halloweene
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
- Messages
- 466
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
The last time i spoke to a Dassault executive, they seemed very commited. But the process of ToT is very complex to set up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The last time i spoke to a Dassault executive, they seemed very commited. But the process of ToT is very complex to set up.
Each of the countries are smart enough to know what suits them best. There is nothing which may indicate an inferiority or superiority. Nobody should forget that all of them are machines and are under the control of a human being and brain.. So its the concept of best skill set which will prove the superiority. The country which invests in proper training, mock tests and big exercises would be better prepared then who does not. Hence the fanboys claim of any aircraft being superior or inferior is utter gibberish..
They should be, not only because they lost Brazil and the UAE are milking France badly, but because of the advantages it would give French industry to get additional fundings for upgrades, reduced costs for the production of parts and the unit costs for the fighter and French weapons. The problem is only, that this commitment came very late only in the Indian tender, compared to what we could see in Brazil, or even how far you are ready to compromise with the UAE an matters not related with the Rafale.
Btw, you had a report about the Rafaut multi pylon for C130s on your (if I'm not wrong) website, which also are producing the pylons for Rafale. Is it safe to assume that any stealth weapon pod that Rafale might get in future, will be developed by them?
Sorry Parik but that contains a huge error, check here :That is why Brazil choose Saab, UAE chose Euro Typhon, Pakistan choose JF 17. Each of the countries are smart enough to know what suits them best.
I find it strange how so many folks confuse Dassault with Rafale international at best and the French govt at worse. Right before that remark, he mentioned HMS, IRST, EW and missiles, none of which are Dassault products! So faulting Dassault in the same post is squarely illogical? Especially since real co-development on the plane itself is ridiculous as, again and again sorry to be blunt, the people that made LCA are not up to the task of making a Rafale 2.0, period.I guess we are too distracted by LCA and FGFA, while the French side (mainly Dassault) is not eager to see India as a real partner.
I dont know. The only thing i know is that such a stealth weapon pod was designed for Korean tender in 2002 i think
Not my blog btw, i simply write some articles in. Did you like the one on stealth and radars?
I find it strange how so many folks confuse Dassault with Rafale international at best and the French govt at worse. Right before that remark, he mentioned HMS, IRST, EW and missiles, none of which are Dassault products! So faulting Dassault in the same post is squarely illogical?