What's new

Europe’s Terror Blowback: From Charlie Hebdo to Manchester Bombing

and Iran is actually a state sponsor of terrorism too
Your American masters are the true face of governmental terrorism dude
They trained and created Taliban against Soviets presence in Afghanistan and used Muslims like a feet soldiers for their dirty war games.
Bastard Americans supported ISIS in the first days of it's appearance calling them resistance group.
Apparently you are blind or like to show yourself a blind idiot
The orange pig confessed, Obama and Clinton created ISIS and supported them with logistics going through regional puppets into Syria and Iraq. Google it and watch the video, orange swine is extremely right

We protected Hezbollah, we will do it until there is no cancer called Israel in our region, will kill your Zionists planted shits in our region to the last one. Put it in your skull, you created Israel in our Islamic world with violence and we will respond you with violence. The hard job in Syria and Iraq is going to get finished, set your stopwatch , record the final days of your bastard called Israel.

I give you some examples of USA's organized terrorism, believe it if you have the least human emotions in your heart or ignore it if you are like the American swines.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/04/khmer-rouge-cambodian-genocide-united-states/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_United_States
www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/tgif-truman-killing-innocents/
https://sputniknews.com/us/201603301037172102-us-vietnam-genocide-whitewash-massacre/
http://www.salon.com/2015/11/10/henry_kissingers_genocidal_legacy_partner/

These are a tiny corner of USA's crimes all around the world. They deserve those slogans
 
LOL at some comments on here. :lol:

According to some people's logic on here, the main mistake our government made was allowing this "oppressed/persecuted" Libyan terrorist refugee and his family to seek asylum in our country. Luckily for him we are quite liberal and tolerant, so our people don't even question this part of this case despite the "blowback" from granting this terror family asylum from "persecution/oppression" in their home country . So we should look into this "refugee/asylum seeker stuff much more vigorously or maybe even ban it for sometime like Trump? .:D
 
LOL at some comments on here. :lol:

According to some people's logic on here, the main mistake our government made was allowing this "oppressed/persecuted" Libyan terrorist refugee and his family to seek asylum in our country. Luckily for him we are quite liberal and tolerant, so our people don't even question this part of this case despite the "blowback" from granting this terror family asylum from "persecution/oppression" in their home country . So we should look into this "refugee/asylum seeker stuff much more vigorously or maybe even ban it for sometime like Trump? .:D

This case is a classic example of there being no "good" terrorist.

UK has not learnt from the example of the Taliban, who were helped by Pakistan to gain power in
Afghanistan and then the Taliban turned their guns on the Pakistanis.

Now when are Blair and Cameron going to appear in court to answer for their crimes against Iraq and Libya?
 
This case is a classic example of there being no "good" terrorist.

UK has not learnt from the example of the Taliban, who were helped by Pakistan to gain power in
Afghanistan and then the Taliban turned their guns on the Pakistanis.

Now when are Blair and Cameron going to appear in court to answer for their crimes against Iraq and Libya?
True to some extent, but not just that. As I said before, as a major western power, you are DAMNED if you do something, DAMNED if you don't. You will be criticise whatever the decision you make by both sides.
Just like I said earlier, when Tony Blair made peace and sign a partnership/semi alliance agreement with Gadaffi while launching a crackdown on these islamic groups trying to topple Gadaffi, people here in Britain and the world alike both our leftist, members of public,NGOs,Himan rights groups and even many muslims here and abroad where criticising 'blood thirsty' Tony Blair for partnering with yet another brutal islamic dictator/terrorist regime in oppressing/massacring his own poor Muslim population who oppose his brutal rule and how we were doing all this for 'oil' .Lol

When the tables turned with the Libyan uprisings, these people where still the first to question why western powers are doing nothing to stop this brutal crackdown and killing of peaceful protesters, and yet when we intervened they were still the same people to condemn "western imperialism" seeking instability in Muslim countries and killing poor Muslims in Muslim lands. Etc.l OK

So no matter the decision you make as a U S/U K,French or western leader in this part of the world, you will be criticise and condemn, you just have to choose your medicine. Lol

Just imagine the reaction of these same people if Tony Blair refused to grant asylum/refugee status to these "oppressed" Libyan citizens. They will be chanting: "Blood tasty Tony Blair taking money from Gadaffi to oppress poor innocent libyan people and let them die under an oppressive western backed dictatorship".:p:.
 
