What's new

FC recovers bomb making literature, maps of targets, from college in Balochistan

Too big mentality has your judgement clouded, that doesn't apply to our demography.

Then good for you, but Punjab domination in Pakistan is not some myth but a fact.
 
@Jade

60 % of total population of Pakistan lives in Punjab
Punjab in fact is the least represented province on central level percentagewise
 
Last edited:
@Jade

60 % of total population of Pakistan lives in Punjab
Punjab in fact is the least represented province on central level statistically

The point that 60% of Pakistan is Punjab is enough to give jitters to other ethnicities.
 
Kids, especially college kids...are always gonna be drawn to this type of stuff. As long as it doesn't get too serious....leave it alone and they will become good Republicans. If it gets to the point where actual violence is an issue...bring the hammer down.
 
Again not true . There are more Baluchis in Punjab then there are in Balochistan

My point is demographically Punjabis are dominant. When there is a domination of particular group or ethnicity, there will be fear among minorities for being overrun by the majority. Remember 1947 when India was partitioned (Muslims feared that Hindus would dominate them) and remember 1971 when Pakistan broke into two (Bengalis feared Punjabis will dominate them)
 
My point is demographically Punjabis are dominant. When there is a domination of particular group or ethnicity, there will be fear among minorities for being overrun by the majority. Remember 1947 when India was partitioned (Muslims feared that Hindus would dominate them) and remember 1971 when Pakistan broke into two (Bengalis feared Punjabis will dominate them)

In 1947 , the issue was "religion" , ...... In 1971 Bengalis were a majority . So none of these examples fits in this scenario
And Mostly Pakistan has been ruled by Non Punjabi political rulers and non Punjabi dictators .
 
In 1947 , the issue was "religion" , ...... In 1971 Bengalis were a majority . So none of these examples fits in this scenario
And Mostly Pakistan has been ruled by Non Punjabi political rulers and non Punjabi dictators .

As I said before: Good luck to Pakistan.
 
It was reported that a nationalist party was forcing this Indian printed literature in the said college.
Same way Pakistan's political parties are changing the circular of Pakistani schools, introducing new history made in India and teaching about hinduism, secularism.

Only, blinds would not see, what politicians are doing to Pakistan and i mean the ones sitting quietly in opposition.

If Opposition wish they can force a President to resign and leave the country immediately after his elections but when stories of nishan-e-Haider are taken away they turn face to other side.

tumblr_mkj07kuAWy1qddanco1_400.gif


And good luck to India too ; the country with the largest number of ongoing separatist movements in the whole world

But no separations unlike pakistan which crumbled like a cookie in 71 and lost more than 50 percent of its citizens .
 
Baluchistan is understandable but why sindh? May be they are not happy with the monopoly of punjab in everything?

Sindhi Muslims thought that by supporting Pakistan, they will overcome the dominance of educated Sindhi Hindus and everything would belong to them, but Muhajirs took it while Sindhi Muslims remained the same. Still today Sindhi Muslims remained a predominantly rural people.
 
Back
Top Bottom