What's new

Dassault Rafale, tender | News & Discussions [Thread 2]

+++
Poisoning of mind in full swing+++ By our fav Bharat Karnad.... In Indian Express...
++++

Taking Off | The Indian Express

For an indigenous light combat aircraft (LCA) disparaged by the Indian Air Force brass as “overweight”, “underpowered”, “obsolete”, “a three-legged cheetah” and, in technical terms, as a plane that “cannot fly without telemetry, pull more than 6G or an angle-of-attack (AoA) greater than 20 degrees” and “with an air intake that starves the engine”, is supposedly afflicted with “53 identified shortfalls”, and fails to meet the “minimum air staff requirements (ASRs)”, the Tejas, entirely unreported by the Indian media, performed phenomenally well at the recent Bahrain International Air Show. It has silenced the naysayers. The minimum that this success ought to do is get the government to reconsider the deal with France, because the fact is Tejas’ future will be inversely affected by the Rafale deal. If one is up, the other is out.

The LCA’s composites-built airframe and small size enhance its stealth features, translating into a small radar signature and the greatest difficulty for enemy aircraft to detect it. Bahrain proved that fighting quality. There can be no complaints.

Price-wise, India is willing to pay only $7 billion, France expects $11 bn. To put these figures in perspective, the Rafale programme was originally pegged at $10 bn for 126 aircraft, including transfer of technology (ToT). So how come, after reducing the demand for Rafales by two-thirds and deducting 18 per cent of the cost as value of ToT, the new price tag exceeds the original cost by a billion dollars? Worse, Paris is disinclined to offer sovereign guarantee regarding the delivery timeline and spares supply but is prepared to provide a letter from President Francois Hollande, which is worth nothing. Yet, the defence ministry is reconciled to forking out Rs 63,000 crore for 36 Rafales. This works out to Rs 1,750 crore or nearly $270 million per aircraft — a sum that could fetch three Tejas or two Sukhoi-30 MKIs, rated the best combat aircraft in the world.

Tejas, a 4.5 generation aircraft like Rafale, has always been underfunded by government and undermined by the IAF with periodic rewriting of ASRs. Three years ago, for instance, a mid-air refuelling probe was included, necessitating aircraft redesign that cost time, money and delays in the certification and induction cycles.

Scarcity of money is the real problem and requires making hard choices. Should the Indian government commit Rs. 63,000 crore to the Tejas and Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programmes rather than sustaining the French aviation industry, it will signal serious intent, bring the streamlined Defence Production Policy-2016 guidelines into play, permitting the DRDO to transfer source codes and flight control laws to Indian private-sector companies, incentivise small- and medium-scale technology innovation companies comprising an Indian mittelstand to take root, motivate foreign suppliers of components and assemblies that currently comprise 70 per cent of Tejas to manufacture these in India and, conjoined to a policy pushing its export, germinate a viable, comprehensively capable, aerospace sector-led Indian defence industrial growth. This infusion of funds will fast-track the synergistic development of follow-on versions of Tejas, its navalised variant, along with the AMCA, and the fifth generation fighter project in partnership with Russia. It will be the cutting-edge of a “Made in India” policy showcasing indigenous capability.

With Rafale facing production problems — only eight aircraft were outputted in 2014 — all the contracted Rafales won’t be in IAF service before 2030. It is not the answer to India’s immediate need. A more economical solution that will also satisfy the IAF’s apparent craving for French aircraft is to procure the 30-plus upgraded Mirage 2000-9s the United Arab Emirates want to be rid of, and a third Mirage squadron (with 80 per cent of its life intact) available from Qatar. Infrastructure already exists to service and operate the Mirages. It will not complicate the logistics nightmare created by the diversity of combat aircraft in the IAF’s inventory, which Rafale’s entry will do.


++
@Abingdonboy @randomradio @Vauban @Picdelamirand-oil
See previous posts, i said our smart and supremely intelligent analysts and writers would divide whole price by 36..

the defence ministry is reconciled to forking out Rs 63,000 crore for 36 Rafales. This works out to Rs 1,750 crore or nearly $270 million per aircraft

This is despite all sources indicating less than Rs 60,000 Crs and closer to 56K crs.

So many factual errors and still people will hail it as gospel truth...
 