Europe should seriously consider banning Muslim refugees from the middle east.

They are going to pose a serious security threat.
 
Mike Arnold shared a link to the group: Global War on Terrorism is bogus.
2 hrs ·
Hidden in plain sight and thoroughly documented in the public domain: the ballistics of the bullet that killed WPC Yvonne Fletcher, Patrick Haseldine and advance knowledge for the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, the free-fall collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, etc.

The same old pantomime is again being repeated; we have new actors but essentially it is the same old script as used for WPC Yvonne Fletcher. The same old scripts, the same old harassments, the same old coincidences can only mean the same old game.

“When will they ever learn, when will they ever learn?”

MI5 to review its handling of intelligence on Manchester bomber
r

FILE PHOTO: Armed police officers stand near the Manchester Arena, where U.S. singer Ariana Grande had been performing, in Manchester, in northern England, Britain May 23, 2017. REUTERS/Andrew Yates/File Photo
By Costas Pitas | LONDON

Britain's MI5 has begun an internal review of how it handled intelligence on Manchester suicide bomber Salman Abedi, who was known to the authorities but not under active investigation, a source told Reuters on Monday.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd said the review was the "right first step" for the intelligence agency to take in the wake of the May 22 bombing that killed 22 people at a pop concert by U.S. singer Ariana Grande.

MI5 is subject to scrutiny by a committee of parliament, and it is highly unusual for British authorities to make public that the security service is conducting its own internal investigation into possible lapses.

"The review will look at what was known about Abedi, what decisions were made about the intelligence and what, if anything, could have been done differently," the source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"This is a review that would seek to answer whether there are lessons to be learnt from how the Security Service handled the intelligence on Abedi."

The source told Reuters that Abedi was not among the 3,000 people currently under active investigation by MI5, although he was one of around 20,000 people known to the agency, whose focus is on countering terrorism and espionage.

The BBC said MI5 was alerted at least three times to the "extremist views" of Abedi, a 22-year-old who grew up in Manchester in a family of immigrants from Libya. It was not possible to confirm that report.

"This is an ongoing investigation so I'm not going to be drawn into comments on the actual man who committed this crime," Rudd told BBC television, declining to say what was known about Abedi and when.

LOOMING ELECTION
Last week's attack, the deadliest in Britain since 2005, was claimed by Islamic State. It drew particular revulsion because of the targeting of children - the youngest victim was just eight years old, and nine of the others were teenagers.

On Monday, police made a 16th arrest as part of the case and were undertaking searches at a location in Manchester and a second address north of the city.

Officers also released a close circuit television image of Abedi holding a blue suitcase on the day of the attack and asked members of the public to come forward with information as they focussed on his movements between May 18 and May 22.

"We have no reason to believe the case and its contents contain anything dangerous, but would ask people to be cautious," Detective Chief Superintendent Russ Jackson from the North West Counter Terrorism Unit said in a statement.

RELATED COVERAGE
Britons head to the polls in 10 days' time to elect a new government, with security and police cuts having risen to the top of the political agenda since the bombing last Monday.

Prime Minister Theresa May's Conservatives have seen their poll lead cut in the wake of the attack and after a U-turn over their social care plans for the elderly.

Surveys suggest May - who as a former home secretary oversaw the police and domestic intelligence agency - might not win the landslide predicted just a month ago.

It was not clear whether the authorities became aware of Abedi during May's tenure as home secretary between 2010 and 2016.

British security services have thwarted 18 militant plots in the UK since 2013, including five since an attack in central London in March, when a man mowed down pedestrians in a car and then stabbed a policeman at the entrance to parliament, a source with knowledge of the matter told Reuters last week.
(Additional reporting by Sangameswaran S in Bengaluru; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Alison Williams)
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-security-manchester-mi-idUKKBN18P0MW
 
Who is the "he" you are referring to? The author of the article or user Piotr (who has a proven track record of hating 'England', and doesn't even deny it)?

