BATMAN
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 29,895
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
if our defence Minister was not a charsi. they would have taken Jf17.
When foreign office screw up, defense minister will fail to sell gold.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if our defence Minister was not a charsi. they would have taken Jf17.
Even if we had offered them JF-17 for free, they wouldn't have taken it. Sometimes prestige issues overtake your rational decisions.
When foreign office screw up, defense minister will fail to sell gold.
It's Egyptian money and Egyptian decision
Indeed and interesting, let's see how far they go.Looking at those purchases all I can think is what a logistical nightmare...
Wtf is Egypt doing with all these different types of equipment?!
That requires you to buy a whole lot of everything, in a whole lot of numbers. Common sense says it's not the best way to go. But whatever.It's a national interest and goal of Egypt to diversify its sources of weapons in order to avoid any kind of pressure from any supplier during any probable confrontation in future in which you may need a lot of ammunition and spare parts. Despite being considered as an US-ally, Egypt can't fully depend on them or on any other supplier and their political interests.
PAF can enact DACT with EAF Rafale
I really don't see an enemy of Egypt with-in its neighbors and I don't think Egypt as an enemy of Israel (and vice versa) after 1979.
We should offer them jf-17, al-khalid and etc. If they are on a shoppingspree, we shouldn't judge but make profit.it's Pakistani foreign office, who's is playing it all wrong.
Our FO must learn, interfering in internal affairs of middle eastern states is a diplomatic suicide, i doubt they do it deliberately for sake of Iran.
Indeed and interesting, let's see how far they go.
He is just teasing or ignoring the facts that Egypt has been operating Eastern and Western platforms in all its Military branches for at least 50 years.. with competent manpower on each and every system.. The know-how is huge!@The SC can prove you wrong.
We should offer them jf-17, al-khalid and etc. If they are on a shoppingspree, we shouldn't judge but make profit.
That requires you to buy a whole lot of everything, in a whole lot of numbers. Common sense says it's not the best way to go. But whatever.
Nah man, imma leave that to you, ur flight is booked. Practice ur marketing skills cause PAC sucks at theirs.Go ahead.
I recommend transfer of technology and joint ventures....just sayingDo as much as you can and in gradual steps. Wa a'iddu lahum mastata'tum
Peace isn't protected by force but by the power of the people.Peace is only protected by force and nothing is guaranteed forever. You must be always prepared as if the war is starting on the next day.
Egypt should improve it's economy and local industry to soften the damage of any such action on it's economy or/and it's militaryIt's a national interest and goal of Egypt to diversify its sources of weapons in order to avoid any kind of pressure from any supplier during any probable confrontation in future in which you may need a lot of ammunition and spare parts. Despite being considered as an US-ally, Egypt can't fully depend on them or on any other supplier and their political interests.
I agree but have you noticed the trend of acquiring weapons from different suppliers ? Secondly, Egypt's economy has been stronger than Pakistan's, and an enemy (Israel) same as Pakistan's, but the enemy was turned into a friend (1979), and the enemy possesses nuclear weapons, so as per your statement, has Egypt acquired nuclear weapons to be prepared for war the next day since nothing is guaranteed? If yes, excellent, if not , why not ?Peace is only protected by force and nothing is guaranteed forever. You must be always prepared as if the war is starting on the next day.