. . .
I doubt Rafale,whether 36 or 189 will make any difference in an air war with either PAF or PLAAF or both.
IAF has unquestionable superiority over PAF anyways and Rafale will not save IAF from being routed if PLAAF decides bring its might on IAF.
The kind of scenario IAF envisages Rafale being useful-doing ground attack over Pakistan and Tibet using low level flying to remain undetected will result in nuclear exchange ultimatly and is hence very improbable.
India should aim to maintain minimum conventional deterrance and use nuclear blackmailing with china and aim to outspend pakistan in covert warfare while maintaining the coventional superiority it currently enjoys.
Rafale wont make a telling difference in either scenario to justify handing over shiploads of hard earned money to the French making the rich even richer.
I agree with Karnad to dump Rafale and choose Tejas but that wont happen because Rafale is being forced upon India by France due to thier geopolitical alliance.India has wisely chosen to buy the minimal viable number of Rafale to mollify France and will only buy more if economics make sense.
 
. .

Attachments

  • IHS Jane's Jet Operating Costs White Paper FINAL 13th March 2012(1).pdf
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
.
I doubt Rafale,whether 36 or 189 will make any difference in an air war with either PAF or PLAAF or both.
IAF has unquestionable superiority over PAF anyways and Rafale will not save IAF from being routed if PLAAF decides bring its might on IAF.
The kind of scenario IAF envisages Rafale being useful-doing ground attack over Pakistan and Tibet using low level flying to remain undetected will result in nuclear exchange ultimatly and is hence very improbable.
India should aim to maintain minimum conventional deterrance and use nuclear blackmailing with china and aim to outspend pakistan in covert warfare while maintaining the coventional superiority it currently enjoys.
Rafale wont make a telling difference in either scenario to justify handing over shiploads of hard earned money to the French making the rich even richer.
I agree with Karnad to dump Rafale and choose Tejas but that wont happen because Rafale is being forced upon India by France due to thier geopolitical alliance.India has wisely chosen to buy the minimal viable number of Rafale to mollify France and will only buy more if economics make sense.

Nukes are overrated in the Indo-Pak scenario.

And in the Sino-India scenario, nukes are the last resort. At best it will be a border war, even if it is long. The bigger threat is China's PLARF with conventional missiles.

The French are not forcing India to do anything. Read the last 4 pages.
 
.
Nukes are overrated in the Indo-Pak scenario.

And in the Sino-India scenario, nukes are the last resort. At best it will be a border war, even if it is long. The bigger threat is China's PLARF with conventional missiles.

The French are not forcing India to do anything. Read the last 4 pages.
Last 4 pages of an internet forum are not proof of anything though I agree I should have qualified in my post that it was based on conjecture on my part.I thought that was understood.
Cheers.

Edit About the nukes being over rated in Indo-pak or even Indo-china theatre I vehemently disagree.
IMO nukes are the only weapons standing between Madras regiment aka Thambi as I learnt here and punjabi pussy./jk
 
Last edited:
.
+++
Poisoning of mind in full swing+++ By our fav Bharat Karnad.... In Indian Express...
++++



With Rafale facing production problems — only eight aircraft were outputted in 2014 — all the contracted Rafales won’t be in IAF service before 2030.

++
@Abingdonboy @randomradio @Vauban @Picdelamirand-oil
See previous posts, i said our smart and supremely intelligent analysts and writers would divide whole price by 36..

the defence ministry is reconciled to forking out Rs 63,000 crore for 36 Rafales. This works out to Rs 1,750 crore or nearly $270 million per aircraft

This is despite all sources indicating less than Rs 60,000 Crs and closer to 56K crs.

So many factual errors and still people will hail it as gospel truth...
Rafale facing production problems!
The production has been normal in 2014 with delivery of 11 Rafale, and 2015 with production of 11 Rafale and delvery of 5 Rafale to France, 3 Rafale to Egypt. The 3 remaining were delivered in January 2016 to Egypt, the delay was due to adaptation of configuration to egyptian needs. So in 2016 we will produce 11 Rafale and deliver 14.
 
