What's new

Forget China, our competition is Bangladesh now. Only PM doesn’t acknowledge this

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5

Forget China, our competition is Bangladesh now. Only PM doesn’t acknowledge this​

If we don’t talk about the fact that an average Indian today earns less than a Bangladeshi, will the fact vanish? No. But the daily news cycle is filled with jubilation at activists being locked up​

By Aakar Patel
Updated: 11 Jul 2022, 8:16 AM IST


The automobile sector is half of India’s total manufacturing sector. But its share slipped to 13% in 2021, resulting in massive job losses (Representative Photo)
The automobile sector is half of India’s total manufacturing sector. But its share slipped to 13% in 2021, resulting in massive job losses (Representative Photo)



The average Gross Domestic Product per person of the world is $12,200 per year. This is about Rs 9.6 lakh per year or Rs.80,000 per person per month. Meaning that if we take the entire world’s GDP, all goods and services and divide it by the world’s population we get the numbers above.

In 2013, Bangladesh’s GDP per person was $981 and India’s was $1,449. This lead has always been present and India has always been ahead of Bangladesh. When after the war of 1971 Bangladesh was born it was seen by many as an unviable state, meaning that it would never be economically productive enough to sustain itself.

The famous American Secretary of State Henry Kissinger is said to have referred to Bangladesh as a ‘basket case’.

After 2014, Bangladesh began to catch up with India. In 2016 the numbers were almost even (Bangladesh $1,679, India $1,732). Then we were even and then Bangladesh went ahead. In 2021, according to the World Bank’s data Bangladesh was at USD 2,503 while India is at USD 2,277. Today the average person in Bangladesh makes about Rs. 2 lakh per year (Rs.16,000 per month) while the average Indian makes Rs. 1.8 lakh per year.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) says that for the foreseeable future Bangladesh is expected to be ahead of India.

Now, a few things need to be addressed. First while all of us here must be disappointed with our own performance we should acknowledge and applaud what Bangladesh has achieved. From being seen as a basket case to going on to become a global champion in garments exports would not have been easy, but they have achieved it.

The next thing to do is to ask where we have gone wrong. This is not easy to do. India does not acknowledge that it is doing badly when it comes to economic growth. If one listens to the speeches of the prime minister or looks at the narrative in the media it is not one that is reflective of the numbers we have seen above.

India is the ‘fastest growing major economy’ and that is the end of that. We have no problems and therefore there is neither the need to reflect on our position and certainly there is no cause to see what needs to be corrected.

If we don’t talk about the fact that Bangladesh has overtaken us then the problem doesn’t exist. And yet it does.

A short time ago the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers put out some numbers on domestic sales of their goods for the five years leading up to March 2020. The society concluded that their sector was in a ‘structural, long term and deep slowdown’ and that more research needed to be conducted to find out what was going on.

More research by whom? That was not said but we can assume they meant by the government or by its thinktank Niti Aayog. The automobile sector is half of India’s total manufacturing sector. In 2014 manufacturing was 16% of GDP meaning that the automobile sector contributed to 8% of GDP.

Because of the slowdown in the sales of automobiles the share of manufacturing in GDP slipped to 13% in 2021 and is probably lower today. Manufacturing is the place where most developing nations compete for jobs. India’s inability to provide meaningful jobs to its people can in many ways be explained by its inability to boost manufacturing. Not just not able to boost it, as the numbers tell us, but not even able to hold on to what we had.

We refer to ourselves as Vishwaguru, and there is no doubt that India has many things to teach the world just as it has many things to learn from the world. However, the average Indian produces less than a fifth of what the average global citizen produces. China (USD 12,556) is today even with the world, meaning that the average Chinese person produces what the average world person produces. This means that today we have one-fifth the economic power of China.

It will interest readers to know that India and China were even in 1991 when we launched what is called the economic reforms. Both nations were at about USD 300 per person in that year. Today the world does not see us as peers. China is a Great Power which in international relations means that it can effectively project its power outside its borders.

It is the primary strategic threat to the USA’s dominance or influence over the world. It is expected to catch up with the US in terms of overall GDP (though not per person) in the next few years. It has according to some experts almost caught up with the US in military power.

When our prime minister attends BRICS or G20 or another forum the assumption is that he goes there in a group of peers. Of course, this is true in so far as we accept that all nations are equal. But in a room where those gathered are aware of their power and of the power of others, the dynamics will not be the same as that of the group photo.

India will need to do a lot of hard work to be able to influence the world, to be able to lift its people out of poverty and into prosperity. We will need in fact to do a lot of work even to catch up with Bangladesh.

