2000. At any rate, time for discussing the historic events is gone--it is GONE!
It's HISTORICAL REALITY. It's a fact. Look where they started in 1947 and look how it went from 1948 onwards!
This was the tactic they tried:
Tell me,what did all that achieve? On a strategic level,what did the Palestinians achieve with this?