.
You can google
Enhanced Aircraft Platform Availability
Through Advanced Maintenance
Concepts and Technologies

And look page 3-11 paragraph 3.2.4.2

Thanks a ton

upload_2016-2-15_16-26-10.png


upload_2016-2-15_16-27-9.png

upload_2016-2-15_16-27-32.png


Sorry bro no idea...but he was lurking in PDF couple of weeks back. I saw him post in some thread.



You can get a fair idea here too in the attachment. but just a fair idea..
Thats the same think we updated with more recent data and it came out to USD 97xx or less than USD 10000 against jane quoting USD 16500. The under 10000 USD is as per French Senat report and thus is of true field data over models used by Jane..

Dassault Rafale, tender | News & Discussions [Thread 2] | Page 124
start from another page before.. so that you get all the gist of Vauban and Picdelamirand help in understanding CPFH from Senat report
 
. . .
I doubt Rafale,whether 36 or 189 will make any difference in an air war with either PAF or PLAAF or both.
IAF has unquestionable superiority over PAF anyways and Rafale will not save IAF from being routed if PLAAF decides bring its might on IAF.
Seriosuly? What kind of defeatist attitude is this? Thank god you don't have any say in military matters.

By 2030, the Indian economy will be the 3rd largest in the world and India will be more than capable of giving China a bloody nose if it invests properly in the right equipment now.

And it isn't a case of the LCA vs Rafale or Rafale vs FGFA or Rafale vs MKI as too many commentators try to frame the disscussion as to suit their own agenda. They are all very different products with very different strengths in mind and all will be coming to the IAF, there is no degree of mutual exclusivity with any of the above- more Rafales will not mean less LCA or vice versa.
 
.
Let this document from Dassult be here too..

Its almost the same thing as said by @Picdelamirand-oil
@PARIKRAMA @Abingdonboy

Link

Mission ready with low operating costs


French Air Force Rafale B in operations (Opération Serval) - In flight over Mali. Fitted with the Damoclès Pod and GBU-12 laser guided bombs. - A. Jeuland © French Air Force

1 – Built-in supportability

The RAFALE supportability and mission readiness claims are supported by the undisputed track record of the earlier generation of French fighters, such as the combat-proven MIRAGE 2000.

From the early beginning of the development phase, the French MoD assigned very stringent “integrated logistic support” (ILS) requirements to the RAFALE programme. “Computer aided design” (CAD) with the Dassault Systèmes CATIA software suite, concurrent engineering and bold technological choices ultimately produced an ILS system that exceeds the original supportability requirements.

The following examples, selected from a range of unique and innovative features, demonstrate the advance in reliability, accessibility and maintainability brought by the RAFALE:

  • Based on 20 years plus of experience gained on the MIRAGE 2000, integrated testability of the Weapon Delivery and Navigation System (WDNS) has proven itself. Accordingly, it has been decided on the RAFALE to extend it to all aircraft systems. Thanks to accurate and comprehensive testability features, it allows targeted replacements to be made on the flight line, down to electronic circuit boards and specific components.
  • Human factors engineering work has been conducted with CATIA in order to ensure the accessibility of the components within aircraft bays, so that all flight line operations can be carried out by a single technician. Special attention has been paid to minimizing the duration of these operations and the occurrence of errors.
  • The centralised armament safety system makes all safety pins and last chance / end-of-runway actions unnecessary, minimising the risk of errors and accidents, and contributing to achieve an unbeatable “turn around time” (TAT).
  • Precision manufacturing techniques together with the use of CATIA eliminate time-consuming boresighting procedures following cannon, head-up display (HUD) or radar exchanges.
  • The groundbreaking design of the M88 suppresses the requirement for a check on a dedicated engine test bench before reinstalling it back on the aircraft.
  • Deployments on forward operating bases, including austere airfields, have been made easier by keeping ground support equipment to a minimum :
  • The RAFALE is fitted with an on-board oxygen generation system (OBOGS) which suppresses the need for liquid oxygen re-filling. Ground support equipment for the production and transportation of oxygen is no longer required
  • Optronics are cooled by a closed-loop nitrogen circuit, which negates the need for a dedicated nitrogen supply chain.
  • The built-in auxiliary power unit (APU) makes engine start-up possible even when no ground power cart is available.
  • All ground support equipment is compact and foldable in order to be easily transportable by air. It can be used without external power. And only two types of carriages and cradles are necessary to perform all armament loading / unloading.
  • All these maintainability features have been thoroughly assessed and validated by French Navy and French Air Force maintainers.
2 – An affordable high-tech fighter

Thanks to its outstanding reliability, the RAFALE has lower maintenance costs.

