What's new

ECP finds PTI guilty of accepting prohibited funds

Another strike on PTI. Unable to provide 13 account information. Show cause notice issue to PTI by ECP.

The foreign funding allegation is dropped.

The example of foreign funding, JUIF received funds directly from Gaddafi/Libyan govt.


The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday ruled that PTI did indeed receive prohibited funding and issued a show-cause notice to the party.

The commission announced the verdict in a case filed by PTI founding member Akbar S. Babar which had been pending since November 14, 2014. The verdict, which was reserved on June 21, was expected at 10am but was delayed by almost half-an-hour.

On Tuesday, the three-member ECP bench comprising Chief Election Commissioner Sikander Sultan Raja also ruled that the party received funds from business tycoon Arif Naqvi and from 34 foreign nationals. It said that the party had taken ownership of eight accounts and kept 13 hidden.

The ECP decided to issue a show-cause notice to the PTI to explain why the commission should not seize the funds it received. The commission also said that PTI chief Imran Khan had submitted a “misdeclaration” with the commission.

The security in Islamabad’s ‘red zone’ was put on high alert ahead of the ECP’s verdict. It has been decided to deploy 1,000 police personnel in the area, and the anti-riot force will also remain in the red zone. Unrelated persons will not be able to enter the Red zone.

As time for the verdict drew closer, footage broadcast on television showed Islamabad police with riot shields standing outside the building as staffers can be seen unrolling spools of concertina wire.
Simple Answer People of Pakistan want to see Imran Khan in Power BUT Corruption Criminals Mafia (PPP & Pmln) & international Mafia don't want to see Imran Khan in Power...
 
Was thinking the same thing. I mean with such a massive defence budget and stakes so high for Pakistan, we are relying on people who Okay'd, if not actually produced, this joke of a report? Is this also the quality of dossiers we keep producing against India? No wonder no one gives a damn about them.
One thing Shabazz sharif said that was actually true, it was buried in ridicule.
Beggars are not choosers. In essense sharifs and zardaris made Pakistan beggar, so No one listen to our side of story. GHQ manipulate and don't have support from political parties and everything produced in their factory lacks bigger picture, just self interest.
 
Im at the point where i welcome a default. I believe that is the only way enough anger boils over, and awam takes justice in its own hands and much needed change occurs
 
PDM goons having a field day... what will the nation do? will they come out and take these goons to gallows? or they are still shameless and want to be plundered?
 
E.C.PML_N message to PTI is simple bringing Money into Pakistan Wrong! Stealing Money from Pakistan and investing overseas HALAL!!! :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
ECP are a damn disgrace who can't tell what a transaction is like Visa or mastercard bunch of clowns.
 
Good so from 40000 they find 13 un announced ?
actual nr is 1404,, -----not 40.000..

if u do some research, u will find, instead to listining to immi de dim,, bla-bla bla

Loooool. It's prohibited funding case not foreign funding case.
pti, gave application . to change its name from foreign funding to /prohibited funding..

cas foregn funding did go so good with foriegn SAZISH of amerika..
 
Hearsay

actual nr is 1404,, -----not 40.000..

if u do some research, u will find, instead to listining to immi de dim,, bla-bla bla


pti, gave application . to change its name from foreign funding to /prohibited funding..

cas foregn funding did go so good with foriegn SAZISH of amerika..
Foreign funding: Funding by foreign governments to topple government.

Prohibited funding: Funding by foreign nationals/ companies.

The list of the donors has been provided by PTI itself for the scrutiny.
 
According to Law half of the money in that account, only Nasir could not take out money from that account, Romita Shetty has to give consent for funding. So according to law half of the money attributed to Shetty.



The law says so.

Please show the 'law' where it says so.

Or are you going to cite a foreign law which you know nothing about just like the ECP and cite a link? :P

Waisay PTI walay bhi syanay hain....they took foreign funding and then themselves gave the exact details of it to the ECP themselves!
 
According to Law half of the money in that account, only Nasir could not take out money from that account, Romita Shetty has to give consent for funding. So according to law half of the money attributed to Shetty.



The law says so.

Which law do you speak of?
There are 2 types of joint account.

1) Anyone to sign - any party that is joint on the account can do whatever they want. Withdraw everything in the account and no one can stop them. Bank doesn’t care who the money belongs to, all they care is the person withdrawing is on the account.

2) Both to sign or more than 2 to sign -
Still a joint account but any type of withdrawal will require both parties to be present in the branch.

If account has more than 2 people on the account , account holders can put restrictions on how many people need to sign to withdraw.

A simple google search will solve this issue for you, but google can be a PTI supporter so be careful.
 
Back
Top Bottom