Can this happen in a nation where the daily news cycle is filled with glee at activists being locked up because of their tweets? In my opinion it is not possible, but we do not have to wait a long time to find out. The world is changing at a faster rate than it has in history and our place in the world and our future will be obvious to all before the current decade is over.

 
The famous American Secretary of State Henry Kissinger is said to have referred to Bangladesh as a ‘basket case’.
I have never seen a single article written by an Indian/Pakistani without this "must include" reference. Of course, post independent war-ravaged country with its intelligentsia wiped off was not looking like a paragon of development;-) But it was no surprise the "defeated" mass murdering racist monster would utter any sweet sympathetic words for Bangladesh.

But he and his boss reserved the cruelest words for Indians ;-)

ref: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/opinion/nixon-racism-india.html
Or, Nixon Library for your aural pleasure


Undoubtedly the most unattractive women in the world are the Indian women,” said Mr. Nixon. “Undoubtedly,” he repeated, with a venomous tone.

He continued, “The most sexless, nothing, these people. I mean, people say, what about the Black Africans? Well, you can see something, the vitality there, I mean they have a little animallike charm, but God, those Indians, ack, pathetic. Uch.” “They turn me off. They are repulsive and it’s just easy to be tough with them.”... “I don’t know how they reproduce!”
He condemned Indians as a whole, his voice oozing with contempt, “They are a scavenging people.”
Mr. Kissinger
sweepingly explained: “They are superb flatterers, Mr. President. They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That’s how they survived 600 years. They suck up — their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.”
.... Mr. Kissinger told the president, “I tell you, the Pakistanis are fine people, but they are primitive in their mental structure.” He added, “They just don’t have the subtlety of the Indians.”
 
I have never seen a single article written by an Indian/Pakistani without this "must include" reference. Of course, post independent war-ravaged country with its intelligentsia wiped off was not looking like a paragon of development;-) But it was no surprise the "defeated" mass murdering racist monster would utter any sweet sympathetic words for Bangladesh.

But he and his boss reserved the cruelest words for Indians ;-)

ref: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/opinion/nixon-racism-india.html
Or, Nixon Library for your aural pleasure

There is nothing to see in Nixon's or Kissinger's statements. Nixon was a primitive racist monkey at the same level of Churchill. Kissinger while being extremely smart joined the chorus with him, was probably being a sycophant. There are extremely beautiful women in the subcontinent whether in Pakistan, India or Bangladesh.
 
I have never seen a single article written by an Indian/Pakistani without this "must include" reference. Of course, post independent war-ravaged country with its intelligentsia wiped off was not looking like a paragon of development;-) But it was no surprise the "defeated" mass murdering racist monster would utter any sweet sympathetic words for Bangladesh.

But he and his boss reserved the cruelest words for Indians ;-)

ref: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/opinion/nixon-racism-india.html
Or, Nixon Library for your aural pleasure
But, whatever was said by other people yesterday, can you not see BD remains today an unsuccessful country not much above the basket case level?

What is our development except producing a few million meters of textile goods? Can you cite any other sector or can you not see how many billions of dollars BD has so far borrowed?

It cannot produce almost no mechanical technology goods. BD is a case of underachievement, yet BD people talk as if BD is another giant Japan or Germany.
 
The good thing is BJP can no longer use BD illegal immmigrants as election agenda for vote bank politics, soon this entire issue of illegal migrants will be sorted out as more and more of them will return home on their own. Some have already left.
 
India and BD should use each other as a yardstick to check their level of economic performance.

BD should also target to try to catch up with the richest Indian states like Gujarat within the next 10-15 years, which is of course difficult but realistic if it can raise it's current GDP growth of 7-8% a year to the 8-9% sustained once enough of the major infrastructure projects come online in the middle of this decade(Padma Bridge, Padma bridge rail link, Roopur nuclear, Matarbari power and port etc.)
 
Last edited:
@Baba_Yaga

BJP can no longer use BD illegal immmigrants as election agenda for vote bank politics,

No worries some other agenda will be found out

Regards

What about NRC? And CAA?

Isn’t that going to propel all Hindus to leave BD?

That will add another 20 million termites to India.
 
What about NRC? And CAA?

Isn’t that going to propel all Hindus to leave BD?

That will add another 20 million termites to India.



2 million BD Hindus have moved back in the last 10 years into BD.

Many millions more are likely to follow over this decade and next as BD economy keep getting better and better.

BD Hindu population is growing as share of total population.
 
@UKBengali

UKB Dada (Hope it is OK to address you as Dada)

India and BD should use each other as a yardstick to check their level of economic performance.

Indeed there is much that each can learn from the other and cooperate.

@PadmaBridge

That will add another 20 million termites to India.

BD Hindus are considered regular Indians, not termites

Regards
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom