Defence Secretary Mattis calls COAS. Commends Pakistan

[wiseone2]

given that it was only a 20 minute conversation intiated by "mad dog" shows that General Qamar must've given him a very cold shoulder. Kinda like this:
Gen. Qamar: Hello
mad dog: Hello Gen. Qamar, general mattis here.
Gen. Qamar: Yes?
mad dog: well i'm retired but your still active. haha.
Gen. Qamar: Okay.
mad dog: so how ya doin' ol' buddy ol' pal.
Gen. Qamar: Great.
mad dog: I would like to commend you on the great achievement against terrorism.
Gen. Qamar: Thx.
mad dog: yes we hold your zeal in very high regards.
Gen. Qamar: That's nice.
mad dog: so when can we sit down and discuss future strategy.
Gen. Qamar: Don't know.
mad dog: how about we invite you over next month?
Gen. Qamar: No, I'm busy.
mad dog: how about i fly over then?
Gen. Qamar: No, I'm busy.
mad dog: umm
Gen. Qamar:
mad dog: ok so
Gen. Qamar:
mad dog: ok well nice talking to you.
Gen. Qamar: Same here.
mad dog: ok so
Gen. Qamar: k bye
mad dog: bye.

I should be skit writer!

Uncle Sam is the only one who can feed you when there is a famine

 

[GumNaam]

Uncle Sam is the only one who can feed you when there is a famine

Naaah, we'll just slap you around and take your food like (as per your bjp jokers) our forefathers did.

 

[Hollow Field]

but that's not the first worthless thing to come from India. Remember the thing called Pakistan.
Now shoo.

The Indian subcontinent, for the most part, was under Islamic rule since at least 1206 starting with the Delhi Sultanate. This Islamic rule ended when the British arrived.

Notwithstanding Southern India, who have largely remained independent of Muslim rulers, what were North Indian Hindus doing? Why did they submit to Islamic rule for >800 years. If the British had not invaded, India would still be ruled by Muslims.

Now, it is the age of democracy, it's only fair, that India be ruled by Hindus, but don't forget the benevolence of Muslims who gave Hindustan prosperity and culture for nearly a millenium. Otherwise, they had 800 years to exterminate Hindus

 

[somebozo]

PAKISTAN didn't come out of india, PAKISTAN was created after breaking the worthless india!

We are currently absorbing all the Afghan problems so India can have peace and stability..think about that...we do not want to end up becoming a buffer state..if Indians was "brotherly" releations with Afghanistan, we may as well give all Afghans a corridor to their former empire seat in New Delhi.

 

[TMA]

but that's not the first worthless thing to come from India. Remember the thing called Pakistan.
Now shoo.

British India was divided into two main blocks: Pakistan and Bharat. Remember that Pakistan is the Land of the Indus or in Persian "Hindustan".

 

[wiseone2]

Naaah, we'll just slap you around and take your food like (as per your bjp jokers) our forefathers did.

good luck with that. you had a hard time keeping a few desolate mountain peaks 17 years ago.

 

[GumNaam]

good luck with that. you had a hard time keeping a few desolate mountain peaks 17 years ago.

we still have the king peak!

 

[wiseone2]

The Indian subcontinent, for the most part, was under Islamic rule since at least 1206 starting with the Delhi Sultanate. This Islamic rule ended when the British arrived.

Notwithstanding Southern India, who have largely remained independent of Muslim rulers, what were North Indian Hindus doing? Why did they submit to Islamic rule for >800 years. If the British had not invaded, India would still be ruled by Muslims.

Now, it is the age of democracy, it's only fair, that India be ruled by Hindus, but don't forget the benevolence of Muslims who gave Hindustan prosperity and culture for nearly a millenium. Otherwise, they had 800 years to exterminate Hindus

Let us check our math and facts. Delhi Sultanate began in 1192. Muslim dominance over Northern India ended by 1720. Marathas were the dominant power in Northern India. The British did not conquer Bengal until 1757.

we still have the king peak!

what happened to the rest of them ??

 

[GumNaam]

Let us check our math and facts. Delhi Sultanate began in 1192. Muslim dominance over Northern India ended by 1720. Marathas were the dominant power in Northern India. The British did not conquer Bengal until 1757.



what happened to the rest of them ??

You got slaughtered while taking all mini peaks and finally gave up on the main peak!

 

[wiseone2]

You got slaughtered while taking all mini peaks and finally gave up on the main peak!

why run to Clinton if you are winning ?

 

[GumNaam]

why run tt455o Clinton if you are winning ?

ask clinton. My intention was to b!tch slap you around that we got the peak we wanted and you gave up after 30,000 dead troops!

 

[wiseone2]

Ask clinton. My intention was to b!tch slap you around that we got the peak we wanted and you gave up after 30,000 dead troops!

keep drinking and inhaling the strong stuff you are having

 

[GumNaam]

keep drinking and inhaling the strong stuff you are having

Its called water and air. tell your starving soldiers to try drinking water and inhaling air instead of drinking alcohol and inhaling that afghan hash!

 

[Tiger Genie]

The Indian subcontinent, for the most part, was under Islamic rule since at least 1206 starting with the Delhi Sultanate. This Islamic rule ended when the British arrived.

Notwithstanding Southern India, who have largely remained independent of Muslim rulers, what were North Indian Hindus doing? Why did they submit to Islamic rule for >800 years. If the British had not invaded, India would still be ruled by Muslims.

Now, it is the age of democracy, it's only fair, that India be ruled by Hindus, but don't forget the benevolence of Muslims who gave Hindustan prosperity and culture for nearly a millenium. Otherwise, they had 800 years to exterminate Hindus

muslims 'tried' to impose their version of religion and culture and couldn't over 800 years because the better religion and culture that already existed in India prevailed for obvious reasons. when they tried force, they did manage to convert a minority which unfortunately is still suffering from having lost their original culture. Just look at the people of Pakistan struggling for identity, running from arabs, to mongols of uzbeks to what not begging fro acceptance to be only rejected by them all. this is why in spite of the horrendous behavior of Pakistan, I feel sympathy rather than hatred towards them. Their ancestry, culture all taken away and they have but no choice to call what they were forced into.

 

[salarsikander]

muslims 'tried' to impose their version of religion and culture and couldn't over 800 years because the better religion and culture that already existed in India prevailed for obvious reasons. when they tried force, they did manage to convert a minority which unfortunately is still suffering from having lost their original culture. Just look at the people of Pakistan struggling for identity, running from arabs, to mongols of uzbeks to what not begging fro acceptance to be only rejected by them all. this is why in spite of the horrendous behavior of Pakistan, I feel sympathy rather than hatred towards them. Their ancestry, culture all taken away and they have but no choice to call what they were forced into.

And yet here you're in in America calling yourself err what indiN or American or both. Bloody confused hypocrite