Gotta ask the DM, he seems to be enjoying the attention he is getting from the media and foreign OEMs on this matter and thus is juggling all the various offers with no real foreward movement other than some remarks about intent every now and then. The fact of the matter is he inhereited an IAF that is facing a fighter crisis and he has still not done anything to address it but is still content claim he is doing the best for the nation.
The Rafale deal will be signed but when is the big question, Parrikar doesn't seem to know it himself. Maybe a few high profile fighter losses will force his hand as he only seems to really act when poltical compulsions dictate it.
@PARIKRAMA do you get the sense that Parrikar is out of his depth or that he is simply a very shrewd politcan that is trying to play all sides? From the outside there seems to be very little consistency with him and there is a distinct disconnect between what he says and what he later decides to do. A few examples:
- Emphasising the need to allow the private sector into defence but selects the Ka-226 to be made by HAL (a decsion made all the more bizzare by the fact that HAL is in the advanced stages of developing their own LUH). Incidentally, as I had predicted, the Ka-226 deal is STILL not signed.
- Emphasising the need to meet the needs of the Forces but then greenlighting the development of the HTT-40 and scrapping the 125 follow-on unit deal of PC-7s to be made in India. This decsion will ensure the IAF doesn't receive any new BTTs for another 5 years (at least) AND will be burdened by having two types for the SAME ROLE. Again, contradictory with his emphasis on making cost savings by creating efficencies.
- Linked to above but with fighters, after the PM personally ensured the Rafale G-G deal was pursued he has failed to see its completion at the earliest despite the PM's remarks that these fighters were for the urgent need of the IAF.
- Emphasising the need for self-reliance and yet seemingly opening the door to LCA-killers Gripen and F-16 to be made in India? Further contradicted by the credit he seems to want for the MK1A's development.
- Saying (in late 2014 IIRC) that blanket blacklisting was counter-productive and only hurt India's defence prepardness but now blacklisting the Finmeccanica and all of its (extensive) subsidaries that India's military has multiple critical deals with (127mm guns for the P-17As and P-15Bs, QR-SAM, Black Shark torpedos- effectively leaving the $500m/boat Scorpenes of the IN toothless, RAN-40L VSR for the IAC-1 ensuring it's induction will be delayed by years etc etc). This whilst there is still not a SINGLE person who has been arrested and no actual wrongdoing proven. A further contradiction is the fact that he is delaying the Rafale deal on the pretext of securing the "best deal for India" (ie saving a few rupees) but this decsion will end up costing India hundreds of millions of USD as the Scorpenes are already hardwired for the Black Sharks, the IAC-1 has been built around the RAN-40L and the delays this blacklisting will cause to numerous CRITICAL defence projects will be horrific.
- Emphasising the needs for more "jointness" amongst the forces and still sat on the CDS and the three new tri-service commands (Space,Cyber and Special Ops).
There's no consistency at all with his decsion making. He is easily one of the worst performers in the Modi cabinet.
Parrikar seems to be a mix of Swamy and AK Anthony- indecisive, a loudmouth and overly concious of political considerations.
@JanjaWeed @ranjeet @Levina @Parul @Star Wars @noksss @Taygibay