Abingdonboy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 29,597
- Reaction score
- 46
- Country
- Location
This is also bad in the sense that PAF has favourable relations with TAF and often conducts F-16 ex with each other.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
your Failed Pakfa Superior to American Stealth?.. fanboysIt' also question the real effactivnenes of Stealth Plane. Thant's why in terms of Aerodynamic Our PAKFA design is much much better then F-35.
your Failed Pakfa Superior to American Stealth?.. fanboys
J-20 its lightyears ahead of your so called PakFa...
your Failed Pakfa Superior to American Stealth?.. fanboys
J-20 its lightyears ahead of your so called PakFa...
your Failed Pakfa Superior to American Stealth?.. fanboys
J-20 its lightyears ahead of your so called PakFa...
Whos the fanboy here? Care to back up your statement with some real facts? And I cant see how the J-20 can be "lightyears" ahead of the PAK FA when 40% of its components are from Russia. And it is a well known fact that Russia does not give China access to its latest technologies fearing reverse engineering.
Now can we all please come back to the topic at hand???
that´s what Indian trolls doDoes making things up make you feel better, my friend?
Does making things up make you feel better, my friend?
Watch the following video from 0:55 to 1:20
There's your source. The official in the video goes on to say that the J-20 is more comparable to MiG 1.44 and Su-47 5th generation technology demonstrators (which he himself says is not truly 5th generation) than American and Russian 5th generation aircraft.
Nice reliable source. You fail to hide your envy
Sigh....
Honestly.. J-20 is not the real 5th gen fighter that China is developing.. it is 4.99 gen... i guess there is a cooking inside china where the real stealth and more agile one will come out.. i dont think whit that huge enormous body of the size of the flanker and with canards to support the body it will be in the area of VLO... but surely in the area of LO...
No way with Canards you can achieve VLO... Mig1.44 or su-47 with which people are comparing was never in the area of VLO.. but yes in the area of LO because of the shaping...
So you are an expert of canards... ? I bet you know more than the entire CAC expert group, right?
Listen, kid, no one knows much about this project unless you have top level clearance. The speculation is purely from the pictures. The mig 1.44 comparison is just laughable because part from similar configuration, the 2 has absolutely nothing in common. The J-20 uses side and dsi intake, integrated body, chiseled head, integrated canopy... a long list of technologies the mig 1.44 can only dream about.
Here is a much more reliable source report, from a think tank in Washington DC. This is way more reliable than some paranoid Russians who desperately try to sell their half baked, over hyped T-50.
The Jamestown Foundation: An Initial Assessment of China's J-20 Stealth Fighter