French military base in Aleppo under construction

[A.P. Richelieu]

First a big lol to your comment ...then a piece of advice to you...Google how France toppled down the Qaddafi regieme and who bombed his convoy !


Very soon ...I am in France because I had won a scholarship and neither I had chosen France nor it was my desire to be here ....It was the decision of the education authority ....If given a choice I would've gone to Timbuktu than Provence ...! And may be you ask NATO and Russia and Israel to get out and return all that what is not theirs ...!

The French stopped him in his tracks, by bombing the convoy, the actual killings were done by Libyans.

Hes right, unnecessary intervention will only cause you lot to shit in your pants


They also agreed on failed invasion of Iraq under the false pretext of non-existent WMD. Killing more than thousands of people. UN SC judgment is not divine

Does not change the fact that they are the only ones with authority in such issues.

 

[MarkusS]

You keep on laughing your *** off ...your taunt is no where close to what the ground reality is ...!


Son , It wasn't Adele who 'set fire to the rain'....It was French Navy Charles De Gaulle who rained fire on Libiya !

Dont blame me. We italians were quite happy with Gaddafi

 

[salarsikander]

Does not change the fact that they are the only ones with authority in such issues.

But sure does result in killing of hundred thousands if not millions of people. Its same as having tyrnacial throne nothing less than that !

 

[Sage]

Dont blame me. We italians were quite happy with Gaddafi

Libyans were happy too ...US, France and UK laid waste to it ...Libya is a heap of rubble now !

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

But sure does result in killing of hundred thousands if not millions of people. Its same as having tyrnacial throne nothing less than that !

The decision by some Sunni Iraqis to try to regain control over the Shia majority, after the Baath party
was toppled is the major cause of casualties.
That is solely the responsibility of the Sunni.
They could have accepted the fact that Iraq is mostly Shia.

 

[hussain0216]

The decision by some Sunni Iraqis to try to regain control over the Shia majority, after the Baath party
was toppled is the major cause of casualties.
That is solely the responsibility of the Sunni.
They could have accepted the fact that Iraq is mostly Shia.

let them work it out

when you stick your oar in, you own the consequences

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Libyans were happy too ...US, France and UK laid waste to it ...Libya is a heap of rubble now !

Are You sure the Libyans beeing murdered by Ghaddafis security forces agree?
It all started when the dictator started to kill his own people.
Libya is a rubble, because Libyans self appointed warlords care more about power than about Libya.

 

[salarsikander]

The decision by some Sunni Iraqis to try to regain control over the Shia majority, after the Baath party
was toppled is the major cause of casualties.
That is solely the responsibility of the Sunni.
They could have accepted the fact that Iraq is mostly Shia.

thats wasnt the reason for invasion ! It was fake WMD. And what happens in Iraq is none of business of UNSC

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

let them work it out

when you stick your oar in, you own the consequences

Still it is their decision, and they suffer the consequences.
Our problems are insignificant in comparision.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

thats wasnt the reason for invasion ! It was fake WMD. And what happens in Iraq is none of business of UNSC

No, obviously the Sunni insurgency would not have occured if the Baath party had not been toppled.
Still, it is their decision, to start a brutal civil war, instead if accepting reality.
They therefore have the responsibility.
Shia Iraqi politicians embarking on sectaritarian politics are not blameless.

The UNSC make it their business and have the right to interfere.
They decide among themselves what their limits are.
Veto power can block decisions, but cannot enforce decisions.
The members are elected by the other members, and represent the world.
Iraq, by beeing a member of the UN accepts that.

 

[salarsikander]

The UNSC make it their business and have the right to interfere.

Then why dont they interfere in Palestine or in Burma for that matter or perhaps even in North Korea ?

UNSC invaded Iraq under the false pretext of non existent WMD

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Then why dont they interfere in Palestine or in Burma for that matter or perhaps even in North Korea ?

UNSC invaded Iraq under the false pretext of non existent WMD

The UNSC has intervened many times in the Israel-Arab conflict.
Generally it is believed that the Israelis and Palestinians need to get to an agreement.
Burma has not developed to a crisis, worthy of UNSC intervention.

UNSC invaded Iraq, because Saddam pretended to have WMD.
His mistake, but he hanged for it, so all is good.

 

[salarsikander]

UNSC invaded Iraq, because Saddam pretended to have WMD.

What A load of Bollocks, So he pretended to have WMD and an entire panel or should I say bunch of losers got an excuse to demonstrate their expansionism. Dude, what you smoking ?
Now brace for more Attacks from UNSC creation known as ISIS

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

What A load of Bollocks, So he pretended to have WMD and an entire panel or should I say bunch of losers got an excuse to demonstrate their expansionism. Dude, what you smoking ?
Now brace for more Attacks from UNSC creation known as ISIS

ISIS is on the retreat, I think much to Your chagrine.
They will be insignificant before long...

ISIS i spured attacks will probably continue, and can hurt individuals, but not nations.
They will never accomplish anything.
Morale at ISIS is at rock bottom, for good reason. They are a sorry lot of losers, if any.

 

[salarsikander]

They are a sorry lot of losers, if any.

And an creation of Western imperialism at its best
EDIT: Lol, thinking to my Humiliation ? and for what ? How much is there, if any, difference btw ISIS or UN SC for that matter