the last time Israel killed Iranian soldiers. they issued a descalatory statement saying they didn't know they had targeted Iranians. iran promised a response. shortly after, Iranian forces walked up to the Israeli border, and killed a couple of Israeli troops and walked back. the head of the IRGC openly declared this to be irans "minimum response". Israel took no immediate action.
iran has again promised a response, and will do so again. what part of that can you not comprehend my intelligent Turkish pal.
this is a war where iran is on 2 sides of the Israeli border and taking shots directly into Israel. Israel has never fired a firecracker at Iranian soil. The marmara incident by contrast occurred on a Turkish flagged shipped supposedly In international waters. by legal definition, Israeli troops massacred turks, on Turkish soil and turkey did nothing.
if Israel dares to attack Iranian territory, then there will be a direct, immediate response into tel aviv. but since this was a cowardly shot, taken when irans ally is in a decisive moment in its war, facing the threat of American aggression. if iran takes immediate action, then Israel and the US can use that as an excuse to bomb the saa. and it would appear selfish and complicate Iranian relations with Syria and russsia.
that's why Israeli response will be slightly delayed. but unlike the marmara, we will not hold our breath on it forever. don't worry my Turkish pal.
you support a dictator who has used artillery, airforce, and chemical weapons repeatedly against his own citizens, who were initially and there-after simply and peacefully demonstrating for a bigger share of Syrian national revenue.
it was Assad's tribe's choice to turn Syria into furtile ground for terrorists.
and they tried over and over to scapegoat the peaceful demonstrators and their western backers.
you Iranians have decidedly, and openly on this forum, declared your morals and your true desires.
i've seen comments by Iranian account holders on this forum that spell out things like 'the next holocaust for the Israelis will be a nuclear one'.
that means, Iranians, there's no turning back from me supporting a hard line in negotiations that hold back western military action against Iran.
i've also noted that Iraq is supported to have expressed disapproval for the recent Syrian airstrikes.
that makes me thing twice about allowing Iran and Iraq to cozy up and team up with eachother.
too many (fundamentalist) Muslims will blame the West or any other outside party for your own mistakes anyway, time and time again.
well i'm past the point about caring about your conspiracy-theory filled arguments, fundamentalist Muslims.
it's time for hard lines (not to be crossed) to be set and etched into international law. it's truly the only thing you respect.