What you said is not true. I have never said that I hate England (unlike one English member here who said that he hates most Poles and called us bloody leeches). I don't hate England. I've already said that I respect some English People (like Caroline Elkins who wrote a book about English deatch camps in Kenya). I'm against English terrorists like Tony Blair or Theresa May.

Have a nice day.

Al-Saud family is the ideological and financial supporter of ISIS.

Well i have the same feeling. Piotr is right :)
I am not happy of what happened in Manchester, we are just telling the roots of problems and if your corrupt governors leave the oil dollars of AL-Saud family, such incidents will never happen again.
Meanwhile I used to hate the monarchy of England, the same symbol of colonialism. Despite the crimes they have done all over the world, still alive and arming rebels in Syria and Iraq. Their connection to Al-Saud wahabis is an obvious fact from centuries ago.
Take a look a this :
EU and ME will suffer and suffer because of that racist family. UK continuously sells military equipment to that racist ISIS supporter family.
What goes around comes around

England is solely to blame for Manchester attack:

UK foreign policy to blame for Manchester bombing: Analyst

Wed May 24, 2017 12:33PM
Jahangir Mohammad, the director of the Center for Muslims’ Affairs, says the war in Iraq "caused total de-stability" in the region and led to the emergence of the Daesh Takfiri terrorist group.

The instability in Iraq, Mohammad said, "spread to Syria and it is spreading to Libya." The analyst said the status quo in the region was a consequence of "British foreign policy."

In his interview with Press TV, Mohammad also said it was "totally hypocritical now to blame Muslims and to blame Islam for" the recent terrorist attack in Manchester.

Source: http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/05/24/523036/Britain-Manchester-Arena-Muslims

Bear in mind that USA and England founded Daesh. Daesh has nothing to do with Islam and everything to do with USA and England.

God bless you!
Kind regards,
Piotr
 
Last edited:
What you said is not true. I have never said that I hate England (unlike one English member here who said that he hates most Poles and called us bloody leeches). I don't hate England. I've already said that I respect some English People (like Caroline Elkins who wrote a book about English deatch camps in Kenya). I'm against English terrorists like Tony Blair or Theresa May.

Have a nice day.
I don't buy that, judging by your past posts. You've been on and on and on about England but not a word about e.g. Germany (and trust me, they invented death camps way before WW2 in what is now Namibia), or Uncle Joe etc. Not credible.

What goes around, comes around. England is a major state sponsor of terrorism and England is to blame for recent Manchester attack.
So it ok then?
 
Last edited:
I don't buy what you just said. I don't hate England. I'm against English terrorists like Tony Blair and Teresa May.
 
England is solely to blame for Manchester attack:

UK foreign policy to blame for Manchester bombing: Analyst

Wed May 24, 2017 12:33PM
Jahangir Mohammad, the director of the Center for Muslims’ Affairs, says the war in Iraq "caused total de-stability" in the region and led to the emergence of the Daesh Takfiri terrorist group.

The instability in Iraq, Mohammad said, "spread to Syria and it is spreading to Libya." The analyst said the status quo in the region was a consequence of "British foreign policy."

In his interview with Press TV, Mohammad also said it was "totally hypocritical now to blame Muslims and to blame Islam for" the recent terrorist attack in Manchester.

Source: http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2017/05/24/523036/Britain-Manchester-Arena-Muslims
presstv.com

Press TV (stylised PRESSTV) is a 24-hour English language news and documentary network, affiliated with Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_TV
Press TV has been the subject of several controversies. The station has been criticised for its uncritical embrace of provocative stances.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_TV_controversies

So, just because some dude from some center (in Manchester, by the way) says so, it must be so?

