Frogman
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 16, 2013
- Messages
- 2,751
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
1. That's funny, you keep telling us justice needs to be served and that officials are responsible for clashes on the ground between supporters of each side. So since you're so just. Hold the other side accountable as well. And the magnitude does matter, we don't know if those killed were deliberately killed on June 30th and which sides they were from. You gave us a military link to the deaths. When 600 protesters were killed in one day deliberately then you should hold them accountable. Instead of pointing fingers at a previous date and making a retarded argument. Or is your justification that the masses somehow approve of mass murder so nothing should be done? How stupid that does that? So the vast majority of Egyptians are monsters?
I still have no idea why you are attacking me or think I somehow represent the current regime. Again, read the last paragraph of post #3804 or any other post. The argument I'm trying to get across is that there are no 'good' sides in Egypt just as there are no 'victims' (talking about leaderships and organizations not individuals). I still don't know why you can't understand my views.
Provide evidence paid 'thugs' were used and don't give me a military source.
I'm sorry if you don't know about the 'baltagiya' and how the central security forces use them. This has been going on for years. A quick Google search will come up with some answers.
This is a report from the 2011 revolution:
Thugs-for-Hire Leave Mark on Protests, Egyptians Say - WSJ.com
Proof? Everybody was reporting about the sudden change just 24 hours later.
We are communicating from across the Atlantic ocean in a matter of seconds (if not less). With the worlds press on the ground and every one looking in it would be surprising if no one noticed what happened especially when a regime is about to come down. It fell way before the military even intervened. The series of ministerial resignations before the 3rd of July sealed the governments fate (as did Morsi's speech).
And the gulf countries were anti MB and started shipping oil as soon as the coup started.
So Egypt was in need of fuel. Because you mentioned previously that fuel was withheld internally by the military to ferment revolution but this in itself proves otherwise. Conspiracy or not weak leadership and management can't be excused.
Where am I insulting Egyptians? Do you have problems with reading comprehension? I clearly stated that these things could have been avoided but military pushed for it to pressure the MB over time.
I know your argument very well. You start by admitting the MB government did make minor mistakes but they should be excused of those mistakes because the military and the 'deep state' worked against them because they wanted the 'seculars', 'liberals', and 'Copts' to rule. Then I ask you if there's proof of this and you don't answer but when I make an accusation you demand proof and tell me not to cite 'military sources'. So its my turn, provide evidence of the military or the deep state withholding supplies and fuel which aren't from 'MB sources'. While you're at it provide proof that the coup was done in coordination with foreign nations.
Didn't say otherwise.So? They were voted in by the people.
Liberals got 30% of the seats? MB had 47% and the Nour party had about 30% and they have different ideas then the MB and are even against them as we seen in the coup.
They were in an informal coalition when the house was first elected then the Nour party were alienated by the MB which eventually led to them parting ways a few months after. A number of factors lead to that, including the normalization of ties with Iran.
How so did they not have any influence? I'm not doing your work for you back your statements up.
They couldn't influence legislation within the lower house because they had a tiny number of seats compared with the Islamist block and the Democratic Alliance of Egypt. So without they ability to reject legislation or pass it then how could they influence it? street protests to pressure the executive or legislature to listen.
When the lower house was disbanded most of the powers were transferred to the elected president and then the amount of influence they had was cut further as they could only put pressure through street protests.
Why are you telling me I shouldn't back them up? They have a large history.
Because they are traitors, just like the military brass and the previous regimes remnants. They may have not betrayed the nation but they betrayed the revolution. Their history means nothing to me.
Of course I recognized mistakes they made in the past couple years but not all blame lies on them.
They were the government, that's what happens. Mistakes isn't what got them overthrown.
As I've said, minority secularists and liberals wanted too much influence of their own which was unrealistic.
So, what?
And I'm not backing them up just because I agree with them ideologically.
Then why.
On the contrary, you're doing so, whatever the coptic church says you roll with it.
You think I'm a Copt?
You think I would allow religion to have a say in my life or views
You are no better than a Copt who listens to his Church, after all you would do the same if your beloved Imam told you to support something or not.