BronzePlaque
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 1,902
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Not a good idea...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because one neutron can cause a chain reaction , and this neutron can be anywhere, and alot of more things .... but it can be easier to have one nuke and use it imidiatly but keeping it is hard
Actually it's. Light-water reactors are useless for weapons. You're going to need either enrichment facilities with centrifuges churning out weapon's grade uranium or heavy-water nuclear reactors.Turkish nuclear program is a little bit different from Iranian and Egyptian ones. We can obtain eastern and western technology.
Russia to build Turkeys nuclear plant - FT.com
Energy Tribune- Turkey, Canada Sign Agreement To Build Nuclear Power Plant
First plant will build by Russians, and second one will build by Canadians. Both countries will give Turkey know-how and ToT. Probably, Turkey will be the first country who have eastern and western nuclear plants.
Our program is civilian, not for military uses. But, if you can design a civilian reactor, it is not too difficult to build a nuclear bomb.
Yeah heavy-water is the way to go, but it's easier to build centrifuges underground than to build a heavy-water reactor on the surface where it can be hit (like the Osiraq reactor in Iraq).Actually 95%. But I don't understand why it needs a lot of protection.
It's much easier to use plutonium obtained as a bi-product of nuclear fission than to use HEU for atomic weapons. (Iran's locally-built IR-40 heavy water reactor in Arak produces ~12 kgs of plutonium annually when it is inaugurated).
The question is, why would Turkey and Egypt need nuclear bomb? Please can someone give me some logical reasons?
Well, in the West they are trying to sell two ideas: that Iran is trying to make nukes (false) and that countries surrounding Iran will start their own program if Iran gets the nuke.
Turkey does not have to join the Nuclear arms race, We already have about 80 B61 Nuclear Bombs based at Incirlik base from USA. Able to be carried by 40 Special Modified Turkish F16s. Infact i dont think the US or EU would apriciate such an Action, But something like an domestic nuke would be sweeeeeeet!
I Left out Saudi Arabia for reasons everyone knows they want to buy one from pakistan question is pakistan will be under more fire if they give the saudis one.
Why would Pakistan give or sell a "nuclear bomb" to SA?
Saudis gave funds to their program similar to Saddam Hussein one.
So? If you would have said, Pakistan would support SA nuclear program, i would understand..But you cant just give/sell a nuke to another country..Or am i wrong?
Why would Pakistan give or sell a "nuclear bomb" to SA? We are talking about a nuke here, not a armoured vehicle that you can trade easily
And we've probably helped the North Koreans in many cases when they have ran out of funds.Saudis gave funds to their program similar to Saddam Hussein one.
Its far more realistic then you think bro. For example France has nuclear weapons but they arent from France, They are made in Germany while for some reason Germany does not have any.