Jahangir_Mohammed.jpg


Great analysis :rolleyes1:

https://crescent.icit-digital.org/authors/jahangir-mohammed
Crescent International a monthly newsmagazine associated with The Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought (ICIT), published in Canada. It is the continuation of a local Toronto Pakistani community paper founded in the early 1970s, converted to an international news magazine by Kalim Siddiqui in 1980. ICIT describes itself as "international intellectual center of the global Islamic movement. It consists of individual activists, journalists and academics in all parts of the world who share a common commitment to developing the social and political ideas of the Islamic movement, and promoting them as an alternative worldview to that of Western civilization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Contemporary_Islamic_Thought

https://counterjihadreport.com/2016/02/01/organised-campaign-to-hobble-anti-terror-fight/
Jahangir Mohammed, a Cage activist
CAGE, formerly Cageprisoners Ltd, is a London-based advocacy organisation which aims to "empower communities impacted by the War on Terror" and "highlight and campaign against state policies pertaining to the War on Terror". Critics have called the organisation "apologists for terrorism", a "terrorism advocacy group," and propagators of a "myth of Muslim persecution", while human rights groups say the organisation is doing "vital work".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAGE_(organisation)

Just so you know who'se words you read.
 
Last edited:
presstv.com

Press TV (stylised PRESSTV) is a 24-hour English language news and documentary network, affiliated with Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_TV
Press TV has been the subject of several controversies. The station has been criticised for its uncritical embrace of provocative stances.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_TV_controversies
(....)

Press TV is more credible than BBC (source) and other English fake news media outlets.


Libyans say UK caused Manchester bombing

Date of publication: 29 05 2017, 16:06

Tripoli, Libya. In a rare interview the son of the Lockerbie 747 bomber has warned that Britain faces an unprecedented wave of terror attacks from Libya, as he claimed the UK brought the Manchester attack on itself.

Pan Am Flight 103 was a regularly scheduled Pan Am transatlantic flight from Frankfurt to Detroit via London and New York. On 21 December 1988, the aircraft operating the transatlantic leg of the route, was destroyed by a bomb, killing all 243 passengers and 16 crew, in what became known as the Lockerbie bombing.

In 1999, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi handed over the two men for trial. In 2001, Libyan intelligence officer Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was jailed for life after being found guilty of 270 counts of murder in connection with the bombing. In August 2009, he was released by the Scottish government on compassionate grounds after being diagnosed with prostate cancer. He died in May 2012, the only person to be convicted for the attack.

The son of the bomber Khaled al-Megrahi said his country had become a rich recruiting ground for terrorists and that there was “only a sea” between them and Europe.

The comments came after a week after Salman Abedi, 22, carried out a suicide attack at a pop concert at Manchester Arena, leaving 22 dead and dozens injured.

The son of Libyan parents who were granted refuge from Gaddafi in the UK in the early 1990s, he is thought to have come back to Britain from Libya just days before the massacre.

Speaking from his home in the Libyan capital Tripoli, Mr Megrahi said: “It was Manchester but tomorrow it will be some other place. “The militants will kill each other here and then come to each city in the west. “A lot of Libyans are hungry, have no money and no justice. If the West continues its stance you will see a lot of the militants coming to the UK.” Megrahi forecasted.

Britain joined a coalition of countries bombing Libya in support of the opposition in the wake of the 2011 Arab Spring uprising. A British parliamentary report last year found that the military intervention, ordered by former Prime Minister David Cameron, relied on flawed intelligence and hastened the North African country’s political and economic collapse.

Mr Megrahi urged the West to resume air strikes on the militants to curb the country’s growing extremist networks. “The West knows what’s happening in Libya but they only want to watch and see. You make Libya like this. You will see a lot of terrorists in the UK and everywhere.” Megrahi concluded.
Source: https://en.news-front.info/2017/05/29/libyans-say-uk-caused-manchester-bombing/
 
Prove it if you can. I proved that Press TV is more credible than BBC.
That's going to be slightly problematic: she resides in an urn. Nevertheless, her credibility is undisputedly better than both PressTV and the Beeb. But you're just going to have to take my word for it.

Proof : evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.

Frankly, I find your standards of what constitutes proof rather lacking and minimal.

:yes4:

Press TV is more credible than BBC (source) and other English fake news media outlets.
What exactly was your 'proof' again, that supports this claim?

Have you even showed anything on the same topic from PressTV, the Beeb as well as 'other English fake news media outlets' (< rather an unspecified collection, don't you think)? Let alone an analysis (and evidence) that shows a) differences and b) undisputes, independently underlying facts from which it can be determined one source reports more truth fully and accurate than another?

I didn't think so either.

:smart:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom