Capt.Popeye
ELITE MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 11,937
- Reaction score
- 12
Discuss about the idea guys
In just one word: NO !
In the conflicts that can be imagined; the Strategic Bomber is an useless weapon, unless we decide to declare war on Finland or Iceland.
The ICBM fleet is good enough for whatever can be anticipated. And as somebody here mentioned: if at all one were to think about beefing up Long Range nuclear delivery capability; then SSBNs are better platforms.
So 'NO' to Strategic Bombers; very little utility for the investment.