Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually it is AMCA program, AMCA program will develop fighter for both Air Force and Navy. So there will be no Tejas for Navy. If they develop different design from AMCA, it doesnt make any sense and indeed a dumb decision, unless you have aircraft carrier as many as US.
Navy usually did not like single engine fighters with limited range. The reason why Navy was reluctant despite government push was Tejas was single engine and have less range in comparison to the MiG 29Ks.IMO, it isn't a bad fighter for aircraft carriers because its an LCA compared to F-18, Mig-29K, Su-33, etc. If I had an navy with an aircraft carrier that needed aircraft on it I would choose the Tejas.
It would work for naval operations, just trust me. The load would be reduced but it would work just fine.
To admit I don't know how real and authoritative this design is but IMO this looks very much like an attempt to start with a MiG-29, mate it with new wings and tails and hope the best ...
It's a old AMCA design, not the new twin engine naval design. You can expect a model at aero India.
So no more delta wing madness and i see LERX... good to see they see value in design elements of jF-17.
There wont be any LERX, it will be canards. and JF 17 is no naval fighter, the overall purpose of naval design is different when it comes to fighting at seal level and at sea.
Why bringing JF-17 into an Indian naval fighter issue?