  • Its unique maintenance concept results in a lighter scheduled maintenance plan with less man-hours and a smaller number of maintenance technicians.
  • For all its service life, the RAFALE does not have to leave its operational base for maintenance purposes. It does away with costly and time-consuming airframe and engine depot level inspections required on other types of fighter aircraft, with “shop replaceable units” (SRUs) the only items to be shipped for maintenance / repair.
  • A case in point is the modular M88 engine, made up of 21 modules: all maintenance and repair can be done by returning nothing more than modules or discrete parts to the depot or to the manufacturer. No balancing procedure and no run-up check are necessary before returning the engine to service.
  • Failure-prone systems have been eliminated early on in the design process:
  • there is no airbrake
  • the air intakes have no moving parts
  • the ac generators do not have any constant speed drive (CSD)
  • and the refuelling probe is fixed in order to avoid any deployment or retraction problem.
This results in reduced spares inventory, less man-hours and less ground support equipment.

  • Another source of reduction of the required spares inventory comes from the constant standardisation approach during the design phase,
  • The same part number is used at various locations on the airframe: this is made possible with precision airframe
  • Manufacturing which allows to suppress fitting and boresighting operations when installing airframe components.
  • Left-hand and right-hand parts are identical wherever applicable (i.e. foreplanes, FCS actuators).
  • Miscellaneous parts such as screws and electronic modules have also been included into the standardisation effort.
  • The required spares inventory is further reduced by adapting the troubleshooting procedures to allow the exchange of electronic circuit boards within “line replaceable units” (LRUs), rather than exchanging the LRUs: this applies to the RBE2 radar, the SPECTRA EW suite, the MDPU mission computer and to other equipment as well.
  • Special attention has been paid to accessibility issues: for instance, the side-opening canopy facilitates the replacement of the ejection seat, so that two technicians can perform its removal in 10 minutes only.
  • No heavy test equipment is needed around the RAFALE on the flight line: All checks at this level can be run by maintenance technicians on the aircraft itself.
  • No test bench is needed for the M88 engine, a remarkable first in fighter aircraft maintenance.
  • Based on significant experience in corrosion protection for carrier-based aircraft (SUPER ETENDARD) and maritime patrol aircraft (ATLANTIC 1/ ATLANTIQUE 2), DASSAULT AVIATION has developed new advanced corrosion protection processes which help drive down the cost of maintenance of the RAFALE: corrosion issues discovered during maintenance being the perfect “show stopper” which exceeds spending targets and delays the return of aircraft to service in the most unpredictable way.
 
.
Seriosuly? What kind of defeatist attitude is this? Thank god you don't have any say in military matters.

By 2030, the Indian economy will be the 3rd largest in the world and India will be more than capable of giving China a bloody nose if it invests properly in the right equipment now.

And it isn't a case of the LCA vs Rafale or Rafale vs FGFA or Rafale vs MKI as too many commentators try to frame the disscussion as to suit their own agenda. They are all very different products with very different strengths in mind and all will be coming to the IAF, there is no degree of mutual exclusivity with any of the above- more Rafales will not mean less LCA or vice versa.

What you mistake as defeatist attitude is called realism.You would know more avout it if you stopped living in virtual world of internet forums and be a normal human being like the rest of us.See I can be snarky too but that never helps an argument.Peace and pleaseDont take my bs personally.I m only making a point.

Regarding PLAAF IAF matter it has been established since last century that wars are a function of industrial strength of a nation rather than valour of its soldiers.All factors which sigficantly impact the outcome of conflict between nations like numbers,geography(suits india),industry,infrastructure,technology etc are loaded in favour of china.
You cant fight china which can churn out 2 j 10 per month among other fighters with x number of imported rafales without ruining the indian economy.
Only fool would talk of a direct engagement with a stronger adversary based on some false sense of bravado.
Regarding India being this rich or that rich in year x my opinion is India will always underperform if it continues to take sub optimal decisions.I have already made it clear why i think rafale is a sub optimal decision.
Cheers bro.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom