Sashan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 4,289
- Reaction score
- 1
I cannot see what the fuss is all about.
To me its simple, those living in SL are Sri Lankans first , always and every time. I am against dividing nations on ethnic grounds. The whole fiasco the Tamils did in SL was to me simply a game of trying to carve a nation for themselves. I am glad it has not worked out.
Hard decisions need to be taken to solve complex and festering problems. The sooner all parties move on the better.
It is not as simple as it sounds. My simple response post #3 and it would settle many of the issues but I don't see the divulsion of powers coming. SL can do very well to learn from India who has the divulsion of powers granted to individual states and that is how different language people are able to live together. SL has just 3 different people if I go by what Skyline states here(Sinhalese, Tamils and Moors) whereas India have hundreds of divergent people, language, culture, religion.
For more complex background the history goes back almost 2000 years of tamil-sinhalese rivalry.
For more simpler background, I have a few pointers I can point you to the history of how the separate country discussions gained ground. It was India who started this by promoting the fringe militant organizations. I would suggest reading how India has blood in its hands by turning a non-violent movement into a violent movement. SL Tamil movement was pre-dominantly non-violent movement since SL independence. There were some isolated militants like Prabhakaran who were not that powerful enough to take on even the policemen. Indira decided to turn that to India's advantage by promoting a psuedo-marxist like Prabhakaran who turned against all the other non-militant and militant leaders and the SL tamil movement effectively became a violent movement.