no he didnt
maybe didnt see the need anymore. Indian establishment has been dictating Indian foreign policy regarding its neighbors for a long time and has sabotaged the Pak Indian peace initiatives many times now the cat is out the bag showing the real power behind the current Indian democracy RSS politicians, RSS spies and RSS generals.
RSS country
Indian army has been dictating the policy for a long time.
Dear Sir, you are completely off track. The truth is that Gen. Rawat is being used as a mouthpiece by the government, that has its own way of doing things, quite different from what was the pattern earlier.
The Indian Army has NEVER dictated policy, except as far as the colloquium between the J&K State Government, that is, the politicians in office at that moment, the State bureaucracy, the State Governor, and the Indian Army itself is concerned. In that, the GOC-in-C XVI Corps usually has a voice, but he says nothing without checking with the Chief. The Chief, in turn, says nothing without warning the RM (the Defence Minister) what he is thinking, and what he believes is the general feeling in decision-making circles in the Army. A word from the RM, and that line of thinking vanishes. When it appears as a public statement, it means that it has been permitted, even encouraged.
No question of spontaneity.
Your model of the RSS as calling the shots from behind is completely mistaken. It is not yet true; it is hoped that it will never become true.
This is 2018, soon 2019. You're nitpicking from the past. Get with the times. Either declare that you're "democratic" or admit to the reality. We didn't claim we were a democracy back then so your statements don't matter.
Every democracy has changes in ruling party, and that leads to a certain amount of change and re-orientation in policy, doctrine and public stance. So if you will kindly calm down, this kind of transience is always present; even for a committed opponent of the BJP such as I, the need for periodic re-examination of everything from the ground it is necessary to subject all our habitual attitudes, stances and actions to unrelenting scrutiny, even hostile scrutiny.
As for the remark you have answered, there is whataboutery on both sides; it is disingenuous to be so vastly surprised when it is found with an Indian member.
